齐美尔和舒茨的外国人社会学中的形式主义和概括

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY
M. Mello
{"title":"齐美尔和舒茨的外国人社会学中的形式主义和概括","authors":"M. Mello","doi":"10.15175/1984-2503-20157306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work critically analyzes the sociological forms of Georg Simmel and Alfred Schutz’s strangers. Both authors, each in their own way, and true to their style, wrote about immigrants and immigration in a manner which was influenced by their own biographies. This influence reveals itself in their sociological understanding of the stranger as a social type, however both works feature excessively formalist definitions that do not touch upon the wealth of the communication involved in the relationship between the cultural native and the stranger. The potential for cognitive innovation and epistemological advances facilitated by the phenomenon of immigration therefore remain unexplored. The work departs from a comparative analysis between these key works by both authors in their treatment of this relationship.","PeriodicalId":41789,"journal":{"name":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","volume":"7 1","pages":"533-555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formalismo e Generalização nas sociologias do estrangeiro de Simmel e Schutz\",\"authors\":\"M. Mello\",\"doi\":\"10.15175/1984-2503-20157306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work critically analyzes the sociological forms of Georg Simmel and Alfred Schutz’s strangers. Both authors, each in their own way, and true to their style, wrote about immigrants and immigration in a manner which was influenced by their own biographies. This influence reveals itself in their sociological understanding of the stranger as a social type, however both works feature excessively formalist definitions that do not touch upon the wealth of the communication involved in the relationship between the cultural native and the stranger. The potential for cognitive innovation and epistemological advances facilitated by the phenomenon of immigration therefore remain unexplored. The work departs from a comparative analysis between these key works by both authors in their treatment of this relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"533-555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20157306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20157306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文批判性地分析了齐美尔和舒茨的《陌生人》的社会学形式。两位作者都以自己的方式,忠实于自己的风格,以一种受自己传记影响的方式写移民和移民。这种影响体现在他们对陌生人作为一种社会类型的社会学理解上,然而,这两部作品都以过度的形式主义定义为特征,没有触及文化本地人和陌生人之间关系中所涉及的交流的财富。因此,移民现象促进认知创新和认识论进步的潜力仍未得到探索。本书的出发点是对两位作者处理这种关系的关键著作进行比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formalismo e Generalização nas sociologias do estrangeiro de Simmel e Schutz
This work critically analyzes the sociological forms of Georg Simmel and Alfred Schutz’s strangers. Both authors, each in their own way, and true to their style, wrote about immigrants and immigration in a manner which was influenced by their own biographies. This influence reveals itself in their sociological understanding of the stranger as a social type, however both works feature excessively formalist definitions that do not touch upon the wealth of the communication involved in the relationship between the cultural native and the stranger. The potential for cognitive innovation and epistemological advances facilitated by the phenomenon of immigration therefore remain unexplored. The work departs from a comparative analysis between these key works by both authors in their treatment of this relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信