新热带单优势森林的鸟类群落是否有自己的特征?红胡杨林的案例

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
Cerne Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/01047760202228013015
A. Moura, R. Mariano, F. S. Machado, C. Souza, Wanderley Jorge da Silveira Junior, B. S. Correa, M. Fontes
{"title":"新热带单优势森林的鸟类群落是否有自己的特征?红胡杨林的案例","authors":"A. Moura, R. Mariano, F. S. Machado, C. Souza, Wanderley Jorge da Silveira Junior, B. S. Correa, M. Fontes","doi":"10.1590/01047760202228013015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Monodominant Eremanthus erythropappus forests are dispersed in neotropical montane regions of southeastern and northeastern Brazil, forming ecotonal areas among other high altitude phytophysiognomies, with no information from their fauna communities and how these communities vary between phytophysiognomies adjacent. We examined the bird community of three preserved and three managed E. erythropappus forests, and compared them two other coexisting phytophysiognomies (cloud forests and montane fields), being three samples of each, in an ecotonal region between two biodiversity hotspot domains (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest), in southeastern Brazil (1300 to 1570m high). Results: The bird community of the natural E. erythropappus forests was shared with other vegetation, while the managed E. erythropappus forests presented the lowest species richness. However, even though managed E. erythropappus forests has almost no exclusive elements, their community caused a balanced variation (a set of very similar species, only changing the representativeness), suggesting that the abundance of the registered species varies along these phytophysiognomies. Conclusion: The species associated with the natural E. erythropappus forests represented 50% of the total species, in contrast to the remaining 50% associated with the areas of cloud forests and montane fields, and their sharing behaves as an ecotonal community, since its community coincides with elements which are also present in the avifauna of the other two sampled phytophysiognomies. The composition of the avifauna from managed E. erythropappus forests was more similar to the community registered in the montane fields.","PeriodicalId":50705,"journal":{"name":"Cerne","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do bird communities of neotropical monodominant forests have their own identity? The case of Eremanthus erythropappus forests\",\"authors\":\"A. Moura, R. Mariano, F. S. Machado, C. Souza, Wanderley Jorge da Silveira Junior, B. S. Correa, M. Fontes\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/01047760202228013015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Monodominant Eremanthus erythropappus forests are dispersed in neotropical montane regions of southeastern and northeastern Brazil, forming ecotonal areas among other high altitude phytophysiognomies, with no information from their fauna communities and how these communities vary between phytophysiognomies adjacent. We examined the bird community of three preserved and three managed E. erythropappus forests, and compared them two other coexisting phytophysiognomies (cloud forests and montane fields), being three samples of each, in an ecotonal region between two biodiversity hotspot domains (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest), in southeastern Brazil (1300 to 1570m high). Results: The bird community of the natural E. erythropappus forests was shared with other vegetation, while the managed E. erythropappus forests presented the lowest species richness. However, even though managed E. erythropappus forests has almost no exclusive elements, their community caused a balanced variation (a set of very similar species, only changing the representativeness), suggesting that the abundance of the registered species varies along these phytophysiognomies. Conclusion: The species associated with the natural E. erythropappus forests represented 50% of the total species, in contrast to the remaining 50% associated with the areas of cloud forests and montane fields, and their sharing behaves as an ecotonal community, since its community coincides with elements which are also present in the avifauna of the other two sampled phytophysiognomies. The composition of the avifauna from managed E. erythropappus forests was more similar to the community registered in the montane fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerne\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760202228013015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerne","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760202228013015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:单优势红papus Eremanthus林分布在巴西东南部和东北部的新热带山区,在其他高海拔植物地貌之间形成了生态区,但没有关于其动物群落的信息,也没有关于这些群落在相邻植物地貌之间如何变化的信息。在巴西东南部海拔1300 ~ 1570米的塞拉多和大西洋森林之间的过渡带,研究了三种保存和三种管理的红papus林的鸟类群落,并比较了两种共存的植物地貌(云雾林和山地田)。结果:红杉天然林鸟类群落与其他植被共享,人工林物种丰富度最低;然而,尽管管理的红参林几乎没有排他的元素,但它们的群落引起了平衡的变化(一组非常相似的物种,只改变了代表性),这表明记录的物种丰度沿着这些植物地貌变化。结论:与云雾林和山地田区相关的物种占总物种的50%,而与天然红杉林相关的物种占总物种的50%,它们的共享表现为一个生态群落,因为它们的群落与其他两个植物地貌的鸟类区系中也存在的元素一致。经管理的红杉林鸟类的组成与山地田区鸟类更接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do bird communities of neotropical monodominant forests have their own identity? The case of Eremanthus erythropappus forests
Background: Monodominant Eremanthus erythropappus forests are dispersed in neotropical montane regions of southeastern and northeastern Brazil, forming ecotonal areas among other high altitude phytophysiognomies, with no information from their fauna communities and how these communities vary between phytophysiognomies adjacent. We examined the bird community of three preserved and three managed E. erythropappus forests, and compared them two other coexisting phytophysiognomies (cloud forests and montane fields), being three samples of each, in an ecotonal region between two biodiversity hotspot domains (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest), in southeastern Brazil (1300 to 1570m high). Results: The bird community of the natural E. erythropappus forests was shared with other vegetation, while the managed E. erythropappus forests presented the lowest species richness. However, even though managed E. erythropappus forests has almost no exclusive elements, their community caused a balanced variation (a set of very similar species, only changing the representativeness), suggesting that the abundance of the registered species varies along these phytophysiognomies. Conclusion: The species associated with the natural E. erythropappus forests represented 50% of the total species, in contrast to the remaining 50% associated with the areas of cloud forests and montane fields, and their sharing behaves as an ecotonal community, since its community coincides with elements which are also present in the avifauna of the other two sampled phytophysiognomies. The composition of the avifauna from managed E. erythropappus forests was more similar to the community registered in the montane fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cerne
Cerne 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cerne is a journal edited by the Federal University of Lavras, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, which quarterly publishes original articles that represent relevant contribution to Forestry Science development (Forest ecology, Forest Management, Silviculture, Technology of Forest Products).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信