管理数据库和结果评估:问题和潜在效用的概述

S. Gandhi, J. W. Salmon, S. Kong, Sean Z. Zhao
{"title":"管理数据库和结果评估:问题和潜在效用的概述","authors":"S. Gandhi, J. W. Salmon, S. Kong, Sean Z. Zhao","doi":"10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.3.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To make health care researchers, clinicians, and managers who are relatively new to outcomes research using administrative databases more aware of issues to consider when planning or conducting studies, and to encourage improvement in the data quality and structure of administrative databases. CONCLUSION: Administrative databases are being used more frequently in the assessment of health care interventions. Their increased popularity as a research tool can be attributed to timely availability, the large patient populations they cover, low cost, and applicability in the real world. However, there are limitations to their use as an outcomes assessment tool due to their structure, the data collection processes and the inherent nature of the U.S. health care delivery system.","PeriodicalId":50156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.3.215","citationCount":"68","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administrative Databases and Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of Issues and Potential Utility\",\"authors\":\"S. Gandhi, J. W. Salmon, S. Kong, Sean Z. Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.3.215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To make health care researchers, clinicians, and managers who are relatively new to outcomes research using administrative databases more aware of issues to consider when planning or conducting studies, and to encourage improvement in the data quality and structure of administrative databases. CONCLUSION: Administrative databases are being used more frequently in the assessment of health care interventions. Their increased popularity as a research tool can be attributed to timely availability, the large patient populations they cover, low cost, and applicability in the real world. However, there are limitations to their use as an outcomes assessment tool due to their structure, the data collection processes and the inherent nature of the U.S. health care delivery system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.3.215\",\"citationCount\":\"68\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.3.215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.3.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

摘要

目的:使对使用行政数据库进行结局研究相对陌生的卫生保健研究人员、临床医生和管理人员更加了解在规划或开展研究时需要考虑的问题,并鼓励改进行政数据库的数据质量和结构。结论:在卫生保健干预措施的评估中,越来越多地使用行政数据库。它们作为一种研究工具越来越受欢迎,可归因于及时可用性、它们覆盖的大量患者群体、低成本以及在现实世界中的适用性。然而,由于其结构、数据收集过程和美国卫生保健服务系统的固有性质,它们作为结果评估工具的使用存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Administrative Databases and Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of Issues and Potential Utility
OBJECTIVE: To make health care researchers, clinicians, and managers who are relatively new to outcomes research using administrative databases more aware of issues to consider when planning or conducting studies, and to encourage improvement in the data quality and structure of administrative databases. CONCLUSION: Administrative databases are being used more frequently in the assessment of health care interventions. Their increased popularity as a research tool can be attributed to timely availability, the large patient populations they cover, low cost, and applicability in the real world. However, there are limitations to their use as an outcomes assessment tool due to their structure, the data collection processes and the inherent nature of the U.S. health care delivery system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信