“请以你的名字呼唤我”:错误的行为:从费伦齐到作为过程的立法。

Q4 Medicine
G. Riefolo
{"title":"“请以你的名字呼唤我”:错误的行为:从费伦齐到作为过程的立法。","authors":"G. Riefolo","doi":"10.1521/prev.2022.109.2.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is always hard for psychoanalysis to connect free associations and action. With Freud, action could be interpreted only when it referred to the transference; otherwise, action was a resistance to the possibility of free association. Unlike Freud, Ferenczi recognized the importance of the analyst's acting-out as the patient's unconscious request for experiences of trauma to be mobilized. By presenting a clinical case, the author offers the analyst's error as the mobilization of a traumatic block. The error activates a \"Process of enactment,\" whereas if the error is not considered positively, it is simply a mistake, or the loss of a creative opportunity.","PeriodicalId":39855,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Review","volume":"109 2 1","pages":"151-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Call Me by Your Name\\\": The Wrong Action: From Ferenczi to Enactment as a Process.\",\"authors\":\"G. Riefolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/prev.2022.109.2.151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is always hard for psychoanalysis to connect free associations and action. With Freud, action could be interpreted only when it referred to the transference; otherwise, action was a resistance to the possibility of free association. Unlike Freud, Ferenczi recognized the importance of the analyst's acting-out as the patient's unconscious request for experiences of trauma to be mobilized. By presenting a clinical case, the author offers the analyst's error as the mobilization of a traumatic block. The error activates a \\\"Process of enactment,\\\" whereas if the error is not considered positively, it is simply a mistake, or the loss of a creative opportunity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychoanalytic Review\",\"volume\":\"109 2 1\",\"pages\":\"151-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychoanalytic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2022.109.2.151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalytic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2022.109.2.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神分析总是很难把自由联想和行动联系起来。弗洛伊德认为,行为只有在涉及移情时才能被解释;否则,行动就是对自由联合可能性的抵制。与弗洛伊德不同的是,费伦齐认识到精神分析师的行为表现的重要性,因为病人无意识地要求调动创伤的经历。通过提出一个临床案例,作者提供了分析师的错误作为创伤阻滞的动员。这个错误激活了一个“制定过程”,而如果错误不被积极地看待,它只是一个错误,或者是失去了一个创造性的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Call Me by Your Name": The Wrong Action: From Ferenczi to Enactment as a Process.
It is always hard for psychoanalysis to connect free associations and action. With Freud, action could be interpreted only when it referred to the transference; otherwise, action was a resistance to the possibility of free association. Unlike Freud, Ferenczi recognized the importance of the analyst's acting-out as the patient's unconscious request for experiences of trauma to be mobilized. By presenting a clinical case, the author offers the analyst's error as the mobilization of a traumatic block. The error activates a "Process of enactment," whereas if the error is not considered positively, it is simply a mistake, or the loss of a creative opportunity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychoanalytic Review
Psychoanalytic Review Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: In six issues per year, The Psychoanalytic Review publishes peer-reviewed articles on a wide range of theoretical, clinical and cultural topics, including interdisciplinary studies, which help advance psychoanalytic theory and understanding of therapeutic process. Special Issues, organized by guest editors with recognized knowledge in a specific area within the field of psychoanalysis or intersecting with it, are an important feature of the Review. The journal also publishes reviews of books and films of interest to psychoanalysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信