欧洲浅基础承载力计算方法比较

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
J. Sieffert, C. Bay-Gress
{"title":"欧洲浅基础承载力计算方法比较","authors":"J. Sieffert, C. Bay-Gress","doi":"10.1680/GENG.2000.143.2.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to compare the methods used by the European countries to evaluate the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. Comparisons of several formulations of bearing capacity factors, depth and shape factors, load inclination and eccentricity factors, as well as values of these factors, are presented. This study has deliberately been restricted to methods using the bearing capacity factors Nc, Nq and Nγ: other methods exist and are used, but few of them are in common use in all European countries (for example, the pressiometric method is used almost exclusively in France), and consequently the comparison would be awkward. The most important conclusion is that the evaluated bearing capacity depends highly on the country. Therefore, bearing capacity needs to be better understood using new parametric and numerical analyses.","PeriodicalId":45150,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1680/GENG.2000.143.2.65","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF EUROPEAN BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION METHODS FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS\",\"authors\":\"J. Sieffert, C. Bay-Gress\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/GENG.2000.143.2.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to compare the methods used by the European countries to evaluate the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. Comparisons of several formulations of bearing capacity factors, depth and shape factors, load inclination and eccentricity factors, as well as values of these factors, are presented. This study has deliberately been restricted to methods using the bearing capacity factors Nc, Nq and Nγ: other methods exist and are used, but few of them are in common use in all European countries (for example, the pressiometric method is used almost exclusively in France), and consequently the comparison would be awkward. The most important conclusion is that the evaluated bearing capacity depends highly on the country. Therefore, bearing capacity needs to be better understood using new parametric and numerical analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1680/GENG.2000.143.2.65\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/GENG.2000.143.2.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/GENG.2000.143.2.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

本文的目的是比较欧洲国家对浅基础承载力的评价方法。比较了几种承载力因子、深度和形状因子、荷载倾斜和偏心因子的计算公式,以及这些因子的取值。本研究故意局限于使用承载力因子Nc, Nq和Nγ的方法:其他方法存在并使用,但其中很少在所有欧洲国家普遍使用(例如,压力测量法几乎只在法国使用),因此比较将是尴尬的。最重要的结论是,所评估的承载力高度依赖于国家。因此,需要使用新的参数和数值分析来更好地理解承载力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF EUROPEAN BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION METHODS FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS
The aim of this paper is to compare the methods used by the European countries to evaluate the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. Comparisons of several formulations of bearing capacity factors, depth and shape factors, load inclination and eccentricity factors, as well as values of these factors, are presented. This study has deliberately been restricted to methods using the bearing capacity factors Nc, Nq and Nγ: other methods exist and are used, but few of them are in common use in all European countries (for example, the pressiometric method is used almost exclusively in France), and consequently the comparison would be awkward. The most important conclusion is that the evaluated bearing capacity depends highly on the country. Therefore, bearing capacity needs to be better understood using new parametric and numerical analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geotechnical Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The objectives of the Association shall be the promotion of co-operation among geotechnical societies in SE Asia; and the assistance to member societies who have limited number of members. Now there is only one combined web titled: AGSSEA-SEAGS. SEAGS & AGSSEA encourage the submission of scholarly and practice-oriented articles to its journal. The journal is published quarterly. Both sponsors of the journal, the Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society and the Association of Geotechnical Societies in Southeast Asia, promote the ideals and goals of the International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechhnical Engineering in fostering communications, developing insights and enabling the advancement of the geotechnical engineering discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信