半干旱环境下耕作方式和耕作制度对杂草生物量的影响

IF 0.8 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Mehmood-ul-Hassan, A. Qayyum, A. Sher, M. Tahir, M. Azeem, A. Fareed
{"title":"半干旱环境下耕作方式和耕作制度对杂草生物量的影响","authors":"Mehmood-ul-Hassan, A. Qayyum, A. Sher, M. Tahir, M. Azeem, A. Fareed","doi":"10.1590/s0100-83582020380100031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tillage practice has a significant role on weeds eradication and soil water conservation in crop production. Under semiarid agriculture, the monsoon rains (65%) are major source of water in Potohar, Pakistan, which can effectively be used mostly for winter crops production. To evaluate the impact of different tillage system for prevailing cropping systems and their weeds biomass under semiarid conditions, field experiment was conducted at the Arid University Research Farm Koont Rawalpindi (Pakistan) during crop growth seasons 2013-14 and 2014-15. Tillage systems as treatments were (a) three cultivations with a cultivator, as control treatment, (b) mold-board with two cultivations, (c) chisel-plough with two cultivations and (d) minimum tillage (only tillage performed at sowing time) with glyphosate. Sowing was made using drill for all cropping systems i.e. a, b, and d except c which was planted on bed (made by bed planter). In addition to ploughing treatments, different cropping systems (a) wheat fallow (b) wheat and brassica fallow, (c) wheat and chickpea fallow and (d) wheat cluster bean (green manure crop) were also used for minimum two years rotations. On average in both study years, interactive effect of treatments (mold board with 2 cultivations) for the rotation wheat and brassica fallow showed a reduction in weeds dry biomass of Anagallis arvensis (blue pimpernel, 55.6%), Asphodelus tenuifolius (jungle onion, 42.3%), Chenopodium album (common goosefoot, 40.8%), Circium arvense (creeping thistle, 53.1%), Convolvulus arvensis (field bind weed, 56.6%) and Cynodon dactylon (vilfa stellata, 45.8%) within 60 days after sowing (DAS) as compared with the control treatment (three cultivations on a wheat fallow cropping system). Similar trends were observed at the crop maturity stage. Results of the experiment showed that better weed biomass suppression can be achieved by using moldboard plough for cultivation with followed by wheatbrassica cropping system and/or wheat chickpea intercropping for semiarid soil condition in Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":20102,"journal":{"name":"Planta Daninha","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weeds Biomass as Affected by Tillage Practices and Cropping Systems under a Semiarid Environment\",\"authors\":\"Mehmood-ul-Hassan, A. Qayyum, A. Sher, M. Tahir, M. Azeem, A. Fareed\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0100-83582020380100031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tillage practice has a significant role on weeds eradication and soil water conservation in crop production. Under semiarid agriculture, the monsoon rains (65%) are major source of water in Potohar, Pakistan, which can effectively be used mostly for winter crops production. To evaluate the impact of different tillage system for prevailing cropping systems and their weeds biomass under semiarid conditions, field experiment was conducted at the Arid University Research Farm Koont Rawalpindi (Pakistan) during crop growth seasons 2013-14 and 2014-15. Tillage systems as treatments were (a) three cultivations with a cultivator, as control treatment, (b) mold-board with two cultivations, (c) chisel-plough with two cultivations and (d) minimum tillage (only tillage performed at sowing time) with glyphosate. Sowing was made using drill for all cropping systems i.e. a, b, and d except c which was planted on bed (made by bed planter). In addition to ploughing treatments, different cropping systems (a) wheat fallow (b) wheat and brassica fallow, (c) wheat and chickpea fallow and (d) wheat cluster bean (green manure crop) were also used for minimum two years rotations. On average in both study years, interactive effect of treatments (mold board with 2 cultivations) for the rotation wheat and brassica fallow showed a reduction in weeds dry biomass of Anagallis arvensis (blue pimpernel, 55.6%), Asphodelus tenuifolius (jungle onion, 42.3%), Chenopodium album (common goosefoot, 40.8%), Circium arvense (creeping thistle, 53.1%), Convolvulus arvensis (field bind weed, 56.6%) and Cynodon dactylon (vilfa stellata, 45.8%) within 