波兰的buderi(硅藻科)

Sylwia Cichoń
{"title":"波兰的buderi(硅藻科)","authors":"Sylwia Cichoń","doi":"10.1515/PBJ-2016-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Craticula buderi (Hustedt) Lange-Bertalot was established by Hustedt in 1954 as Navicula buderi, after which this diatom was transferred to the genus Craticula by Lange-Bertalot (Rumrich et al. 2000). I found several specimens of C. buderi in the Chechło River in southern Poland during diatomological studies of this area. Craticula buderi is known from North America (USA; e.g., Bahls 2009), South America (Colombia; e.g., MontoyaMoreno et al. 2013), Australia (Queensland) and New Zealand (Bostock & Holland 2010), and the Middle East (Israel; Tsarenko et al. 2000). In the Arctic it is known from Ellesmere Island (Michelutti et al. 2013), and in Europe from Great Britain (Hartley et al. 1986), Germany (Hofmann et al. 2013) and Romania (Cărăuş 2012). This diatom is widespread in Central Europe, where it is known from water of high calcium content and moderate to higher electric conductivity, including saline water (Lange-Bertalot 2001; Bąk et al. 2012; Pliński & Witkowski 2013). Previously the species was reported only from two localities in northern and central Poland (Dziengo 2003; Żelazna-Wieczorek 2011; Fig. 1). There is little published data on the distribution of C. buderi in Poland. For the diatom names regarded as synonyms of Craticula buderi (Navicula pseudohalophila Cholnoky 1960, Navicula adsidua R. E. M. Archibald 1971) I found no information on their distribution in Poland. Other Navicula species similar to Craticula buderi [Navicula simplex Krasske, N. halophila (Grunow) Cleve] are known from Poland (Siemińska & Wołowski 2003). Navicula simplex Krasske is known from the Baltic coastal zone (Rumek 1948; Mańkowski & Rumek 1975; Ringer 1985), the Mazurian area (Chudyba 1979), the Vistula River near Warsaw (Wysocka 1952; Tyszka-Mackiewicz 1983) and a fish pond in Mydlniki near Kraków (Siemińska 1947). The last diatom that can be mistaken for Craticula buderi is Navicula halophila [= Craticula halophila (Grunow ex Van Heurck) Mann]. Craticula buderi was regarded as a synonym of Navicula halophila by Krammer and Lange-Bertalot (1986). Now these two species are treated as separate taxa, Craticula buderi and C. halophila, which differ considerably in valve shape and size (Lange-Bertalot 2001). Craticula halophila is well known from saline springs and waters of high to very high electrolyte content. This publication discusses the distribution of Craticula buderi in Poland and provides brief information about its morphological variability in LM and SEM, observed in the samples collected from the Chechło River.","PeriodicalId":56362,"journal":{"name":"Polish Botanical Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"301-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Craticula buderi (Bacillariophyceae) in Poland\",\"authors\":\"Sylwia Cichoń\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/PBJ-2016-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Craticula buderi (Hustedt) Lange-Bertalot was established by Hustedt in 1954 as Navicula buderi, after which this diatom was transferred to the genus Craticula by Lange-Bertalot (Rumrich et al. 2000). I found several specimens of C. buderi in the Chechło River in southern Poland during diatomological studies of this area. Craticula buderi is known from North America (USA; e.g., Bahls 2009), South America (Colombia; e.g., MontoyaMoreno et al. 2013), Australia (Queensland) and New Zealand (Bostock & Holland 2010), and the Middle East (Israel; Tsarenko et al. 2000). In the Arctic it is known from Ellesmere Island (Michelutti et al. 2013), and in Europe from Great Britain (Hartley et al. 1986), Germany (Hofmann et al. 2013) and Romania (Cărăuş 2012). This diatom is widespread in Central Europe, where it is known from water of high calcium content and moderate to higher electric conductivity, including saline water (Lange-Bertalot 2001; Bąk et al. 2012; Pliński & Witkowski 2013). Previously the species was reported only from two localities in northern and central Poland (Dziengo 2003; Żelazna-Wieczorek 2011; Fig. 1). There is little published data on the distribution of C. buderi in Poland. For the diatom names regarded as synonyms of Craticula buderi (Navicula pseudohalophila Cholnoky 1960, Navicula adsidua R. E. M. Archibald 1971) I found no information on their distribution in Poland. Other Navicula species similar to Craticula buderi [Navicula simplex Krasske, N. halophila (Grunow) Cleve] are known from Poland (Siemińska & Wołowski 2003). Navicula simplex Krasske is known from the Baltic coastal zone (Rumek 1948; Mańkowski & Rumek 1975; Ringer 1985), the Mazurian area (Chudyba 1979), the Vistula River near Warsaw (Wysocka 1952; Tyszka-Mackiewicz 1983) and a fish pond in Mydlniki near Kraków (Siemińska 1947). The last diatom that can be mistaken for Craticula buderi is Navicula halophila [= Craticula halophila (Grunow ex Van Heurck) Mann]. Craticula buderi was regarded as a synonym of Navicula halophila by Krammer and Lange-Bertalot (1986). Now these two species are treated as separate taxa, Craticula buderi and C. halophila, which differ considerably in valve shape and size (Lange-Bertalot 2001). Craticula halophila is well known from saline springs and waters of high to very high electrolyte content. This publication discusses the distribution of Craticula buderi in Poland and provides brief information about its morphological variability in LM and SEM, observed in the samples collected from the Chechło River.