“韩国国际政治经济学研究”

IF 0.1 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Seok-hyun Kim
{"title":"“韩国国际政治经济学研究”","authors":"Seok-hyun Kim","doi":"10.14731/kjis.2016.12.14.3.489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the past 30 years, IPE studies in Korea have achieved outstanding developments in terms of the amount of research, academic issues, applied methodologies, and targeted regions. Even though we have been through introductory and expansion periods of Korean IPE studies, we have been trying to move into an indigenous period. This study compares the first 50 years’ IPE studies with recent 10 years’ IPE studies in Korea. There have been many changes in IPE studies in Korea. First, the number of articles related to International Trade has dropped dramatically during the last 10 years, while the number of articles in the categories of Money-Finance and Development Assistance has increased rapidly. Second, there have been decreasing academic interests in Korea and the United States, while there have been growing interests in other countries in Asia, especially China. Third, there have been methodological changes in IPE studies in Korea. We have seen more studies that have utilized comparative and statistical methods, while the number of review articles dropped rapidly. Finally, the number of articles featuring theory introduction and comparison has decreased, while the number of articles featuring theory verification has increased in the last decade. In the academic field of IPE in Korea, scholars need to prepare for new developments in the global economy such as exponentially growing cross-border economic transactions, growing importance of non-state actors, rapid technological developments and the new industrial revolution. In the process of preparation, we need to search for indigenous IPE studies in Korea as well as to develop generalized IPE theories. We always need to consider striking a balance between academic universality and academic distinctiveness.","PeriodicalId":41543,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of International Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"489-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studies of International Political Economy in Korea\",\"authors\":\"Seok-hyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.14731/kjis.2016.12.14.3.489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the past 30 years, IPE studies in Korea have achieved outstanding developments in terms of the amount of research, academic issues, applied methodologies, and targeted regions. Even though we have been through introductory and expansion periods of Korean IPE studies, we have been trying to move into an indigenous period. This study compares the first 50 years’ IPE studies with recent 10 years’ IPE studies in Korea. There have been many changes in IPE studies in Korea. First, the number of articles related to International Trade has dropped dramatically during the last 10 years, while the number of articles in the categories of Money-Finance and Development Assistance has increased rapidly. Second, there have been decreasing academic interests in Korea and the United States, while there have been growing interests in other countries in Asia, especially China. Third, there have been methodological changes in IPE studies in Korea. We have seen more studies that have utilized comparative and statistical methods, while the number of review articles dropped rapidly. Finally, the number of articles featuring theory introduction and comparison has decreased, while the number of articles featuring theory verification has increased in the last decade. In the academic field of IPE in Korea, scholars need to prepare for new developments in the global economy such as exponentially growing cross-border economic transactions, growing importance of non-state actors, rapid technological developments and the new industrial revolution. In the process of preparation, we need to search for indigenous IPE studies in Korea as well as to develop generalized IPE theories. We always need to consider striking a balance between academic universality and academic distinctiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of International Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"489-506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of International Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2016.12.14.3.489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2016.12.14.3.489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的30年里,韩国的IPE研究在研究数量、学术问题、应用方法和目标区域等方面都取得了显著的发展。尽管我们已经经历了韩国IPE研究的入门期和扩张期,但我们一直在努力进入一个本土时期。本研究比较了韩国前50年的国际政治经济学研究与近10年的国际政治经济学研究。韩国的国际政治经济学研究发生了许多变化。首先,在过去十年中,与国际贸易有关的条款数量急剧减少,而货币-财政和发展援助类别的条款数量迅速增加。第二,韩国和美国的学术兴趣正在下降,而亚洲其他国家,特别是中国的兴趣却在增加。第三,韩国的国际政治经济学研究方法发生了变化。我们看到更多的研究使用比较和统计方法,而评论文章的数量迅速下降。最后,在过去十年中,以理论介绍和比较为主题的文章数量有所减少,而以理论验证为主题的文章数量有所增加。在韩国国际政治经济学的学术领域,学者们需要为全球经济的新发展做好准备,如指数级增长的跨境经济交易、非国家行为体日益重要、快速的技术发展和新产业革命。在准备过程中,我们需要寻找韩国本土的国际政治经济学研究,同时也需要发展普遍化的国际政治经济学理论。我们始终需要考虑在学术普遍性和学术独特性之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studies of International Political Economy in Korea
During the past 30 years, IPE studies in Korea have achieved outstanding developments in terms of the amount of research, academic issues, applied methodologies, and targeted regions. Even though we have been through introductory and expansion periods of Korean IPE studies, we have been trying to move into an indigenous period. This study compares the first 50 years’ IPE studies with recent 10 years’ IPE studies in Korea. There have been many changes in IPE studies in Korea. First, the number of articles related to International Trade has dropped dramatically during the last 10 years, while the number of articles in the categories of Money-Finance and Development Assistance has increased rapidly. Second, there have been decreasing academic interests in Korea and the United States, while there have been growing interests in other countries in Asia, especially China. Third, there have been methodological changes in IPE studies in Korea. We have seen more studies that have utilized comparative and statistical methods, while the number of review articles dropped rapidly. Finally, the number of articles featuring theory introduction and comparison has decreased, while the number of articles featuring theory verification has increased in the last decade. In the academic field of IPE in Korea, scholars need to prepare for new developments in the global economy such as exponentially growing cross-border economic transactions, growing importance of non-state actors, rapid technological developments and the new industrial revolution. In the process of preparation, we need to search for indigenous IPE studies in Korea as well as to develop generalized IPE theories. We always need to consider striking a balance between academic universality and academic distinctiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of International Studies
Korean Journal of International Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信