60 days after sowing (DAS) as compared with the control treatment (three cultivations on a wheat fallow cropping system). Similar trends were observed at the crop maturity stage. Results of the experiment showed that better weed biomass suppression can be achieved by using moldboard plough for cultivation with followed by wheatbrassica cropping system and/or wheat chickpea intercropping for semiarid soil condition in Pakistan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planta Daninha\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planta Daninha\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planta Daninha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在作物生产中,耕作方式对除杂草和保持水土具有重要作用。在半干旱农业中,季风雨(65%)是巴基斯坦Potohar的主要水源,可有效地用于冬季作物生产。为了评估半干旱条件下不同耕作制度对主要种植制度及其杂草生物量的影响,于2013-14和2014-15作物生长季在巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第干旱大学研究农场进行了田间试验。作为对照处理的耕作系统为:(a)使用一台耕作机进行三次耕作,(b)使用板犁进行两次耕作,(c)使用凿子犁进行两次耕作,以及(d)使用草甘膦进行少量耕作(仅在播种时进行耕作)。除c种在床上(由床上播种机)播种外,所有种植制度即a、b和d都使用钻播。除耕作处理外,不同的种植制度(a)小麦休耕(b)小麦和芸苔休耕,(c)小麦和鹰嘴豆休耕以及(d)小麦丛豆(绿肥作物)也至少轮作两年。在两个研究年度中,小麦和芸苔轮作处理(霉板+ 2个栽培)的交互作用平均显示,黑尾草(蓝花,55.6%)、细叶黄藤(丛林洋葱,42.3%)、藜草(普通鹅足,40.8%)、环草(匍匐蓟,53.1%)、卷叶草(野结草,56.6%)和长尾草(星形草)的干生物量减少。45.8%)在播种后60天内(DAS)与对照处理(小麦休耕制度的三次栽培)相比。在作物成熟期也观察到类似的趋势。试验结果表明,在巴基斯坦半干旱土壤条件下,采用板犁耕作、麦芥间作和(或)麦鹰嘴豆间作能较好地抑制杂草生物量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weeds Biomass as Affected by Tillage Practices and Cropping Systems under a Semiarid Environment
Tillage practice has a significant role on weeds eradication and soil water conservation in crop production. Under semiarid agriculture, the monsoon rains (65%) are major source of water in Potohar, Pakistan, which can effectively be used mostly for winter crops production. To evaluate the impact of different tillage system for prevailing cropping systems and their weeds biomass under semiarid conditions, field experiment was conducted at the Arid University Research Farm Koont Rawalpindi (Pakistan) during crop growth seasons 2013-14 and 2014-15. Tillage systems as treatments were (a) three cultivations with a cultivator, as control treatment, (b) mold-board with two cultivations, (c) chisel-plough with two cultivations and (d) minimum tillage (only tillage performed at sowing time) with glyphosate. Sowing was made using drill for all cropping systems i.e. a, b, and d except c which was planted on bed (made by bed planter). In addition to ploughing treatments, different cropping systems (a) wheat fallow (b) wheat and brassica fallow, (c) wheat and chickpea fallow and (d) wheat cluster bean (green manure crop) were also used for minimum two years rotations. On average in both study years, interactive effect of treatments (mold board with 2 cultivations) for the rotation wheat and brassica fallow showed a reduction in weeds dry biomass of Anagallis arvensis (blue pimpernel, 55.6%), Asphodelus tenuifolius (jungle onion, 42.3%), Chenopodium album (common goosefoot, 40.8%), Circium arvense (creeping thistle, 53.1%), Convolvulus arvensis (field bind weed, 56.6%) and Cynodon dactylon (vilfa stellata, 45.8%) within 60 days after sowing (DAS) as compared with the control treatment (three cultivations on a wheat fallow cropping system). Similar trends were observed at the crop maturity stage. Results of the experiment showed that better weed biomass suppression can be achieved by using moldboard plough for cultivation with followed by wheatbrassica cropping system and/or wheat chickpea intercropping for semiarid soil condition in Pakistan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Planta Daninha
Planta Daninha Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Planta Daninha is a scientific journal published by the Brazilian Society of Weed Science (SBCPD - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas). Papers submitted for publication must be sent through an electronic system, on http://www.scielo.br/pd. Works may be written in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, and will be accepted after being reviewed and approved by the Editorial Board. Only papers that have not been published or submitted for publication in other media will be accepted. Articles in Portuguese will be translated to English after being properly corrected and authorized by the authors. Planta Daninha has with goal to publish genuine technical-scientific papers and literature reviews from a critical perspective on Biology, weed management, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信