保证的构成

Teise Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI:10.15388/teise.2022.123.5
Justinas Bagdžius
{"title":"保证的构成","authors":"Justinas Bagdžius","doi":"10.15388/teise.2022.123.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the legal institutionalization of surety as a social phenomenon as well as the reasons that led to its emergence and formation. The article tries to look at suretyship from a civil and criminal legal point of view in a comparative aspect, trying to form an unrefined concept of suretyship as an institute of criminal law.","PeriodicalId":33051,"journal":{"name":"Teise","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Composition of Surety\",\"authors\":\"Justinas Bagdžius\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/teise.2022.123.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the legal institutionalization of surety as a social phenomenon as well as the reasons that led to its emergence and formation. The article tries to look at suretyship from a civil and criminal legal point of view in a comparative aspect, trying to form an unrefined concept of suretyship as an institute of criminal law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teise\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2022.123.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2022.123.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了担保作为一种社会现象的法律制度化,以及导致其产生和形成的原因。本文试图从民法和刑法的角度对保证进行比较研究,试图形成一种不完善的保证概念作为一种刑法制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Composition of Surety
The article analyzes the legal institutionalization of surety as a social phenomenon as well as the reasons that led to its emergence and formation. The article tries to look at suretyship from a civil and criminal legal point of view in a comparative aspect, trying to form an unrefined concept of suretyship as an institute of criminal law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信