{"title":"减少地面除草剂使用前颗粒漂移的机会","authors":"N. Kannan, Christina Huggins","doi":"10.13031/aea.15307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights Drift data collected from herbicide applications for corn, soybean, and cotton, including three commercial producers. Drift volumes and drift distances were estimated and correlated to wind speed, boom length, spray height, tractor speed, and droplet size (DV50). Boom length and spray height appear to be the dominant parameters affecting drift volume and drift distance, respectively. The results show a three- to fourfold reduction in drift using a hooded sprayer or spraying in calm weather. Abstract. Although several best practices are available, there are still opportunities to mitigate off-target pesticide drift, protect nearby sensitive crops, and address health concerns for humans/animals. The purpose of the study is to identify opportunities to mitigate drift from ground-based preemergent herbicide applications. Seven herbicide applications were tested for corn, soybean and cotton, including three regional commercial producers. Drift data were collected using water sensitive cards. ImageJ was used to analyze the droplet spectrum. Drift volumes and drift distances were estimated for each experiment. Data collected on wind speed, boom length, spray height, tractor speed, droplet size (DV50), and chemical application rate were used as explanatory variables of drift volume and drift distance. Individual and multiple linear regressions (MLRs) were carried out between drift volume, drift distance, and the explanatory variables. Our results show a three- to fourfold reduction in drift using a hooded sprayer or spraying in calm weather. Boom length and spray height appear to be the dominant parameters affecting drift volume and drift distance, respectively. The MLR results suggest that we can estimate drift (a) volume reasonably using a combination of boom length, DV50, and tractor speed and (b) distance reliably using a combination of spray height, boom length, and DV50. Keywords: Drift distance, Droplet spectrum, Fence board, Herbicide drift, Hooded sprayer, Preemergent herbicide, Water sensitive card.","PeriodicalId":55501,"journal":{"name":"Applied Engineering in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities to Mitigate Particle Drift from Ground-Based Preemergent Herbicide Applications\",\"authors\":\"N. Kannan, Christina Huggins\",\"doi\":\"10.13031/aea.15307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Highlights Drift data collected from herbicide applications for corn, soybean, and cotton, including three commercial producers. Drift volumes and drift distances were estimated and correlated to wind speed, boom length, spray height, tractor speed, and droplet size (DV50). Boom length and spray height appear to be the dominant parameters affecting drift volume and drift distance, respectively. The results show a three- to fourfold reduction in drift using a hooded sprayer or spraying in calm weather. Abstract. Although several best practices are available, there are still opportunities to mitigate off-target pesticide drift, protect nearby sensitive crops, and address health concerns for humans/animals. The purpose of the study is to identify opportunities to mitigate drift from ground-based preemergent herbicide applications. Seven herbicide applications were tested for corn, soybean and cotton, including three regional commercial producers. Drift data were collected using water sensitive cards. ImageJ was used to analyze the droplet spectrum. Drift volumes and drift distances were estimated for each experiment. Data collected on wind speed, boom length, spray height, tractor speed, droplet size (DV50), and chemical application rate were used as explanatory variables of drift volume and drift distance. Individual and multiple linear regressions (MLRs) were carried out between drift volume, drift distance, and the explanatory variables. Our results show a three- to fourfold reduction in drift using a hooded sprayer or spraying in calm weather. Boom length and spray height appear to be the dominant parameters affecting drift volume and drift distance, respectively. The MLR results suggest that we can estimate drift (a) volume reasonably using a combination of boom length, DV50, and tractor speed and (b) distance reliably using a combination of spray height, boom length, and DV50. Keywords: Drift distance, Droplet spectrum, Fence board, Herbicide drift, Hooded sprayer, Preemergent herbicide, Water sensitive card.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Engineering in Agriculture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Engineering in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.15307\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Engineering in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.15307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Opportunities to Mitigate Particle Drift from Ground-Based Preemergent Herbicide Applications
Highlights Drift data collected from herbicide applications for corn, soybean, and cotton, including three commercial producers. Drift volumes and drift distances were estimated and correlated to wind speed, boom length, spray height, tractor speed, and droplet size (DV50). Boom length and spray height appear to be the dominant parameters affecting drift volume and drift distance, respectively. The results show a three- to fourfold reduction in drift using a hooded sprayer or spraying in calm weather. Abstract. Although several best practices are available, there are still opportunities to mitigate off-target pesticide drift, protect nearby sensitive crops, and address health concerns for humans/animals. The purpose of the study is to identify opportunities to mitigate drift from ground-based preemergent herbicide applications. Seven herbicide applications were tested for corn, soybean and cotton, including three regional commercial producers. Drift data were collected using water sensitive cards. ImageJ was used to analyze the droplet spectrum. Drift volumes and drift distances were estimated for each experiment. Data collected on wind speed, boom length, spray height, tractor speed, droplet size (DV50), and chemical application rate were used as explanatory variables of drift volume and drift distance. Individual and multiple linear regressions (MLRs) were carried out between drift volume, drift distance, and the explanatory variables. Our results show a three- to fourfold reduction in drift using a hooded sprayer or spraying in calm weather. Boom length and spray height appear to be the dominant parameters affecting drift volume and drift distance, respectively. The MLR results suggest that we can estimate drift (a) volume reasonably using a combination of boom length, DV50, and tractor speed and (b) distance reliably using a combination of spray height, boom length, and DV50. Keywords: Drift distance, Droplet spectrum, Fence board, Herbicide drift, Hooded sprayer, Preemergent herbicide, Water sensitive card.
期刊介绍:
This peer-reviewed journal publishes applications of engineering and technology research that address agricultural, food, and biological systems problems. Submissions must include results of practical experiences, tests, or trials presented in a manner and style that will allow easy adaptation by others; results of reviews or studies of installations or applications with substantially new or significant information not readily available in other refereed publications; or a description of successful methods of techniques of education, outreach, or technology transfer.