{"title":"电影与隐私权","authors":"Caetlin Benson-Allott","doi":"10.1525/fq.2022.75.4.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FQ columnist Caetlin Benson-Allott examines the role of cinematographer Hélène Louvert’s in crafting narratives that protect the cinematic subject’s right to privacy in two recent films by female directors: Never Rarely Sometimes Always (Eliza Hittman, 2020) and The Lost Daughter (Maggie Gyllenhaal, 2021). Noting that the history of cinema has privileged the camera’s voyeuristic violation of privacy, particular of women and other minorities, Benson-Allott explores how Louvert employs different cinematic codes and conventions to instead protect and respect her characters’ interiority. These gestures call into question the presupposed right of both mainstream and art cinema to look, and encourage scholars’ long overdue attention to the role of the cinematographer in creating cinematic meaning.","PeriodicalId":45540,"journal":{"name":"FILM QUARTERLY","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Film and the Right to Privacy\",\"authors\":\"Caetlin Benson-Allott\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/fq.2022.75.4.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"FQ columnist Caetlin Benson-Allott examines the role of cinematographer Hélène Louvert’s in crafting narratives that protect the cinematic subject’s right to privacy in two recent films by female directors: Never Rarely Sometimes Always (Eliza Hittman, 2020) and The Lost Daughter (Maggie Gyllenhaal, 2021). Noting that the history of cinema has privileged the camera’s voyeuristic violation of privacy, particular of women and other minorities, Benson-Allott explores how Louvert employs different cinematic codes and conventions to instead protect and respect her characters’ interiority. These gestures call into question the presupposed right of both mainstream and art cinema to look, and encourage scholars’ long overdue attention to the role of the cinematographer in creating cinematic meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FILM QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FILM QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2022.75.4.58\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2022.75.4.58","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
《FQ》专栏作家Caetlin Benson-Allott研究了电影摄影师h l Louvert在最近两部女性导演的电影中所扮演的角色:《从不罕见,有时总是》(伊丽莎·希特曼,2020年)和《失踪的女儿》(玛吉·吉伦哈尔,2021年)。本森-阿洛特注意到电影史赋予了摄影机偷窥隐私的特权,尤其是对女性和其他少数族裔的隐私,他探讨了卢维尔如何使用不同的电影规范和惯例来保护和尊重她的角色的内在性。这些姿态对主流电影和艺术电影的预设权利提出了质疑,并鼓励学者们关注电影摄影师在创造电影意义中的作用。
FQ columnist Caetlin Benson-Allott examines the role of cinematographer Hélène Louvert’s in crafting narratives that protect the cinematic subject’s right to privacy in two recent films by female directors: Never Rarely Sometimes Always (Eliza Hittman, 2020) and The Lost Daughter (Maggie Gyllenhaal, 2021). Noting that the history of cinema has privileged the camera’s voyeuristic violation of privacy, particular of women and other minorities, Benson-Allott explores how Louvert employs different cinematic codes and conventions to instead protect and respect her characters’ interiority. These gestures call into question the presupposed right of both mainstream and art cinema to look, and encourage scholars’ long overdue attention to the role of the cinematographer in creating cinematic meaning.
期刊介绍:
Film Quarterly has been publishing substantial, peer-reviewed writing on motion pictures since 1958, earning a reputation as the most authoritative academic film journal in the United States. Its wide array of topics, perspectives, and approaches appeals to film scholars and film buffs alike. If you love all types of movies and are eager to encounter new ways of thinking about them, then Film Quarterly is the journal for you! Scholarly analyses of international cinemas, current blockbusters and Hollywood classics, documentaries, animation, and independent, avant-garde, and experimental film and video fill the pages of the journal.