{"title":"解释新兴大国不愿采用干预规范:规范之争和责任等级","authors":"K. Kenkel, S. Destradi","doi":"10.1590/0034-7329201900102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that emerging powers’ reluctance to conform to new norms at the global level is grounded not in rejection of norms’ content, but in contestation of norms’ implementation, and of the hierarchical manner in which responsibility is defined and attributed. The assessment of Brazil and India’s approach to the issue of intervention supports our argument.","PeriodicalId":45317,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/0034-7329201900102","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining emerging powers’ reluctance to adopt intervention norms: normative contestation and hierarchies of responsibility\",\"authors\":\"K. Kenkel, S. Destradi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0034-7329201900102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We argue that emerging powers’ reluctance to conform to new norms at the global level is grounded not in rejection of norms’ content, but in contestation of norms’ implementation, and of the hierarchical manner in which responsibility is defined and attributed. The assessment of Brazil and India’s approach to the issue of intervention supports our argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/0034-7329201900102\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201900102\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201900102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Explaining emerging powers’ reluctance to adopt intervention norms: normative contestation and hierarchies of responsibility
We argue that emerging powers’ reluctance to conform to new norms at the global level is grounded not in rejection of norms’ content, but in contestation of norms’ implementation, and of the hierarchical manner in which responsibility is defined and attributed. The assessment of Brazil and India’s approach to the issue of intervention supports our argument.