一个尺码适合所有人吗?巴西多党制总统制下的投资组合分配分析

Q3 Social Sciences
Pedro Palotti, P. Cavalcante
{"title":"一个尺码适合所有人吗?巴西多党制总统制下的投资组合分配分析","authors":"Pedro Palotti, P. Cavalcante","doi":"10.1590/1807-01912018242427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State.","PeriodicalId":35314,"journal":{"name":"Opiniao Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1807-01912018242427","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Palotti, P. Cavalcante\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-01912018242427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Opiniao Publica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1807-01912018242427\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Opiniao Publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912018242427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opiniao Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912018242427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

总统们面临着任命谁担任内阁职务的两难境地。他们需要确保政府获得立法支持,同时在公共政策方面实现他们的目标。本文分析了巴西多党制下巴西总统的职务分配。本研究运用多项逻辑回归对一些假设进行检验,找出1990年至2016年四个不同政府部门的总统所采用的任命策略。为此,首先,我们创建了一个部委政治化指数(IMP),并采用聚类分析将这四个部分的部委汇总在一起。结果表明,政府核心职位的任命倾向于较少政治化。此外,在执行政治协调和国家典型职能的总统单位中,总统的个人提名更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
Presidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Opiniao Publica
Opiniao Publica Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Opinião Pública is quadrimestral publication of the Center for Studies on Public Opinion (CESOP) of the University fo Campinas, Brazil Created in 1993, its main objective is to establish a specialized academic vehicle to publish articles about theory and methodology in the field of public opinion, political and social behavior, and midia studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信