{"title":"促甲状腺激素抑制治疗甲状腺全切除术后分化型甲状腺癌的疗效观察","authors":"Niveen Abotouk, D. Zayed","doi":"10.1515/fco-2015-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effect of the TSH suppression on both disease-free and overall survivals in patients with nonmetastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) after total thyroidectomy. Patients & Methods: One hundred and forty eight patients with pathologically proved operable differentiated thyroid carcinoma were enrolled in this prospective study. Levothyroxin (L-T4) therapy was started in doses according to treatment groups. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative TSH suppression therapy in group I (76 patients) or nonsuppression therapy in group II (72 patients). Results: During the period of follow up with a median 54 months, the disease-free survival for patients without TSH suppression therapy did not reach statistically significant difference comparing with those for patients with the suppression therapy (p=0.09). However, the difference was statistically significant for high-risk patients (p=0.04). On comparing both groups there was no statistically significant difference with regard to overall survival (p=0.17). The age of the patients more than 45 years, tumour size more than 4 cm and high-risk group were significant independent predictors for thyroid carcinoma-related relapse in univariate analysis. However, tumour size was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Suppressive treatment with L-T4 therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma should be individualised and balanced against the adverse effects. TSH suppression is indicated in patients with high-risk disease or recurrent tumour. Normalisation of serum TSH is preferred for long-term treatment of disease-free elderly patients with DTC and comorbidities.","PeriodicalId":38592,"journal":{"name":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","volume":"6 1","pages":"24 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/fco-2015-0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Thyrotropin Suppression Therapy in Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer after Total Thyroidectomy\",\"authors\":\"Niveen Abotouk, D. Zayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/fco-2015-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effect of the TSH suppression on both disease-free and overall survivals in patients with nonmetastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) after total thyroidectomy. Patients & Methods: One hundred and forty eight patients with pathologically proved operable differentiated thyroid carcinoma were enrolled in this prospective study. Levothyroxin (L-T4) therapy was started in doses according to treatment groups. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative TSH suppression therapy in group I (76 patients) or nonsuppression therapy in group II (72 patients). Results: During the period of follow up with a median 54 months, the disease-free survival for patients without TSH suppression therapy did not reach statistically significant difference comparing with those for patients with the suppression therapy (p=0.09). However, the difference was statistically significant for high-risk patients (p=0.04). On comparing both groups there was no statistically significant difference with regard to overall survival (p=0.17). The age of the patients more than 45 years, tumour size more than 4 cm and high-risk group were significant independent predictors for thyroid carcinoma-related relapse in univariate analysis. However, tumour size was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Suppressive treatment with L-T4 therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma should be individualised and balanced against the adverse effects. TSH suppression is indicated in patients with high-risk disease or recurrent tumour. Normalisation of serum TSH is preferred for long-term treatment of disease-free elderly patients with DTC and comorbidities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"24 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/fco-2015-0010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/fco-2015-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fco-2015-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Efficacy of Thyrotropin Suppression Therapy in Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer after Total Thyroidectomy
Abstract Background: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effect of the TSH suppression on both disease-free and overall survivals in patients with nonmetastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) after total thyroidectomy. Patients & Methods: One hundred and forty eight patients with pathologically proved operable differentiated thyroid carcinoma were enrolled in this prospective study. Levothyroxin (L-T4) therapy was started in doses according to treatment groups. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative TSH suppression therapy in group I (76 patients) or nonsuppression therapy in group II (72 patients). Results: During the period of follow up with a median 54 months, the disease-free survival for patients without TSH suppression therapy did not reach statistically significant difference comparing with those for patients with the suppression therapy (p=0.09). However, the difference was statistically significant for high-risk patients (p=0.04). On comparing both groups there was no statistically significant difference with regard to overall survival (p=0.17). The age of the patients more than 45 years, tumour size more than 4 cm and high-risk group were significant independent predictors for thyroid carcinoma-related relapse in univariate analysis. However, tumour size was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Suppressive treatment with L-T4 therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma should be individualised and balanced against the adverse effects. TSH suppression is indicated in patients with high-risk disease or recurrent tumour. Normalisation of serum TSH is preferred for long-term treatment of disease-free elderly patients with DTC and comorbidities.