人类胚胎的基因编辑:科学家之间的紧张和争议

Q2 Psychology

Estudos De Psicologia (campinas) Pub Date : 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1590/1982-0275202340e210091

Maria de Fátima de Souza Santos, Renan Harmes Eskinazi, T. Apostolidis, L. Dany

{"title":"人类胚胎的基因编辑:科学家之间的紧张和争议","authors":"Maria de Fátima de Souza Santos, Renan Harmes Eskinazi, T. Apostolidis, L. Dany","doi":"10.1590/1982-0275202340e210091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: This study analyzed the relation between the position of scientists on embryo editing and the different types of knowledge involved. Methods: A lexical analysis of 151 scientific articles in the PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted using the IRAMUTEQ software. Results: The results showed that gene editing in embryos is presented in two argumentative branches: the first refers to the editing technique and its possibilities; the second discusses the impacts of these techniques on the public arena. The results demonstrate a consensus regarding the potential of editing; however, dilemmas about its effectiveness were also highlighted. Conclusion: The presence of ethical conflicts with embryo editing among the specialists was evidenced especially regarding the birth of genetically modified babies. Therefore, gene editing is marked by conflicts that are not limited only to biological contexts, but that encompasses different aspects of social life.","PeriodicalId":11883,"journal":{"name":"Estudos De Psicologia (campinas)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gene editing of the human embryo: tensions and controversies among scientists\",\"authors\":\"Maria de Fátima de Souza Santos, Renan Harmes Eskinazi, T. Apostolidis, L. Dany\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1982-0275202340e210091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: This study analyzed the relation between the position of scientists on embryo editing and the different types of knowledge involved. Methods: A lexical analysis of 151 scientific articles in the PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted using the IRAMUTEQ software. Results: The results showed that gene editing in embryos is presented in two argumentative branches: the first refers to the editing technique and its possibilities; the second discusses the impacts of these techniques on the public arena. The results demonstrate a consensus regarding the potential of editing; however, dilemmas about its effectiveness were also highlighted. Conclusion: The presence of ethical conflicts with embryo editing among the specialists was evidenced especially regarding the birth of genetically modified babies. Therefore, gene editing is marked by conflicts that are not limited only to biological contexts, but that encompasses different aspects of social life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudos De Psicologia (campinas)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudos De Psicologia (campinas)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202340e210091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos De Psicologia (campinas)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202340e210091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:本研究分析了科学家对胚胎编辑的立场与涉及的不同类型知识之间的关系。方法:采用IRAMUTEQ软件对PubMed和Web of Science数据库中的151篇科学论文进行词法分析。结果:结果表明，胚胎基因编辑存在两个争论分支:第一个是指编辑技术及其可能性;第二部分讨论了这些技术对公共领域的影响。研究结果表明，人们对编辑的潜力达成了共识;然而，关于其有效性的困境也被突出。结论:专家之间存在胚胎编辑的伦理冲突，特别是关于转基因婴儿的出生。因此，基因编辑的特点是冲突不仅限于生物学背景，还包括社会生活的不同方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Gene editing of the human embryo: tensions and controversies among scientists

Abstract Objective: This study analyzed the relation between the position of scientists on embryo editing and the different types of knowledge involved. Methods: A lexical analysis of 151 scientific articles in the PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted using the IRAMUTEQ software. Results: The results showed that gene editing in embryos is presented in two argumentative branches: the first refers to the editing technique and its possibilities; the second discusses the impacts of these techniques on the public arena. The results demonstrate a consensus regarding the potential of editing; however, dilemmas about its effectiveness were also highlighted. Conclusion: The presence of ethical conflicts with embryo editing among the specialists was evidenced especially regarding the birth of genetically modified babies. Therefore, gene editing is marked by conflicts that are not limited only to biological contexts, but that encompasses different aspects of social life.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Estudos De Psicologia (campinas) Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

13 weeks

期刊介绍： Estudos de Psicologia (Psychological Studies) is a quarterly journal of the graduate psychology program at the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - Centro Ciências da Vida (Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas- Center of Life Sciences). Since its foundation in 1983, it has been encouraging contributions from national and international scientific communities, aiming to discuss and to promote the profession and research in Psychology through the publication of original articles, which bring relevant contributions to the field of Psychology. It also publishes theoretical and review papers as well as book reviews representing significant advances to the science and profession of Psychology.