语境化辩论:框架、设计和数据*

IF 1.3 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
J. Stekelenburg, S. Walgrave, B. Klandermans, Joris Verhulst
{"title":"语境化辩论:框架、设计和数据*","authors":"J. Stekelenburg, S. Walgrave, B. Klandermans, Joris Verhulst","doi":"10.17813/MAIQ.17.3.A4418X2Q772153X2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the theoretical underpinnings, design, methods, and measures of the project, Caught in the Act of Protest: Contextualizing Contestation. This effort examines street demonstrations that vary in atmosphere, organization, and target. The project particularly focuses on participants, exploring who participates, and why and how people got involved. Data are collected before, during, and after a number of demonstrations, and captures the entire “demonstration moment.” We develop standardized measures and techniques for sampling and data collection at the individual demonstrator level and at the contexual level. Evidence was gathered not only from the demonstrators but also from police, organizers, and the mass media. Data-gathering efforts were standardized through identical methods, questionnaires, fact sheets, and content analysis protocols. The CCC project examines demonstrations in Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain, Switzerland, and Sweden between 2009 and 2012. Teams from Italy, Mexico, and the Czech Republic joined the project at a later stage. The project has covered 61 demonstrations and 12,993 questionnaires have been completed to date. Caught in the Act of Protest: Contextualizing Contestation project (CCC) is set up to combine interview data from individual demonstration participants with multilayered con-textual data. This combination provides insight into the relationship between individual participation and meaningful contextual differences. To that end, we developed standardized measures and techniques for sampling and data collection both at the individual demonstrator level and the context level (Klandermans, van Stekelenburg, van Troost, van Leeuwen, Walgrave, Verhulst, van Laer and Wouters 2010). This essay presents the CCC project, its theoretical underpinnings, design, methods, and measures. To start, we briefly elaborate upon the phenomenon of street demonstrations. 1 The","PeriodicalId":47309,"journal":{"name":"Mobilization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.17.3.A4418X2Q772153X2","citationCount":"91","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONTEXTUALIZING CONTESTATION: FRAMEWORK, DESIGN, AND DATA *\",\"authors\":\"J. Stekelenburg, S. Walgrave, B. Klandermans, Joris Verhulst\",\"doi\":\"10.17813/MAIQ.17.3.A4418X2Q772153X2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the theoretical underpinnings, design, methods, and measures of the project, Caught in the Act of Protest: Contextualizing Contestation. This effort examines street demonstrations that vary in atmosphere, organization, and target. The project particularly focuses on participants, exploring who participates, and why and how people got involved. Data are collected before, during, and after a number of demonstrations, and captures the entire “demonstration moment.” We develop standardized measures and techniques for sampling and data collection at the individual demonstrator level and at the contexual level. Evidence was gathered not only from the demonstrators but also from police, organizers, and the mass media. Data-gathering efforts were standardized through identical methods, questionnaires, fact sheets, and content analysis protocols. The CCC project examines demonstrations in Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain, Switzerland, and Sweden between 2009 and 2012. Teams from Italy, Mexico, and the Czech Republic joined the project at a later stage. The project has covered 61 demonstrations and 12,993 questionnaires have been completed to date. Caught in the Act of Protest: Contextualizing Contestation project (CCC) is set up to combine interview data from individual demonstration participants with multilayered con-textual data. This combination provides insight into the relationship between individual participation and meaningful contextual differences. To that end, we developed standardized measures and techniques for sampling and data collection both at the individual demonstrator level and the context level (Klandermans, van Stekelenburg, van Troost, van Leeuwen, Walgrave, Verhulst, van Laer and Wouters 2010). This essay presents the CCC project, its theoretical underpinnings, design, methods, and measures. To start, we briefly elaborate upon the phenomenon of street demonstrations. 1 The\",\"PeriodicalId\":47309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mobilization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.17.3.A4418X2Q772153X2\",\"citationCount\":\"91\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mobilization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.17.3.A4418X2Q772153X2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.17.3.A4418X2Q772153X2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

