{"title":"19世纪20年代和30年代巴西帝国宫廷城市的无纪律、警惕和非法生产","authors":"Luciano Rocha Pinto","doi":"10.15175/1984-2503-20168202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Empire of Brazil’s city-court (Rio de Janeiro), a concern with order produced a series of daily interventions by public authorities aiming to target indiscipline. The Termos de Bem Viver [Terms for Living Well] agreed upon at the Police Intendancy and the City Council’s Registros de Infracao de Posturas [Records of Violations of the City Code] suggest an urban space marked by punishment and disciplinary techniques. This article seeks to reveal the resistance and the discrepancy between the punitive powers and the crimes committed in order to highlight the generalization inherent to the supervisory perspective, where even those monitoring are monitored by others.","PeriodicalId":41789,"journal":{"name":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","volume":"8 1","pages":"233-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indisciplina, vigilância e produção da ilegalidade na cidade-corte do império do Brasil (décadas de 1820 e 1830)\",\"authors\":\"Luciano Rocha Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.15175/1984-2503-20168202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Empire of Brazil’s city-court (Rio de Janeiro), a concern with order produced a series of daily interventions by public authorities aiming to target indiscipline. The Termos de Bem Viver [Terms for Living Well] agreed upon at the Police Intendancy and the City Council’s Registros de Infracao de Posturas [Records of Violations of the City Code] suggest an urban space marked by punishment and disciplinary techniques. This article seeks to reveal the resistance and the discrepancy between the punitive powers and the crimes committed in order to highlight the generalization inherent to the supervisory perspective, where even those monitoring are monitored by others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"233-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在巴西帝国的城市法院(里约热内卢de Janeiro),出于对秩序的关注,公共当局采取了一系列日常干预措施,旨在打击违纪行为。警察管理部门和市议会的《违反城市法规记录》(Registros de Infracao de Posturas)达成的《生活条件》(Termos de Bem Viver)建议建立一个以惩罚和纪律手段为标志的城市空间。本文试图揭示惩罚权力与犯罪之间的阻力和差异,以突出监督视角固有的泛化性,即监督者也受到他人的监督。
Indisciplina, vigilância e produção da ilegalidade na cidade-corte do império do Brasil (décadas de 1820 e 1830)
In the Empire of Brazil’s city-court (Rio de Janeiro), a concern with order produced a series of daily interventions by public authorities aiming to target indiscipline. The Termos de Bem Viver [Terms for Living Well] agreed upon at the Police Intendancy and the City Council’s Registros de Infracao de Posturas [Records of Violations of the City Code] suggest an urban space marked by punishment and disciplinary techniques. This article seeks to reveal the resistance and the discrepancy between the punitive powers and the crimes committed in order to highlight the generalization inherent to the supervisory perspective, where even those monitoring are monitored by others.