制定婴幼儿饮食质量评分及其与体重的关系。

Elaine M Ríos, Olga Sinigaglia, Beatriz Diaz, Maribel Campos, Cristina Palacios
{"title":"制定婴幼儿饮食质量评分及其与体重的关系。","authors":"Elaine M Ríos, Olga Sinigaglia, Beatriz Diaz, Maribel Campos, Cristina Palacios","doi":"10.15226/jnhfs.2016.00171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a Diet Quality Index Score (DQIS) for infants and toddlers and to assess its relative validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three DQIS were created (0-5, 8-11 and 12-24 months) based on a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Nine components were included, scored from 0 (inadequate) to 5 (adequate consumption) based on guidelines for timing of food's introduction and portion sizes; the component on breastfeeding (Yes/No) was scored (0-15). Infants 6-7 months were excluded as new foods are introduced during this period. The total score (0-55 points) was categorized as Excellent (≥45), Good (35-44), Needs improvement (25-34), and Poor (<25). Relative validity was assessed against weight status among a sample of 296 children using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In infants 0-5 months (n=100), mean DQIS was 42.4±9.3 and 52% had 'Excellent' diets. In infants 8-11 months (n=42), mean DQIS was 36.1±7.7 and most had 'Good' diets (47.6%). Among toddlers 12-24 months (n=117), mean DQIS was 25.7±8.0 and most had 'Poor' diets (50.4%). There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight in those with 'Poor' diets compared to those with 'Excellent' diets, after controlling for confounders (OR 2.01; 95% CI: 0.85, 5.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These scores could be used to assess diet quality in infants and toddlers. There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight among those with 'Poor' diets. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm for the assessment of diet quality in infants and toddlers considering intake of each food group and their portion sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":90609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutritional health & food science","volume":"4 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5283385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Diet Quality Score for Infants and Toddlers and its association with weight.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine M Ríos, Olga Sinigaglia, Beatriz Diaz, Maribel Campos, Cristina Palacios\",\"doi\":\"10.15226/jnhfs.2016.00171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a Diet Quality Index Score (DQIS) for infants and toddlers and to assess its relative validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three DQIS were created (0-5, 8-11 and 12-24 months) based on a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Nine components were included, scored from 0 (inadequate) to 5 (adequate consumption) based on guidelines for timing of food's introduction and portion sizes; the component on breastfeeding (Yes/No) was scored (0-15). Infants 6-7 months were excluded as new foods are introduced during this period. The total score (0-55 points) was categorized as Excellent (≥45), Good (35-44), Needs improvement (25-34), and Poor (<25). Relative validity was assessed against weight status among a sample of 296 children using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In infants 0-5 months (n=100), mean DQIS was 42.4±9.3 and 52% had 'Excellent' diets. In infants 8-11 months (n=42), mean DQIS was 36.1±7.7 and most had 'Good' diets (47.6%). Among toddlers 12-24 months (n=117), mean DQIS was 25.7±8.0 and most had 'Poor' diets (50.4%). There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight in those with 'Poor' diets compared to those with 'Excellent' diets, after controlling for confounders (OR 2.01; 95% CI: 0.85, 5.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These scores could be used to assess diet quality in infants and toddlers. There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight among those with 'Poor' diets. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm for the assessment of diet quality in infants and toddlers considering intake of each food group and their portion sizes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nutritional health & food science\",\"volume\":\"4 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5283385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nutritional health & food science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15226/jnhfs.2016.00171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutritional health & food science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/jnhfs.2016.00171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为婴幼儿创建饮食质量指数评分(DQIS),并评估其相对有效性:为婴幼儿创建饮食质量指数(DQIS),并评估其相对有效性:设计:根据经过验证的食物频率问卷(FFQ),创建了三个 DQIS(0-5 个月、8-11 个月和 12-24 个月)。其中包括九项内容,根据食物引入时间和份量指南,从 0 分(摄入不足)到 5 分(摄入充足)不等;母乳喂养内容(是/否)的评分为 0-15 分。6-7个月的婴儿不包括在内,因为这一时期会添加新的食物。总分(0-55 分)分为优(≥45 分)、良(35-44 分)、需改进(25-34 分)和差(结果:0-5 个月婴儿(100 人)的 DQIS 平均值为 42.4±9.3,52% 的婴儿饮食为 "优"。在 8-11 个月的婴儿(42 人)中,DQIS 平均值为 36.1±7.7,大多数婴儿的饮食为 "良好"(47.6%)。在 12-24 个月的学步儿童(人数=117)中,DQIS 的平均值为 25.7±8.0,大多数饮食习惯为 "差"(50.4%)。在控制了混杂因素后(OR 2.01; 95% CI: 0.85, 5.18),与饮食 "优良 "的幼儿相比,饮食 "不良 "的幼儿体重超标的几率呈上升趋势:这些评分可用于评估婴幼儿的饮食质量。结论:这些评分可用于评估婴幼儿的饮食质量,饮食 "差 "的婴幼儿体重超标的几率较高。据我们所知,这是第一种评估婴幼儿饮食质量的算法,它考虑到了每类食物的摄入量及其份量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Diet Quality Score for Infants and Toddlers and its association with weight.

Objective: To create a Diet Quality Index Score (DQIS) for infants and toddlers and to assess its relative validity.

Design: Three DQIS were created (0-5, 8-11 and 12-24 months) based on a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Nine components were included, scored from 0 (inadequate) to 5 (adequate consumption) based on guidelines for timing of food's introduction and portion sizes; the component on breastfeeding (Yes/No) was scored (0-15). Infants 6-7 months were excluded as new foods are introduced during this period. The total score (0-55 points) was categorized as Excellent (≥45), Good (35-44), Needs improvement (25-34), and Poor (<25). Relative validity was assessed against weight status among a sample of 296 children using logistic regression.

Results: In infants 0-5 months (n=100), mean DQIS was 42.4±9.3 and 52% had 'Excellent' diets. In infants 8-11 months (n=42), mean DQIS was 36.1±7.7 and most had 'Good' diets (47.6%). Among toddlers 12-24 months (n=117), mean DQIS was 25.7±8.0 and most had 'Poor' diets (50.4%). There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight in those with 'Poor' diets compared to those with 'Excellent' diets, after controlling for confounders (OR 2.01; 95% CI: 0.85, 5.18).

Conclusions: These scores could be used to assess diet quality in infants and toddlers. There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight among those with 'Poor' diets. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm for the assessment of diet quality in infants and toddlers considering intake of each food group and their portion sizes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信