一项为期13年的多中心研究:开放式和胸腔镜肺切除术的疗效和成本比较

Azam Jan, N. I. Awan, A. Mohammad, Syed Ma Shah, Somaiyya Rehman, M. Tariq, Tahir Iqbal, J. Rehman
{"title":"一项为期13年的多中心研究:开放式和胸腔镜肺切除术的疗效和成本比较","authors":"Azam Jan, N. I. Awan, A. Mohammad, Syed Ma Shah, Somaiyya Rehman, M. Tariq, Tahir Iqbal, J. Rehman","doi":"10.15761/gos.1000203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We wanted to compare the outcome and cost of open and thoracoscopic (VATS) pneumonectomy. Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to compare the in-hospital mortality and morbidity of patients who underwent pneumonectomy either by thoracoscopy or thoracotomy approaches. We also wanted to determine risk factors for in-hospital mortality (death during hospital admission) and/or morbidity after pneumonectomy. Methodology: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), sponsored by The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ), includes the largest collection of longitudinal hospital care data in the United States. The data in the HCUP databases primarily include data from non-federal community hospitals. HCUP creates the National In-patient Sample (NIS) to help conduct national and regional analysis of in-patient care. NIS was the primary database used for this research purpose. The NIS is derived from the State In-patient Databases (SID) and approximates a 20% sample of discharges from all HCUP community hospitals in the U.S. The NIS is the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient health care database in the United States, yielding national estimates of hospital inpatient stays. Unweighted, it contains data from more than 7 million hospital stays each year. Weighted, it estimates more than 35 million hospitalizations nationally. Results: We enrolled a total of 37,037 patients. Since 2001, the number of pneumonectomies have decreased from 3,518 to 1920 in 2013.The in-hospital mortality was 8.67 % in 2001 which is down to 4.43% in 2013. Mean charge increased from 48,412 $ in 2001 to 121069 $ in 2013. Also, there is no change in routine discharges, use of nursing home, rehabilitation institutions, home health care over the years 2008 to 2012. Mean length of hospital stay was 9.2 days. Total deaths in our study were 2959 patients. Conclusions: Thoracoscopic pneumonectomies decrease cost and are discharged to home more frequently as compared to open pneumonectomies. Abbreviations: AHRQ: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s; HCUP: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; SID: State Inpatient Databases; NIS: National Inpatient Sample (NIS); ICD9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM); VATS: Video associated thoracoscopic surgery.","PeriodicalId":73175,"journal":{"name":"Global surgery (London)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcome and cost in open and thoracoscopic pneumonectomy: A 13 years multicentre study\",\"authors\":\"Azam Jan, N. I. Awan, A. Mohammad, Syed Ma Shah, Somaiyya Rehman, M. Tariq, Tahir Iqbal, J. Rehman\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/gos.1000203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: We wanted to compare the outcome and cost of open and thoracoscopic (VATS) pneumonectomy. Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to compare the in-hospital mortality and morbidity of patients who underwent pneumonectomy either by thoracoscopy or thoracotomy approaches. We also wanted to determine risk factors for in-hospital mortality (death during hospital admission) and/or morbidity after pneumonectomy. Methodology: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), sponsored by The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ), includes the largest collection of longitudinal hospital care data in the United States. The data in the HCUP databases primarily include data from non-federal community hospitals. HCUP creates the National In-patient Sample (NIS) to help conduct national and regional analysis of in-patient care. NIS was the primary database used for this research purpose. The NIS is derived from the State In-patient Databases (SID) and approximates a 20% sample of discharges from all HCUP community hospitals in the U.S. The NIS is the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient health care database in the United States, yielding national estimates of hospital inpatient stays. Unweighted, it contains data from more than 7 million hospital stays each year. Weighted, it estimates more than 35 million hospitalizations nationally. Results: We enrolled a total of 37,037 