系统分析了增材制造与传统制造的比较研究，重点是物流作业的环境绩效

Q3 Engineering

Gestao e Producao Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0104-530x5289-20

T. L. Pilz, Bruna Nunes, M. Maceno, M. G. Cleto, R. Seleme

{"title":"系统分析了增材制造与传统制造的比较研究，重点是物流作业的环境绩效","authors":"T. L. Pilz, Bruna Nunes, M. Maceno, M. G. Cleto, R. Seleme","doi":"10.1590/0104-530x5289-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Based on the promise to revolutionize the entire supply chain, additive manufacturing is seen as an alternative to conventional manufacturing processes, since it simplifies the production of small batches, shortens the distances between production and consumption and generates new distribution models. Due to its huge potential to spread more sustainable environmental practices, investigations on the environmental assumptions, concerning the application of additive manufacturing technologies, are required. Therefore, based on a systematic literature review, this study aimed to analyze the studies that addressed the environmental performance of logistics operations in a comparison among conventional and additive manufacturing, using the Life Cycle Assessment technic (LCA). Although there are few available studies that quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental performance of the additive manufacturing process with traditional process from a transport perspective, it has been concluded that reducing the distances and the quantity of transported products, carbon dioxide emissions and the consumption of energy resources are reduced.","PeriodicalId":35415,"journal":{"name":"Gestao e Producao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic analysis of comparative studies between additive and conventional manufacturing focusing on the environmental performance of logistics operations\",\"authors\":\"T. L. Pilz, Bruna Nunes, M. Maceno, M. G. Cleto, R. Seleme\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0104-530x5289-20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Based on the promise to revolutionize the entire supply chain, additive manufacturing is seen as an alternative to conventional manufacturing processes, since it simplifies the production of small batches, shortens the distances between production and consumption and generates new distribution models. Due to its huge potential to spread more sustainable environmental practices, investigations on the environmental assumptions, concerning the application of additive manufacturing technologies, are required. Therefore, based on a systematic literature review, this study aimed to analyze the studies that addressed the environmental performance of logistics operations in a comparison among conventional and additive manufacturing, using the Life Cycle Assessment technic (LCA). Although there are few available studies that quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental performance of the additive manufacturing process with traditional process from a transport perspective, it has been concluded that reducing the distances and the quantity of transported products, carbon dioxide emissions and the consumption of energy resources are reduced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestao e Producao\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestao e Producao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x5289-20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestao e Producao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x5289-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要:增材制造有望彻底改变整个供应链，被视为传统制造工艺的替代方案，因为它简化了小批量生产，缩短了生产和消费之间的距离，并产生了新的分销模式。由于其传播更多可持续环境实践的巨大潜力，需要对有关增材制造技术应用的环境假设进行调查。因此，在系统文献综述的基础上，本研究旨在利用生命周期评估技术(LCA)对传统制造和增材制造中物流运营环境绩效的研究进行比较分析。虽然目前很少有研究从运输角度定量分析和比较增材制造工艺与传统工艺的环境绩效，但已经得出结论，减少运输产品的距离和数量，减少二氧化碳排放和能源消耗。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Systematic analysis of comparative studies between additive and conventional manufacturing focusing on the environmental performance of logistics operations

Abstract: Based on the promise to revolutionize the entire supply chain, additive manufacturing is seen as an alternative to conventional manufacturing processes, since it simplifies the production of small batches, shortens the distances between production and consumption and generates new distribution models. Due to its huge potential to spread more sustainable environmental practices, investigations on the environmental assumptions, concerning the application of additive manufacturing technologies, are required. Therefore, based on a systematic literature review, this study aimed to analyze the studies that addressed the environmental performance of logistics operations in a comparison among conventional and additive manufacturing, using the Life Cycle Assessment technic (LCA). Although there are few available studies that quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental performance of the additive manufacturing process with traditional process from a transport perspective, it has been concluded that reducing the distances and the quantity of transported products, carbon dioxide emissions and the consumption of energy resources are reduced.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Gestao e Producao Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

44 weeks

期刊介绍： Gestão & Produção is a journal published four times a year year (March, June, September and December) by the Departamento de Engenharia de Produção (DEP) of Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar). The first issue of Gestão & Produção was published in April, 1994. Actually, G&P was result of experience of professors of DEP/UFSCar in editing, in the beginning, "Cadernos DEP" in the 1980s, followed by "Cadernos de Engenharia de Produção". The last three issues of "Cadernos de Engenharia de Produção" were a test previous to the launch of Gestão & Produção because most of the journal characteristics were already established, like regularity.