这是战斗的符号

IF 0.1 3区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.1515/bgsl-2022-0036

K. Berg

{"title":"这是战斗的符号","authors":"K. Berg","doi":"10.1515/bgsl-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": With today’s large diachronic text collections, we can ask new questions that are (in a wider sense) related to the notion of productivity: When is a new formation attested for the first time? Does it remain a nonce formation, or does it become institutionalized, and if so, at what speed? The German word formation pattern -nis is relevant in some of these regards: Even though it is (and has been) only marginally productive, it was responsible for a number of formations that were quickly lexicalized. In this paper, I shed some light on the relation between productivity, lexicalization, and the loss of productivity","PeriodicalId":42934,"journal":{"name":"BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR","volume":"144 1","pages":"545 - 572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Produktivität, Lexikalisierung und Rückbau\",\"authors\":\"K. Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bgsl-2022-0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": With today’s large diachronic text collections, we can ask new questions that are (in a wider sense) related to the notion of productivity: When is a new formation attested for the first time? Does it remain a nonce formation, or does it become institutionalized, and if so, at what speed? The German word formation pattern -nis is relevant in some of these regards: Even though it is (and has been) only marginally productive, it was responsible for a number of formations that were quickly lexicalized. In this paper, I shed some light on the relation between productivity, lexicalization, and the loss of productivity\",\"PeriodicalId\":42934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"545 - 572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2022-0036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2022-0036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

使用今天的大型历时文本集合，我们可以提出(在更广泛的意义上)与生产力概念相关的新问题:什么时候第一次证明了一个新的地层?它是否仍然是一个临时的形成，或者它是否变得制度化，如果是，以什么速度?德语的构词模式-nis在其中一些方面是相关的:尽管它现在(并且一直)只具有有限的生产力，但它负责许多迅速被词汇化的构词。在本文中，我阐明了生产力、词汇化和生产力丧失之间的关系

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Produktivität, Lexikalisierung und Rückbau

: With today’s large diachronic text collections, we can ask new questions that are (in a wider sense) related to the notion of productivity: When is a new formation attested for the first time? Does it remain a nonce formation, or does it become institutionalized, and if so, at what speed? The German word formation pattern -nis is relevant in some of these regards: Even though it is (and has been) only marginally productive, it was responsible for a number of formations that were quickly lexicalized. In this paper, I shed some light on the relation between productivity, lexicalization, and the loss of productivity

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR Multiple-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) was founded by Hermann Paul and Wilhelm Braune in 1874. It publishes essays on diachronic linguistics and the history of German Literature from the beginnings to about 1600, as well as reviews of monographs and collected works in these fields. Whilst focusing on the German language and literature, it also contains contributions on Germanic languages (especially old Nordic) as well as middle Latin philology and interdisciplinary works.