基于加工的同构观察分析

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Chorong Kang, Oh, Eunjeong
{"title":"基于加工的同构观察分析","authors":"Chorong Kang, Oh, Eunjeong","doi":"10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kang, Chorong and Eunjeong Oh. 2020. A processing-based analysis on the observation of isomorphism. Linguistic Research 37(3): 581-616. Since Musolino’s (1998) influential work, studies on children’s acquisition of scope interpretation have investigated children’s grammatical knowledge and processing mechanisms that derive the difference between children and adults in their interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences. In the current work, we propose a processing-based account for the fundamental question of why children do not get some interpretations among alternative interpretations. Being inspired by the argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement, proposed by Orfitelli (2012), we suggest that children’s parsing mechanism has difficulties in correctly filling the gap (i.e. the base position of the displaced element) with a scope bearing element that undergoes movement if there is another scope bearing element between the filler-gap dependency. We discuss how the current proposal can account for many observations reported in previous works. Furthermore, to show that such an argument intervention effect in the domain of scope acquisition is a matter of configuration, we conducted an experiment on Korean. Korean is a language where an object undergoes movement over negation, which is the argument intervention configuration. We found that Korean-speaking children show the argument intervention effect in learning scope interpretation. This result supports the idea that children’s interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences is configurationally determined and the immature parser is susceptible to the argument intervention effect. (Seoul National University ∙ Sangmyung University)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"581-616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A processing-based analysis on the observation of isomorphism\",\"authors\":\"Chorong Kang, Oh, Eunjeong\",\"doi\":\"10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kang, Chorong and Eunjeong Oh. 2020. A processing-based analysis on the observation of isomorphism. Linguistic Research 37(3): 581-616. Since Musolino’s (1998) influential work, studies on children’s acquisition of scope interpretation have investigated children’s grammatical knowledge and processing mechanisms that derive the difference between children and adults in their interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences. In the current work, we propose a processing-based account for the fundamental question of why children do not get some interpretations among alternative interpretations. Being inspired by the argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement, proposed by Orfitelli (2012), we suggest that children’s parsing mechanism has difficulties in correctly filling the gap (i.e. the base position of the displaced element) with a scope bearing element that undergoes movement if there is another scope bearing element between the filler-gap dependency. We discuss how the current proposal can account for many observations reported in previous works. Furthermore, to show that such an argument intervention effect in the domain of scope acquisition is a matter of configuration, we conducted an experiment on Korean. Korean is a language where an object undergoes movement over negation, which is the argument intervention configuration. We found that Korean-speaking children show the argument intervention effect in learning scope interpretation. This result supports the idea that children’s interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences is configurationally determined and the immature parser is susceptible to the argument intervention effect. (Seoul National University ∙ Sangmyung University)\",\"PeriodicalId\":43095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"581-616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Kang, Chorong和Eunjeong Oh. 2020。基于加工的同构观察分析。语言研究37(3):581-616。自Musolino(1998)的影响深远的工作以来,关于儿童范围解释习得的研究探讨了儿童的语法知识和加工机制,这些知识和加工机制导致了儿童和成人在解释范围歧义句子方面的差异。在目前的工作中,我们提出了一个基于处理的解释,以解释为什么儿童在不同的解释中得不到一些解释的基本问题。受Orfitelli(2012)提出的a -movement习得中的论证干预的启发,我们认为,如果在填充物-间隙依赖关系之间存在另一个作用域承载元素,则儿童的解析机制难以正确地用一个作用域承载元素填充空隙(即移位元素的基位),该作用域承载元素会发生移动。我们将讨论当前的建议如何解释以前工作中报告的许多观察结果。此外,为了证明这种争论干预效应在范围获取领域是一个配置问题,我们对韩语进行了实验。韩国语是一种物体经过运动而不是否定的语言,这是一种论点介入结构。我们发现韩语儿童在学习范围解释中表现出论证干预效应。这一结果支持了儿童对范围模糊句子的解释是由构型决定的,不成熟的解析器容易受到论点干预效应的影响。(首尔大学∙祥明大学)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A processing-based analysis on the observation of isomorphism
Kang, Chorong and Eunjeong Oh. 2020. A processing-based analysis on the observation of isomorphism. Linguistic Research 37(3): 581-616. Since Musolino’s (1998) influential work, studies on children’s acquisition of scope interpretation have investigated children’s grammatical knowledge and processing mechanisms that derive the difference between children and adults in their interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences. In the current work, we propose a processing-based account for the fundamental question of why children do not get some interpretations among alternative interpretations. Being inspired by the argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement, proposed by Orfitelli (2012), we suggest that children’s parsing mechanism has difficulties in correctly filling the gap (i.e. the base position of the displaced element) with a scope bearing element that undergoes movement if there is another scope bearing element between the filler-gap dependency. We discuss how the current proposal can account for many observations reported in previous works. Furthermore, to show that such an argument intervention effect in the domain of scope acquisition is a matter of configuration, we conducted an experiment on Korean. Korean is a language where an object undergoes movement over negation, which is the argument intervention configuration. We found that Korean-speaking children show the argument intervention effect in learning scope interpretation. This result supports the idea that children’s interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences is configurationally determined and the immature parser is susceptible to the argument intervention effect. (Seoul National University ∙ Sangmyung University)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Research
Linguistic Research LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信