科学动机问卷II (SMQ-II)对巴西葡语中学生的跨文化适应

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. B. Toma, Ayla Márcia Cordeiro Bizerra, Iraya Yánez, Jesús Ángel Meneses Villagrá
{"title":"科学动机问卷II (SMQ-II)对巴西葡语中学生的跨文化适应","authors":"R. B. Toma, Ayla Márcia Cordeiro Bizerra, Iraya Yánez, Jesús Ángel Meneses Villagrá","doi":"10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Science motivation is important for students’ scientific literacy. Yet, there is a lack of valid and reliable measurement tools for the Brazilian context. This study presents the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ-II) and motivational baseline data. Method: The instrument was translated into Brazilian Portuguese using cross-cultural validation procedures. For structural validity evidence, the responses of 646 secondary school students were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, as well as measurement invariance. For reliability evidence, Cronbach’s alpha (α) and McDonald’s omega (ω) were calculated. Students’ motivation was analysed using 2 (gender) x 4 (grade levels) x 3 (study modality) MANOVA. Results: 24 items measuring intrinsic motivation, career motivation, grade motivation, and self-efficacy supported a four-factor structure with adequate reliability against the original five-factor structure (self-determination was not salient). Measurement invariance was established across the gender and study modalities, but not for grade levels. Higher-grade level Brazilian students were less motivated, and girls reported higher intrinsic and career motivation, but lower self-efficacy than boys. Conclusion: These findings lay the foundation for the assessment of Brazilian students’ science motivation, although they also reveal problems in the latent structure of the SMQ-II and call for the development of instruments rooted in contemporary motivational theories.","PeriodicalId":46559,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural adaptation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II (SMQ-II) for Portuguesespeaking Brazilian secondary school students\",\"authors\":\"R. B. Toma, Ayla Márcia Cordeiro Bizerra, Iraya Yánez, Jesús Ángel Meneses Villagrá\",\"doi\":\"10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Science motivation is important for students’ scientific literacy. Yet, there is a lack of valid and reliable measurement tools for the Brazilian context. This study presents the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ-II) and motivational baseline data. Method: The instrument was translated into Brazilian Portuguese using cross-cultural validation procedures. For structural validity evidence, the responses of 646 secondary school students were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, as well as measurement invariance. For reliability evidence, Cronbach’s alpha (α) and McDonald’s omega (ω) were calculated. Students’ motivation was analysed using 2 (gender) x 4 (grade levels) x 3 (study modality) MANOVA. Results: 24 items measuring intrinsic motivation, career motivation, grade motivation, and self-efficacy supported a four-factor structure with adequate reliability against the original five-factor structure (self-determination was not salient). Measurement invariance was established across the gender and study modalities, but not for grade levels. Higher-grade level Brazilian students were less motivated, and girls reported higher intrinsic and career motivation, but lower self-efficacy than boys. Conclusion: These findings lay the foundation for the assessment of Brazilian students’ science motivation, although they also reveal problems in the latent structure of the SMQ-II and call for the development of instruments rooted in contemporary motivational theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.13\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:科学动机对学生科学素养的培养至关重要。然而,缺乏针对巴西情况的有效和可靠的测量工具。本研究提出了巴西葡萄牙语版科学动机问卷(SMQ-II)和动机基线数据。方法:采用跨文化验证程序将仪器翻译成巴西葡萄牙语。对于结构效度证据,我们对646名中学生的反应进行了探索性和验证性因子分析,并进行了测量不变性。信度证据采用Cronbach’s alpha (α)和McDonald’s omega (ω)进行计算。使用2(性别)x 4(年级水平)x 3(学习方式)方差分析分析学生的动机。结果:测量内在动机、职业动机、年级动机和自我效能感的24个项目支持四因素结构,相对于原五因素结构具有足够的信度(自我决定不显著)。在性别和研究模式之间建立了测量不变性,但在年级水平上没有。高年级的巴西学生动机较低,女生的内在动机和职业动机较高,但自我效能感低于男生。结论:这些发现为巴西学生科学动机的评估奠定了基础,尽管它们也揭示了SMQ-II潜在结构中的问题,并呼吁开发基于当代动机理论的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II (SMQ-II) for Portuguesespeaking Brazilian secondary school students
Introduction: Science motivation is important for students’ scientific literacy. Yet, there is a lack of valid and reliable measurement tools for the Brazilian context. This study presents the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ-II) and motivational baseline data. Method: The instrument was translated into Brazilian Portuguese using cross-cultural validation procedures. For structural validity evidence, the responses of 646 secondary school students were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, as well as measurement invariance. For reliability evidence, Cronbach’s alpha (α) and McDonald’s omega (ω) were calculated. Students’ motivation was analysed using 2 (gender) x 4 (grade levels) x 3 (study modality) MANOVA. Results: 24 items measuring intrinsic motivation, career motivation, grade motivation, and self-efficacy supported a four-factor structure with adequate reliability against the original five-factor structure (self-determination was not salient). Measurement invariance was established across the gender and study modalities, but not for grade levels. Higher-grade level Brazilian students were less motivated, and girls reported higher intrinsic and career motivation, but lower self-efficacy than boys. Conclusion: These findings lay the foundation for the assessment of Brazilian students’ science motivation, although they also reveal problems in the latent structure of the SMQ-II and call for the development of instruments rooted in contemporary motivational theories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Revista latinoamericana de Psicología (RLP) is a four month publication from Konrad Lorenz Fundación Universitaria. The RLP evaluates works that belong to one of the following categories: original papers (with empiric and new information) of many psychology fields (regardless of the methodology used) or qualitative/quantitative systematic reviews. Eventually it will be interested on works’ revision related to the development psychology tools or softwares, original methodology papers and researches which evaluate psychology from scientometry. The RLP is not interested in publishing non-systematic reviews or states of the art, case studies, protocols studies, hypothesis or papers proposals, letters, commentaries or essays, opinions articles, politics documents nor other sort of secondary literature. Traditionally, there have been monographics, books’ reviews and “others” published in “Mundo de la Psicología”, nevertheless these modalities will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信