{"title":"第一部机构法案:1964年政变后的卡洛斯·梅代罗斯·席尔瓦和最高法院","authors":"Mateus Gamba Torres","doi":"10.15175/1984-2503-20168304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constitutional Act Number 1 established the first repressive guideline to legislatively protect the 1964 coup and the authoritarian attitudes adopted by the military forces after overthrowing Joao Goulart. Lawyers such as Carlos Medeiros Silva, along with ministers from the Supreme Federal Court (STF), pored over the new legislation during the period, appearing as it did within the Brazilian legal framework and modifying the Constitution. Support from the Constitutional Court for the coup was fundamental to the inclusion of the institutional act in the Brazilian legal system. Methodologically speaking, we employ the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu’s legal field, with characteristics related to its debate on institutional autonomy and the monopoly of the truth, analyzing press, biographies and legal articles developed by Carlos Medeiros da Silva that justified the granting of Institutional Acts by the dictatorship and their inclusion in the Brazilian “legal system”.","PeriodicalId":41789,"journal":{"name":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","volume":"8 1","pages":"489-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O primeiro Ato Institucional: Carlos Medeiros Silva e o STF no pós-Golpe de 1964\",\"authors\":\"Mateus Gamba Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.15175/1984-2503-20168304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Constitutional Act Number 1 established the first repressive guideline to legislatively protect the 1964 coup and the authoritarian attitudes adopted by the military forces after overthrowing Joao Goulart. Lawyers such as Carlos Medeiros Silva, along with ministers from the Supreme Federal Court (STF), pored over the new legislation during the period, appearing as it did within the Brazilian legal framework and modifying the Constitution. Support from the Constitutional Court for the coup was fundamental to the inclusion of the institutional act in the Brazilian legal system. Methodologically speaking, we employ the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu’s legal field, with characteristics related to its debate on institutional autonomy and the monopoly of the truth, analyzing press, biographies and legal articles developed by Carlos Medeiros da Silva that justified the granting of Institutional Acts by the dictatorship and their inclusion in the Brazilian “legal system”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"489-505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
第一号宪法法案确立了第一个镇压方针,以立法保护1964年的政变和军队在推翻若昂·古拉特后采取的独裁态度。在此期间,Carlos Medeiros Silva等律师与最高联邦法院(STF)的部长们一起仔细研究了这项新立法,因为它在巴西法律框架内出现并修改了宪法。宪法法院对政变的支持对于将制度性行为纳入巴西法律体系至关重要。从方法论上讲,我们采用皮埃尔·布迪厄法律领域的视角,其特征与机构自治和真相垄断的辩论有关,分析卡洛斯·梅代罗斯·达席尔瓦(Carlos Medeiros da Silva)撰写的新闻、传记和法律文章,这些文章证明了独裁政权授予机构法案并将其纳入巴西“法律体系”是合理的。
O primeiro Ato Institucional: Carlos Medeiros Silva e o STF no pós-Golpe de 1964
Constitutional Act Number 1 established the first repressive guideline to legislatively protect the 1964 coup and the authoritarian attitudes adopted by the military forces after overthrowing Joao Goulart. Lawyers such as Carlos Medeiros Silva, along with ministers from the Supreme Federal Court (STF), pored over the new legislation during the period, appearing as it did within the Brazilian legal framework and modifying the Constitution. Support from the Constitutional Court for the coup was fundamental to the inclusion of the institutional act in the Brazilian legal system. Methodologically speaking, we employ the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu’s legal field, with characteristics related to its debate on institutional autonomy and the monopoly of the truth, analyzing press, biographies and legal articles developed by Carlos Medeiros da Silva that justified the granting of Institutional Acts by the dictatorship and their inclusion in the Brazilian “legal system”.