织网作为一种平等工作的策略

Cäcilia Innreiter-Moser, Claudia Schnugg
{"title":"织网作为一种平等工作的策略","authors":"Cäcilia Innreiter-Moser, Claudia Schnugg","doi":"10.15203/MOMENTUMQUARTERLY.VOL1.NO3.P165-183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Networking is a crucial factor for success at work. As men and women have unequal access to professional networks and handle network contacts differently, the use of networks leads to inequality in men’s and women’s success at work. In this study we use qualitative interviews to understand where these differences come from and why those differences are still observable although many professional networks are nowadays open to women and many women networks have been founded during the last two decades. We can show a slow change in the women’s perception of networks and how they handle distinct kinds of contacts (strong and weak ties). Further, we analyze this phenomenon from a neo-institutional perspective to understand why it takes so long to establish networking as a tool of women for success at work and why new women networks are not as effective as traditional networks. Concluding, we use this neo-institutional perspective to make suggestions of how to overcome the current situation, ease networking for women and make networking for women more successful.","PeriodicalId":53284,"journal":{"name":"Momentum Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":"165-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Netzwerken als Strategie zur beruflichen Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern\",\"authors\":\"Cäcilia Innreiter-Moser, Claudia Schnugg\",\"doi\":\"10.15203/MOMENTUMQUARTERLY.VOL1.NO3.P165-183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Networking is a crucial factor for success at work. As men and women have unequal access to professional networks and handle network contacts differently, the use of networks leads to inequality in men’s and women’s success at work. In this study we use qualitative interviews to understand where these differences come from and why those differences are still observable although many professional networks are nowadays open to women and many women networks have been founded during the last two decades. We can show a slow change in the women’s perception of networks and how they handle distinct kinds of contacts (strong and weak ties). Further, we analyze this phenomenon from a neo-institutional perspective to understand why it takes so long to establish networking as a tool of women for success at work and why new women networks are not as effective as traditional networks. Concluding, we use this neo-institutional perspective to make suggestions of how to overcome the current situation, ease networking for women and make networking for women more successful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Momentum Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"165-183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Momentum Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15203/MOMENTUMQUARTERLY.VOL1.NO3.P165-183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Momentum Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15203/MOMENTUMQUARTERLY.VOL1.NO3.P165-183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人脉是工作成功的关键因素。由于男性和女性进入职业网络的机会不平等,处理网络联系的方式也不同,因此网络的使用导致了男性和女性在工作上取得成功的不平等。在这项研究中,我们使用定性访谈来了解这些差异来自哪里,以及为什么这些差异仍然可以观察到,尽管许多专业网络现在对女性开放,许多女性网络在过去二十年中成立。我们可以看到,女性对人际网络的看法以及她们如何处理不同类型的联系(强关系和弱关系)发生了缓慢的变化。此外,我们从新制度的角度分析了这一现象,以理解为什么建立网络作为女性在工作中取得成功的工具需要这么长时间,以及为什么新的女性网络不如传统网络有效。最后,我们用这种新制度的观点来提出如何克服当前的情况,简化女性的网络,使女性的网络更成功的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Netzwerken als Strategie zur beruflichen Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern
Networking is a crucial factor for success at work. As men and women have unequal access to professional networks and handle network contacts differently, the use of networks leads to inequality in men’s and women’s success at work. In this study we use qualitative interviews to understand where these differences come from and why those differences are still observable although many professional networks are nowadays open to women and many women networks have been founded during the last two decades. We can show a slow change in the women’s perception of networks and how they handle distinct kinds of contacts (strong and weak ties). Further, we analyze this phenomenon from a neo-institutional perspective to understand why it takes so long to establish networking as a tool of women for success at work and why new women networks are not as effective as traditional networks. Concluding, we use this neo-institutional perspective to make suggestions of how to overcome the current situation, ease networking for women and make networking for women more successful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信