patients. Since 2001, the number of pneumonectomies have decreased from 3,518 to 1920 in 2013.The in-hospital mortality was 8.67 % in 2001 which is down to 4.43% in 2013. Mean charge increased from 48,412 $ in 2001 to 121069 $ in 2013. Also, there is no change in routine discharges, use of nursing home, rehabilitation institutions, home health care over the years 2008 to 2012. Mean length of hospital stay was 9.2 days. Total deaths in our study were 2959 patients. Conclusions: Thoracoscopic pneumonectomies decrease cost and are discharged to home more frequently as compared to open pneumonectomies. Abbreviations: AHRQ: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s; HCUP: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; SID: State Inpatient Databases; NIS: National Inpatient Sample (NIS); ICD9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM); VATS: Video associated thoracoscopic surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global surgery (London)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global surgery (London)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/gos.1000203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global surgery (London)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/gos.1000203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们想比较开腹和胸腔镜(VATS)全肺切除术的结果和成本。简介:本研究的主要目的是比较通过胸腔镜或开胸入路行全肺切除术患者的住院死亡率和发病率。我们还想确定住院死亡率(住院期间死亡)和/或全肺切除术后发病率的危险因素。方法:医疗保健成本和利用项目(HCUP),由医疗保健研究和质量机构(AHRQ)赞助,包括美国最大的纵向医院护理数据集。HCUP数据库中的数据主要包括来自非联邦社区医院的数据。HCUP创建了国家住院病人样本(NIS),以帮助对住院病人护理进行国家和地区分析。NIS是用于本研究目的的主要数据库。NIS来源于州住院患者数据库(SID),并对美国所有HCUP社区医院20%的出院样本进行了近似分析。NIS是美国最大的公开的全付款人住院医疗保健数据库,可得出全国住院患者的估计。未经加权,它包含每年700多万次住院的数据。加权后,估计全国有超过3500万人住院。结果:我们共纳入了37,037名患者。自2001年以来,肺切除术的数量从3518例减少到2013年的1920例。住院死亡率从2001年的8.67%下降到2013年的4.43%。平均费用从2001年的48,412美元增加到2013年的121069美元。此外,在2008年至2012年期间,常规出院、使用疗养院、康复机构和家庭保健方面没有变化。平均住院时间为9.2天。在我们的研究中,总死亡人数为2959例。结论:与开放式肺切除术相比,胸腔镜肺切除术费用低,出院次数多。缩写:AHRQ:卫生保健研究和质量机构;HCUP:医疗成本与利用项目;SID:国家住院病人数据库;NIS:国家住院病人样本;国际疾病分类,临床修改(ICD-9-CM);VATS:视频胸腔镜手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of outcome and cost in open and thoracoscopic pneumonectomy: A 13 years multicentre study
Objective: We wanted to compare the outcome and cost of open and thoracoscopic (VATS) pneumonectomy. Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to compare the in-hospital mortality and morbidity of patients who underwent pneumonectomy either by thoracoscopy or thoracotomy approaches. We also wanted to determine risk factors for in-hospital mortality (death during hospital admission) and/or morbidity after pneumonectomy. Methodology: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), sponsored by The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ), includes the largest collection of longitudinal hospital care data in the United States. The data in the HCUP databases primarily include data from non-federal community hospitals. HCUP creates the National In-patient Sample (NIS) to help conduct national and regional analysis of in-patient care. NIS was the primary database used for this research purpose. The NIS is derived from the State In-patient Databases (SID) and approximates a 20% sample of discharges from all HCUP community hospitals in the U.S. The NIS is the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient health care database in the United States, yielding national estimates of hospital inpatient stays. Unweighted, it contains data from more than 7 million hospital stays each year. Weighted, it estimates more than 35 million hospitalizations nationally. Results: We enrolled a total of 37,037 patients. Since 2001, the number of pneumonectomies have decreased from 3,518 to 1920 in 2013.The in-hospital mortality was 8.67 % in 2001 which is down to 4.43% in 2013. Mean charge increased from 48,412 $ in 2001 to 121069 $ in 2013. Also, there is no change in routine discharges, use of nursing home, rehabilitation institutions, home health care over the years 2008 to 2012. Mean length of hospital stay was 9.2 days. Total deaths in our study were 2959 patients. Conclusions: Thoracoscopic pneumonectomies decrease cost and are discharged to home more frequently as compared to open pneumonectomies. Abbreviations: AHRQ: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s; HCUP: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; SID: State Inpatient Databases; NIS: National Inpatient Sample (NIS); ICD9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM); VATS: Video associated thoracoscopic surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信