后苏联空间环境保护与自然管理的宪法规制:法律技术问题

Q4 Social Sciences
A. Anisimov, A. Ryzhenkov
{"title":"后苏联空间环境保护与自然管理的宪法规制:法律技术问题","authors":"A. Anisimov, A. Ryzhenkov","doi":"10.17234/socekol.28.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the issues of terminology and content of rules of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the constitutions of several republics of the former USSR regulating relations in the field of nature management and environmental protection from the perspective of Hans Kelsen’s normativism methodology, namely the Pure Theory of Law. The authors substantiate their conclusion that the constitutional rules in the countries of the post-Soviet space have a number of defects consisting of duplications or inadequate reflections of the legal reality. This leads to the suggestion for the need to conduct a search for options of enshrining rules on environmental protection and use of natural resources corresponding to realias of the 21st century in the future Constitution of Russia, which will allow creating an appropriate system of guarantees for everyone’s rights to a favorable environment, the rights of citizens and legal entities to natural resources, as well as specifying their environmental and natural resources duties.","PeriodicalId":35175,"journal":{"name":"Socijalna Ekologija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17234/socekol.28.2.1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutional Legal Regulation of Environmental Protection and Nature Management in the Post-Soviet Space: Issues of Legal Technique\",\"authors\":\"A. Anisimov, A. Ryzhenkov\",\"doi\":\"10.17234/socekol.28.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the issues of terminology and content of rules of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the constitutions of several republics of the former USSR regulating relations in the field of nature management and environmental protection from the perspective of Hans Kelsen’s normativism methodology, namely the Pure Theory of Law. The authors substantiate their conclusion that the constitutional rules in the countries of the post-Soviet space have a number of defects consisting of duplications or inadequate reflections of the legal reality. This leads to the suggestion for the need to conduct a search for options of enshrining rules on environmental protection and use of natural resources corresponding to realias of the 21st century in the future Constitution of Russia, which will allow creating an appropriate system of guarantees for everyone’s rights to a favorable environment, the rights of citizens and legal entities to natural resources, as well as specifying their environmental and natural resources duties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socijalna Ekologija\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17234/socekol.28.2.1\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socijalna Ekologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17234/socekol.28.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socijalna Ekologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17234/socekol.28.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从汉斯·凯尔森(Hans Kelsen)的规范主义方法论,即纯粹法学的角度,探讨了俄罗斯联邦宪法和前苏联几个共和国宪法中规定自然管理和环境保护领域关系的术语和规则内容问题。作者证实了他们的结论,即后苏联空间国家的宪法规则存在一些缺陷,包括重复或对法律现实的反映不足。因此,有人建议,有必要在未来的俄罗斯宪法中寻求与21世纪的现实相适应的环境保护和自然资源利用规则的选择,这将允许建立一个适当的制度,保障每个人享有良好环境的权利,公民和法人实体享有自然资源的权利,并明确他们的环境和自然资源义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constitutional Legal Regulation of Environmental Protection and Nature Management in the Post-Soviet Space: Issues of Legal Technique
This paper deals with the issues of terminology and content of rules of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the constitutions of several republics of the former USSR regulating relations in the field of nature management and environmental protection from the perspective of Hans Kelsen’s normativism methodology, namely the Pure Theory of Law. The authors substantiate their conclusion that the constitutional rules in the countries of the post-Soviet space have a number of defects consisting of duplications or inadequate reflections of the legal reality. This leads to the suggestion for the need to conduct a search for options of enshrining rules on environmental protection and use of natural resources corresponding to realias of the 21st century in the future Constitution of Russia, which will allow creating an appropriate system of guarantees for everyone’s rights to a favorable environment, the rights of citizens and legal entities to natural resources, as well as specifying their environmental and natural resources duties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socijalna Ekologija
Socijalna Ekologija Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信