跨语言表达句子否定:基于结构的HPSG视角

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Linguistic Research Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.007

Jong-Bok Kim

{"title":"跨语言表达句子否定:基于结构的HPSG视角","authors":"Jong-Bok Kim","doi":"10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kim, Jong-Bok. 2018. Expressing sentential negation across languages: A construction-based HPSG perspective. Linguistic Research 35(3), 583-623. Each language employs its own grammatical device to express negation. This positional paper discusses four main ways of negation we find in natural languages: morphological negative, auxiliary negative, adverbial negative, and clitic-like negative. The paper first critically reviews derivational views in accounting for the grammatical properties of these four different types of negation and then offers a Construction-based HPSG analysis for each type. It argues that it is more viable to admit different morphological and syntactic categories of negation rather than to posit the uniform syntactic category Neg for all these types of negation. The paper also shows that it is more optimal to allow a modular approach between morphology and syntax, while allowing tight interactions among different grammatical levels. (Kyung Hee University)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expressing sentential negation across languages: A construction-based HPSG perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jong-Bok Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kim, Jong-Bok. 2018. Expressing sentential negation across languages: A construction-based HPSG perspective. Linguistic Research 35(3), 583-623. Each language employs its own grammatical device to express negation. This positional paper discusses four main ways of negation we find in natural languages: morphological negative, auxiliary negative, adverbial negative, and clitic-like negative. The paper first critically reviews derivational views in accounting for the grammatical properties of these four different types of negation and then offers a Construction-based HPSG analysis for each type. It argues that it is more viable to admit different morphological and syntactic categories of negation rather than to posit the uniform syntactic category Neg for all these types of negation. The paper also shows that it is more optimal to allow a modular approach between morphology and syntax, while allowing tight interactions among different grammatical levels. (Kyung Hee University)\",\"PeriodicalId\":43095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Expressing sentential negation across languages: A construction-based HPSG perspective

Kim, Jong-Bok. 2018. Expressing sentential negation across languages: A construction-based HPSG perspective. Linguistic Research 35(3), 583-623. Each language employs its own grammatical device to express negation. This positional paper discusses four main ways of negation we find in natural languages: morphological negative, auxiliary negative, adverbial negative, and clitic-like negative. The paper first critically reviews derivational views in accounting for the grammatical properties of these four different types of negation and then offers a Construction-based HPSG analysis for each type. It argues that it is more viable to admit different morphological and syntactic categories of negation rather than to posit the uniform syntactic category Neg for all these types of negation. The paper also shows that it is more optimal to allow a modular approach between morphology and syntax, while allowing tight interactions among different grammatical levels. (Kyung Hee University)

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Linguistic Research LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.