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Botanical Journal\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"301-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Botanical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/PBJ-2016-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Botanical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/PBJ-2016-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Craticula buderi (Hustedt) Lange-Bertalot于1954年将其命名为Navicula buderi,之后Lange-Bertalot将这种硅藻转移到Craticula属(Rumrich et al. 2000)。在对波兰南部Chechło河进行硅藻学研究期间,我在该地区发现了几个布氏梭菌标本。凤眼蝶产于北美(美国;例如,Bahls 2009),南美洲(哥伦比亚;例如,MontoyaMoreno et al. 2013),澳大利亚(昆士兰)和新西兰(Bostock & Holland 2010),以及中东(以色列;Tsarenko et al. 2000)。在北极,它来自埃尔斯米尔岛(Michelutti等人,2013年),在欧洲来自英国(Hartley等人,1986年),德国(Hofmann等人,2013年)和罗马尼亚(cruu, 2012年)。这种硅藻在中欧广泛分布,因为那里的水钙含量高,电导率中等到较高,包括盐水(Lange-Bertalot 2001;Bąk et al. 2012;Pliński & Witkowski 2013)。以前只在波兰北部和中部的两个地方报道过该物种(Dziengo 2003;Żelazna-Wieczorek 2011;图1)关于布氏弓形虫在波兰分布的已发表数据很少。对于被认为是buderi硅藻同义词的硅藻名称(Navicula pseudohalophila Cholnoky 1960, Navicula adsidua R. E. M. Archibald 1971),我没有发现它们在波兰分布的资料。其他类似于buderi的Navicula [Navicula simplex Krasske, N. halophila (Grunow) Cleve]的Navicula种已知来自波兰(Siemińska & Wołowski 2003)。克拉斯克的Navicula simplex起源于波罗的海沿岸地区(Rumek 1948;Mańkowski & Rumek 1975;Ringer 1985),马祖里亚地区(Chudyba 1979),华沙附近的维斯瓦河(Wysocka 1952;Tyszka-Mackiewicz 1983)和Mydlniki附近Kraków (Siemińska 1947)的一个鱼塘。最后一种可能被误认为是褐藻的硅藻是褐藻[=褐藻(Grunow ex Van Heurck) Mann]。Krammer和Lange-Bertalot(1986)将其视为嗜盐Navicula halophila的同义词。现在,这两个物种被视为单独的分类群,Craticula buderi和C. halophila,它们在阀门的形状和大小上有很大的不同(Lange-Bertalot 2001)。嗜盐鱼以含盐泉水和电解质含量高到非常高的水而闻名。这篇文章讨论了在波兰的布德丽鱼的分布,并提供了从Chechło河收集的样品中观察到的在LM和SEM中其形态变化的简要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Craticula buderi (Bacillariophyceae) in Poland
Craticula buderi (Hustedt) Lange-Bertalot was established by Hustedt in 1954 as Navicula buderi, after which this diatom was transferred to the genus Craticula by Lange-Bertalot (Rumrich et al. 2000). I found several specimens of C. buderi in the Chechło River in southern Poland during diatomological studies of this area. Craticula buderi is known from North America (USA; e.g., Bahls 2009), South America (Colombia; e.g., MontoyaMoreno et al. 2013), Australia (Queensland) and New Zealand (Bostock & Holland 2010), and the Middle East (Israel; Tsarenko et al. 2000). In the Arctic it is known from Ellesmere Island (Michelutti et al. 2013), and in Europe from Great Britain (Hartley et al. 1986), Germany (Hofmann et al. 2013) and Romania (Cărăuş 2012). This diatom is widespread in Central Europe, where it is known from water of high calcium content and moderate to higher electric conductivity, including saline water (Lange-Bertalot 2001; Bąk et al. 2012; Pliński & Witkowski 2013). Previously the species was reported only from two localities in northern and central Poland (Dziengo 2003; Żelazna-Wieczorek 2011; Fig. 1). There is little published data on the distribution of C. buderi in Poland. For the diatom names regarded as synonyms of Craticula buderi (Navicula pseudohalophila Cholnoky 1960, Navicula adsidua R. E. M. Archibald 1971) I found no information on their distribution in Poland. Other Navicula species similar to Craticula buderi [Navicula simplex Krasske, N. halophila (Grunow) Cleve] are known from Poland (Siemińska & Wołowski 2003). Navicula simplex Krasske is known from the Baltic coastal zone (Rumek 1948; Mańkowski & Rumek 1975; Ringer 1985), the Mazurian area (Chudyba 1979), the Vistula River near Warsaw (Wysocka 1952; Tyszka-Mackiewicz 1983) and a fish pond in Mydlniki near Kraków (Siemińska 1947). The last diatom that can be mistaken for Craticula buderi is Navicula halophila [= Craticula halophila (Grunow ex Van Heurck) Mann]. Craticula buderi was regarded as a synonym of Navicula halophila by Krammer and Lange-Bertalot (1986). Now these two species are treated as separate taxa, Craticula buderi and C. halophila, which differ considerably in valve shape and size (Lange-Bertalot 2001). Craticula halophila is well known from saline springs and waters of high to very high electrolyte content. This publication discusses the distribution of Craticula buderi in Poland and provides brief information about its morphological variability in LM and SEM, observed in the samples collected from the Chechło River.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Botanical Journal is an international journal publishing original papers covering various aspects of vegetation science, plant and fungi biodiversity, biosystematics (including plant anatomy, cytology and embryology), phytogeography, evolution and ecology. All papers are considered by at least two reviewers. Polish Botanical Journal is issued twice per year. The two issues form one annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信