{"title":"“恶心的食物,坏面包和无法估量的醉酒”:晚期拜占庭作家眼中的突厥人,蒙古人和拉丁人的膳食","authors":"I. Okhlupina","doi":"10.15826/adsv.2022.50.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the analysis of the accounts of the Late Byzantine writers about the food traditions and preferences of the Turks, Mongols, and Latins according to the works of Manuel II Palaiologos, George Pachymeres, Constantine Stilbes, and Demetrios Kydones. The aim of the investigation is to consider ethnographic accounts at Byzantine written sources as a way of food identification of the peoples and a marker of the “otherness” of “strangers” in the texts. The analysis of historical evidence of polemical, historiographical, and epistolographic works of the Byzantine intellectuals is complicated due to the nature of the kinds of Byzantine written sources. It is taken into account that the Byzantine authors often used traditional rhetorical models, imitated the language and style of ancient Greek and Roman authors and regularly used the allusions to the texts of the Holy Scriptures in their written works. The examples of the Byzantine authors’ ambiguous attitudes to joint meals with the Turks are considered in the paper. It has been shown that the judgments regarding joint meals with the Turks made by the same writer sometimes significantly vary. In some cases, the author’s estimation could be influenced by the personal attitude towards the participants in the meal, and his mood, self-awareness, as well as his taste preferences. The differences in the food habits of the Mongols, Turks, and Latins mentioned in the writings of Late Byzantine authors were often used to describe representatives of a different culture in a negative light and had little to do with historical realities, since they were a kind of inversion of Byzantine ideas about normal, “cultural” food, which should be eaten. It has been determined that these accounts often reproduced the stereotypes regarding the eating habits of the “barbarians” and nomadic peoples, which existed in Byzantine society and written tradition from the Antiquity on.","PeriodicalId":33782,"journal":{"name":"Antichnaia drevnost'' i srednie veka","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Disgusting Food, Bad Bread, and Immeasurable Drunkenness”: The Meals of the Turks, Mongols and Latins through the Eyes of Late Byzantine Authors\",\"authors\":\"I. Okhlupina\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/adsv.2022.50.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the analysis of the accounts of the Late Byzantine writers about the food traditions and preferences of the Turks, Mongols, and Latins according to the works of Manuel II Palaiologos, George Pachymeres, Constantine Stilbes, and Demetrios Kydones. The aim of the investigation is to consider ethnographic accounts at Byzantine written sources as a way of food identification of the peoples and a marker of the “otherness” of “strangers” in the texts. The analysis of historical evidence of polemical, historiographical, and epistolographic works of the Byzantine intellectuals is complicated due to the nature of the kinds of Byzantine written sources. It is taken into account that the Byzantine authors often used traditional rhetorical models, imitated the language and style of ancient Greek and Roman authors and regularly used the allusions to the texts of the Holy Scriptures in their written works. The examples of the Byzantine authors’ ambiguous attitudes to joint meals with the Turks are considered in the paper. It has been shown that the judgments regarding joint meals with the Turks made by the same writer sometimes significantly vary. In some cases, the author’s estimation could be influenced by the personal attitude towards the participants in the meal, and his mood, self-awareness, as well as his taste preferences. The differences in the food habits of the Mongols, Turks, and Latins mentioned in the writings of Late Byzantine authors were often used to describe representatives of a different culture in a negative light and had little to do with historical realities, since they were a kind of inversion of Byzantine ideas about normal, “cultural” food, which should be eaten. It has been determined that these accounts often reproduced the stereotypes regarding the eating habits of the “barbarians” and nomadic peoples, which existed in Byzantine society and written tradition from the Antiquity on.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antichnaia drevnost'' i srednie veka\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antichnaia drevnost'' i srednie veka\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/adsv.2022.50.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichnaia drevnost'' i srednie veka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/adsv.2022.50.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文根据Manuel II Palaiologos、George Pachymeres、Constantine Stilbes和Demetrios Kydones的作品,分析了晚期拜占庭作家关于突厥人、蒙古人和拉丁人的食物传统和偏好的描述。调查的目的是考虑拜占庭书面来源的民族志记录,作为人们食物识别的一种方式,以及文本中“陌生人”的“他者性”的标记。由于拜占庭文献来源的性质,对拜占庭知识分子的论战、史学和书信体作品的历史证据的分析是复杂的。考虑到拜占庭作家经常使用传统的修辞模式,模仿古希腊和罗马作家的语言和风格,并经常在他们的书面作品中使用对圣经文本的典故。本文考虑了拜占庭作者对与土耳其人共同进餐的模棱两可态度的例子。已经证明,同一作者对与土耳其人共同进餐的判断有时差别很大。在某些情况下,作者的估计可能会受到个人对用餐参与者的态度,他的情绪,自我意识以及他的口味偏好的影响。晚期拜占庭作家的著作中提到的蒙古人、突厥人和拉丁人饮食习惯的差异,经常被用来负面地描述不同文化的代表,与历史现实没有什么关系,因为它们是拜占庭人对正常的“文化”食物的一种颠覆,应该吃。人们已经确定,这些描述经常复制关于“野蛮人”和游牧民族的饮食习惯的刻板印象,这些习惯存在于拜占庭社会和古代的书面传统中。
“Disgusting Food, Bad Bread, and Immeasurable Drunkenness”: The Meals of the Turks, Mongols and Latins through the Eyes of Late Byzantine Authors
This article presents the analysis of the accounts of the Late Byzantine writers about the food traditions and preferences of the Turks, Mongols, and Latins according to the works of Manuel II Palaiologos, George Pachymeres, Constantine Stilbes, and Demetrios Kydones. The aim of the investigation is to consider ethnographic accounts at Byzantine written sources as a way of food identification of the peoples and a marker of the “otherness” of “strangers” in the texts. The analysis of historical evidence of polemical, historiographical, and epistolographic works of the Byzantine intellectuals is complicated due to the nature of the kinds of Byzantine written sources. It is taken into account that the Byzantine authors often used traditional rhetorical models, imitated the language and style of ancient Greek and Roman authors and regularly used the allusions to the texts of the Holy Scriptures in their written works. The examples of the Byzantine authors’ ambiguous attitudes to joint meals with the Turks are considered in the paper. It has been shown that the judgments regarding joint meals with the Turks made by the same writer sometimes significantly vary. In some cases, the author’s estimation could be influenced by the personal attitude towards the participants in the meal, and his mood, self-awareness, as well as his taste preferences. The differences in the food habits of the Mongols, Turks, and Latins mentioned in the writings of Late Byzantine authors were often used to describe representatives of a different culture in a negative light and had little to do with historical realities, since they were a kind of inversion of Byzantine ideas about normal, “cultural” food, which should be eaten. It has been determined that these accounts often reproduced the stereotypes regarding the eating habits of the “barbarians” and nomadic peoples, which existed in Byzantine society and written tradition from the Antiquity on.