摘要

本文介绍了“陷入抗议行为:语境化争论”项目的理论基础、设计、方法和措施。这一努力考察了在气氛、组织和目标上各不相同的街头示威。该项目特别关注参与者,探索谁参与,以及人们为什么和如何参与。在许多演示之前、期间和之后收集数据,并捕获整个“演示时刻”。我们制定了标准化的措施和技术,用于在个人示范水平和环境水平上进行抽样和数据收集。证据不仅来自示威者,还来自警察、组织者和大众媒体。数据收集工作通过相同的方法、问卷调查、事实表和内容分析协议进行标准化。CCC项目考察了2009年至2012年间在比利时、荷兰、英国、西班牙、瑞士和瑞典的示范。来自意大利、墨西哥和捷克共和国的团队在后期加入了该项目。该项目包括61次示范,迄今已完成12 993份调查表。“陷入抗议行为:语境化争论项目”(CCC)的建立是为了将来自个别示威参与者的采访数据与多层语境数据相结合。这种结合提供了对个人参与和有意义的语境差异之间关系的洞察。为此,我们在个体示范水平和情境水平开发了标准化的采样和数据收集措施和技术(Klandermans, van Stekelenburg, van Troost, van Leeuwen, Walgrave, Verhulst, van Laer和Wouters 2010)。本文介绍了CCC项目及其理论基础、设计、方法和措施。首先,我们简单阐述一下街头示威的现象。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONTEXTUALIZING CONTESTATION: FRAMEWORK, DESIGN, AND DATA *
This article presents the theoretical underpinnings, design, methods, and measures of the project, Caught in the Act of Protest: Contextualizing Contestation. This effort examines street demonstrations that vary in atmosphere, organization, and target. The project particularly focuses on participants, exploring who participates, and why and how people got involved. Data are collected before, during, and after a number of demonstrations, and captures the entire “demonstration moment.” We develop standardized measures and techniques for sampling and data collection at the individual demonstrator level and at the contexual level. Evidence was gathered not only from the demonstrators but also from police, organizers, and the mass media. Data-gathering efforts were standardized through identical methods, questionnaires, fact sheets, and content analysis protocols. The CCC project examines demonstrations in Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain, Switzerland, and Sweden between 2009 and 2012. Teams from Italy, Mexico, and the Czech Republic joined the project at a later stage. The project has covered 61 demonstrations and 12,993 questionnaires have been completed to date. Caught in the Act of Protest: Contextualizing Contestation project (CCC) is set up to combine interview data from individual demonstration participants with multilayered con-textual data. This combination provides insight into the relationship between individual participation and meaningful contextual differences. To that end, we developed standardized measures and techniques for sampling and data collection both at the individual demonstrator level and the context level (Klandermans, van Stekelenburg, van Troost, van Leeuwen, Walgrave, Verhulst, van Laer and Wouters 2010). This essay presents the CCC project, its theoretical underpinnings, design, methods, and measures. To start, we briefly elaborate upon the phenomenon of street demonstrations. 1 The
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mobilization
Mobilization SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Mobilization: An International Quarterly is the premier journal of research specializing in social movements, protests, insurgencies, revolutions, and other forms of contentious politics. Mobilization was first published in 1996 to fill the need for a scholarly review of research that focused exclusively with social movements, protest and collective action. Mobilization is fully peer-reviewed and widely indexed. A 2003 study, when Mobilization was published semiannually, showed that its citation index rate was 1.286, which placed it among the top ten sociology journals. Today, Mobilization is published four times a year, in March, June, September, and December. The editorial board is composed of thirty internationally recognized scholars from political science, sociology and social psychology. The goal of Mobilization is to provide a forum for global, scholarly dialogue. It is currently distributed to the top international research libraries and read by the most engaged scholars in the field. We hope that through its wide distribution, different research strategies and theoretical/conceptual approaches will be shared among the global community of social movement scholars, encouraging a collaborative process that will further the development of a cumulative social science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信