明清在日本的研究:1984

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
I. Takao, J. Fogel
{"title":"明清在日本的研究:1984","authors":"I. Takao, J. Fogel","doi":"10.1353/late.1987.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until recently studies in Ming and Ch'ing history have been concerned with trying to elucidate social and economic processes of development in land relations. This has led to a thinning in the ranks of scholars in fields other than social and economic history, and to an ossification of other research topics. In the field of Ch'ing history, the Ch'ing dynasty has generally been seen both as an alien conquest dynasty and as the last native \"Chinese-style\" autocratic dynasty in an agricultural society. The Ch'ing did have this dual quality, but few have examined the issue comprehensively. It would be no exaggeration to say that the two sides have been severed and researched separately. The tendency to treat the period before the Manchus entered China separately from the period after, and the fact that few scholars have examined the eight gusa (banners) system of banner lands and imperial villas in social and economic historical research, provide but one reflection of this problem. In reviewing the over 120 books and articles concerning last year's research, I see no radical change in this situation. Yet, in looking for new points of view and issues, we should pay particular attention to the publication of several symposia. I begin with these.","PeriodicalId":43948,"journal":{"name":"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA","volume":"8 1","pages":"167 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/late.1987.0004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ming-Ch'ing Studies in Japan: 1984\",\"authors\":\"I. Takao, J. Fogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/late.1987.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Until recently studies in Ming and Ch'ing history have been concerned with trying to elucidate social and economic processes of development in land relations. This has led to a thinning in the ranks of scholars in fields other than social and economic history, and to an ossification of other research topics. In the field of Ch'ing history, the Ch'ing dynasty has generally been seen both as an alien conquest dynasty and as the last native \\\"Chinese-style\\\" autocratic dynasty in an agricultural society. The Ch'ing did have this dual quality, but few have examined the issue comprehensively. It would be no exaggeration to say that the two sides have been severed and researched separately. The tendency to treat the period before the Manchus entered China separately from the period after, and the fact that few scholars have examined the eight gusa (banners) system of banner lands and imperial villas in social and economic historical research, provide but one reflection of this problem. In reviewing the over 120 books and articles concerning last year's research, I see no radical change in this situation. Yet, in looking for new points of view and issues, we should pay particular attention to the publication of several symposia. I begin with these.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/late.1987.0004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/late.1987.0004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/late.1987.0004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

直到最近,明清历史研究一直致力于阐明土地关系中社会和经济发展的过程。这导致了社会和经济史以外领域的学者数量减少,以及其他研究课题的僵化。在清史领域,清朝通常被视为一个外来征服王朝,也是农业社会中最后一个本土的“中国式”专制王朝。《清》确实具有这种双重性质,但很少有人全面考察这个问题。可以毫不夸张地说,这两个方面是分开研究的。将满族人进入中国前与进入中国后分开对待的倾向,以及很少有学者在社会经济历史研究中考察旗地和皇家别墅的八旗制度,都只是这一问题的一个反映。在回顾了与去年的研究相关的120多本书籍和文章后,我认为这种情况并没有发生根本性的变化。然而,在寻找新的观点和问题时,我们应该特别注意一些专题讨论会的出版。我从这些开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ming-Ch'ing Studies in Japan: 1984
Until recently studies in Ming and Ch'ing history have been concerned with trying to elucidate social and economic processes of development in land relations. This has led to a thinning in the ranks of scholars in fields other than social and economic history, and to an ossification of other research topics. In the field of Ch'ing history, the Ch'ing dynasty has generally been seen both as an alien conquest dynasty and as the last native "Chinese-style" autocratic dynasty in an agricultural society. The Ch'ing did have this dual quality, but few have examined the issue comprehensively. It would be no exaggeration to say that the two sides have been severed and researched separately. The tendency to treat the period before the Manchus entered China separately from the period after, and the fact that few scholars have examined the eight gusa (banners) system of banner lands and imperial villas in social and economic historical research, provide but one reflection of this problem. In reviewing the over 120 books and articles concerning last year's research, I see no radical change in this situation. Yet, in looking for new points of view and issues, we should pay particular attention to the publication of several symposia. I begin with these.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信