智利版动态Loewenstein职业治疗认知评估(DLOTCA)的验证研究

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vivian Neumann-Collyer, Karla Hernández-Pérez, Boris Paolo Moena González, Maria Francisca Rauch Gajardo
{"title":"智利版动态Loewenstein职业治疗认知评估(DLOTCA)的验证研究","authors":"Vivian Neumann-Collyer, Karla Hernández-Pérez, Boris Paolo Moena González, Maria Francisca Rauch Gajardo","doi":"10.1590/2526-8910.ctoao258333742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective To validate the Chilean Spanish translation of the tenth English version of the Dynamic Loewestein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for use in the Chilean population. Method The translation into Chilean Spanish was carried out, and then a pilot test was carried out for the application of the instrument, for which 40 adults were recruited with an average age of 42.7 years, with various brain damages and made up of 70% women and 30% men. To evaluate the reliability of the instrument, Cronbach's Alpha was calculated as a measure of Internal Consistency, applying 3 perspectives, \"Item-Total Reliability\", \"Item-Domain Reliability\", and \"Domain-Total Reliability\". To measure feasibility, the percentage of items not answered by the sample is identified, and the percentage of items that is identified in the cognitive tests as understood. Results The Item-Total reliability yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.953, which translates into excellent reliability. Item-Domain reliability was mostly between excellent and good, with weak reliability for the factors \"time orientation\" and \"visual perception\". The Domain-Total reliability yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.810, which translates into good reliability. Finally, in relation to feasibility, the participants answered 100% of the items, evidencing the translation to be accessible. Conclusion The DLOTCA translated into Chilean Spanish; it presents a high reliability, which allows obtaining results with very low biases, becoming an instrument that can be used in a pertinent way in the Chilean population.","PeriodicalId":43119,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional-Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation study of the Chilean version of the Dynamic Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (DLOTCA)\",\"authors\":\"Vivian Neumann-Collyer, Karla Hernández-Pérez, Boris Paolo Moena González, Maria Francisca Rauch Gajardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2526-8910.ctoao258333742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective To validate the Chilean Spanish translation of the tenth English version of the Dynamic Loewestein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for use in the Chilean population. Method The translation into Chilean Spanish was carried out, and then a pilot test was carried out for the application of the instrument, for which 40 adults were recruited with an average age of 42.7 years, with various brain damages and made up of 70% women and 30% men. To evaluate the reliability of the instrument, Cronbach's Alpha was calculated as a measure of Internal Consistency, applying 3 perspectives, \\\"Item-Total Reliability\\\", \\\"Item-Domain Reliability\\\", and \\\"Domain-Total Reliability\\\". To measure feasibility, the percentage of items not answered by the sample is identified, and the percentage of items that is identified in the cognitive tests as understood. Results The Item-Total reliability yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.953, which translates into excellent reliability. Item-Domain reliability was mostly between excellent and good, with weak reliability for the factors \\\"time orientation\\\" and \\\"visual perception\\\". The Domain-Total reliability yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.810, which translates into good reliability. Finally, in relation to feasibility, the participants answered 100% of the items, evidencing the translation to be accessible. Conclusion The DLOTCA translated into Chilean Spanish; it presents a high reliability, which allows obtaining results with very low biases, becoming an instrument that can be used in a pertinent way in the Chilean population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional-Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional-Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoao258333742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional-Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoao258333742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的验证Loewestein动态职业治疗认知评估(Loewestein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment,简称Loewestein)第十版英文版的智利西班牙语翻译在智利人群中的应用。方法先将其翻译成智利语,然后进行仪器应用的先导试验,招募40名平均年龄42.7岁、脑损伤程度不同的成年人,其中女性占70%,男性占30%。为了评估该工具的可靠性,采用“项目-总信度”、“项目-领域信度”和“领域-总信度”3个角度计算Cronbach's Alpha作为内部一致性的度量。为了测量可行性,确定了样本未回答的项目的百分比,以及在认知测试中确定为理解的项目的百分比。结果项目-总信度Cronbach's Alpha为0.953,信度极佳。项目域信度大都介于优和良之间,“时间取向”和“视觉感知”的信度较弱。Domain-Total信度的Cronbach's Alpha值为0.810,信度较好。最后,在可行性方面,参与者回答了100%的问题,证明翻译是可访问的。结论DLOTCA翻译成智利西班牙语;它具有很高的可靠性,可以获得非常低偏差的结果,成为可以在智利人口中以相关方式使用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation study of the Chilean version of the Dynamic Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (DLOTCA)
Abstract Objective To validate the Chilean Spanish translation of the tenth English version of the Dynamic Loewestein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for use in the Chilean population. Method The translation into Chilean Spanish was carried out, and then a pilot test was carried out for the application of the instrument, for which 40 adults were recruited with an average age of 42.7 years, with various brain damages and made up of 70% women and 30% men. To evaluate the reliability of the instrument, Cronbach's Alpha was calculated as a measure of Internal Consistency, applying 3 perspectives, "Item-Total Reliability", "Item-Domain Reliability", and "Domain-Total Reliability". To measure feasibility, the percentage of items not answered by the sample is identified, and the percentage of items that is identified in the cognitive tests as understood. Results The Item-Total reliability yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.953, which translates into excellent reliability. Item-Domain reliability was mostly between excellent and good, with weak reliability for the factors "time orientation" and "visual perception". The Domain-Total reliability yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.810, which translates into good reliability. Finally, in relation to feasibility, the participants answered 100% of the items, evidencing the translation to be accessible. Conclusion The DLOTCA translated into Chilean Spanish; it presents a high reliability, which allows obtaining results with very low biases, becoming an instrument that can be used in a pertinent way in the Chilean population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信