19世纪哥斯达黎加的科学争论:气象学的案例

R. Bolaños
{"title":"19世纪哥斯达黎加的科学争论:气象学的案例","authors":"R. Bolaños","doi":"10.15517/RE.V0I33.27351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to analyze the main factors that led to a series of scientific controversies linked with the institutionalization of meteorology as a scientific activity in Costa Rica. The foundation of the National Meteorological Observatory (1887) and later the National Meteorological Institute (1888), brought a debate on the validity of meteorological observations in the country before the founding of the first institution. This question provoked an intense debate involving Henri Pittier, director of the Meteorological Institute and other actors members of the Costa Rican scientific community (Enrique Villavicencio, Pedro Nolasco Gutierrez, Carlos Francisco Salazar, Jose Moreno and Juan Fernandez Ferraz). They questioned the validity of the work of the scientific entity in the meteorological field. The background of this controversy is linked to the closure of the University of St. Thomas (1888) and the growing support that provided the Costa Rican government to scientists projects of Pittier. This author and his interlocutors discussed their ideas in the media of the time and their controversy not infrequently transcended the scientific field to the personal one.","PeriodicalId":31478,"journal":{"name":"Revista Estudios","volume":"544 1","pages":"10-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Las polémicas científicas en la Costa Rica del siglo XIX: El caso de la meteorología\",\"authors\":\"R. Bolaños\",\"doi\":\"10.15517/RE.V0I33.27351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to analyze the main factors that led to a series of scientific controversies linked with the institutionalization of meteorology as a scientific activity in Costa Rica. The foundation of the National Meteorological Observatory (1887) and later the National Meteorological Institute (1888), brought a debate on the validity of meteorological observations in the country before the founding of the first institution. This question provoked an intense debate involving Henri Pittier, director of the Meteorological Institute and other actors members of the Costa Rican scientific community (Enrique Villavicencio, Pedro Nolasco Gutierrez, Carlos Francisco Salazar, Jose Moreno and Juan Fernandez Ferraz). They questioned the validity of the work of the scientific entity in the meteorological field. The background of this controversy is linked to the closure of the University of St. Thomas (1888) and the growing support that provided the Costa Rican government to scientists projects of Pittier. This author and his interlocutors discussed their ideas in the media of the time and their controversy not infrequently transcended the scientific field to the personal one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Estudios\",\"volume\":\"544 1\",\"pages\":\"10-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Estudios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15517/RE.V0I33.27351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Estudios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/RE.V0I33.27351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析导致哥斯达黎加气象学作为一项科学活动制度化相关的一系列科学争议的主要因素。国家气象台(1887年)和后来的国家气象研究所(1888年)的成立,在第一个机构成立之前,在该国引起了关于气象观测有效性的辩论。这个问题引发了一场激烈的辩论,涉及气象研究所所长Henri Pittier和哥斯达黎加科学界的其他成员(Enrique Villavicencio、Pedro Nolasco Gutierrez、Carlos Francisco Salazar、Jose Moreno和Juan Fernandez Ferraz)。他们质疑该科学机构在气象领域工作的有效性。这场争论的背景与圣托马斯大学(1888年)的关闭以及哥斯达黎加政府对Pittier的科学家项目的越来越多的支持有关。作者和他的对话者在当时的媒体上讨论了他们的观点,他们的争论经常超越科学领域到个人领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Las polémicas científicas en la Costa Rica del siglo XIX: El caso de la meteorología
This article aims to analyze the main factors that led to a series of scientific controversies linked with the institutionalization of meteorology as a scientific activity in Costa Rica. The foundation of the National Meteorological Observatory (1887) and later the National Meteorological Institute (1888), brought a debate on the validity of meteorological observations in the country before the founding of the first institution. This question provoked an intense debate involving Henri Pittier, director of the Meteorological Institute and other actors members of the Costa Rican scientific community (Enrique Villavicencio, Pedro Nolasco Gutierrez, Carlos Francisco Salazar, Jose Moreno and Juan Fernandez Ferraz). They questioned the validity of the work of the scientific entity in the meteorological field. The background of this controversy is linked to the closure of the University of St. Thomas (1888) and the growing support that provided the Costa Rican government to scientists projects of Pittier. This author and his interlocutors discussed their ideas in the media of the time and their controversy not infrequently transcended the scientific field to the personal one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信