互联网财务报告:菲律宾银行案例

Jesus P. Briones, Doringer P. Cabrera
{"title":"互联网财务报告:菲律宾银行案例","authors":"Jesus P. Briones, Doringer P. Cabrera","doi":"10.14710/JAA.13.1.1-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to evaluate the extent of internet financial reporting (IFR) of Philippine banks.  Used as samples were top commercial banks and thrift banks operating in the country considering their total assets as of March,                                                                                                                                                                                      2012 as published by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas in its website. Financial information in the websites of the sampled banks were evaluated during the third quarter of 2012.  The study revealed that the quality and extent of IFR of Philippine commercial banks is “average” based on their IFR index score of 44.50 while thrift banks posted a below average IFR index score of 21.56 resulting to a highly significant difference between bank types. Among the four evaluation criteria used, the subject-banks’ content disclosure provides the highest percentage contribution to their IFR index scores as this is the main focus of their financial reporting. Among the components of content disclosure, corporate information, chairman’s report and the auditor’s report emerged as the top three often included in the financial disclosure of the subject-banks while vision statement and press release are the components often updated by both bank types in their websites with the commercial banks notably updating more frequently compared to thrift banks.   Relative to technology, online feedback is the most common component in the banks’ website while link to homepage is the most usual user support feature relative to the bank’s financial reporting practice. Lastly, asset size and bank type were found to have a high significant relationship with the extent of IFR.","PeriodicalId":32428,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTERNET FINANCIAL REPORTING: THE CASE OF PHILIPPINE BANKS\",\"authors\":\"Jesus P. Briones, Doringer P. Cabrera\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/JAA.13.1.1-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research is to evaluate the extent of internet financial reporting (IFR) of Philippine banks.  Used as samples were top commercial banks and thrift banks operating in the country considering their total assets as of March,                                                                                                                                                                                      2012 as published by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas in its website. Financial information in the websites of the sampled banks were evaluated during the third quarter of 2012.  The study revealed that the quality and extent of IFR of Philippine commercial banks is “average” based on their IFR index score of 44.50 while thrift banks posted a below average IFR index score of 21.56 resulting to a highly significant difference between bank types. Among the four evaluation criteria used, the subject-banks’ content disclosure provides the highest percentage contribution to their IFR index scores as this is the main focus of their financial reporting. Among the components of content disclosure, corporate information, chairman’s report and the auditor’s report emerged as the top three often included in the financial disclosure of the subject-banks while vision statement and press release are the components often updated by both bank types in their websites with the commercial banks notably updating more frequently compared to thrift banks.   Relative to technology, online feedback is the most common component in the banks’ website while link to homepage is the most usual user support feature relative to the bank’s financial reporting practice. Lastly, asset size and bank type were found to have a high significant relationship with the extent of IFR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/JAA.13.1.1-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/JAA.13.1.1-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是评估菲律宾银行的互联网财务报告(IFR)的程度。作为样本商业银行和储蓄银行在考虑他们的总资产截至3月 ,                                                                                                                                                                                       2012年,菲律宾央行在其网站上公布的。抽样银行网站上的财务信息在2012年第三季度进行了评估。研究显示,菲律宾商业银行IFR的质量和程度为“平均”,其IFR指数得分为44.50,而储蓄银行的IFR指数得分为21.56,低于平均水平,导致银行类型之间的差异非常显著。在使用的四个评估标准中,主题银行的内容披露对其IFR指数得分的贡献百分比最高,因为这是其财务报告的主要焦点。在内容披露的组成部分中,公司信息、董事长报告和审计报告是主体银行财务披露的前三位,而愿景声明和新闻稿是两类银行在其网站上经常更新的组成部分,其中商业银行的更新频率明显高于储蓄银行。相对于技术而言,在线反馈是银行网站上最常见的组成部分,而主页链接是相对于银行财务报告实践最常见的用户支持功能。最后,发现资产规模和银行类型与IFR的程度有高度显著的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INTERNET FINANCIAL REPORTING: THE CASE OF PHILIPPINE BANKS
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the extent of internet financial reporting (IFR) of Philippine banks.  Used as samples were top commercial banks and thrift banks operating in the country considering their total assets as of March,                                                                                                                                                                                      2012 as published by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas in its website. Financial information in the websites of the sampled banks were evaluated during the third quarter of 2012.  The study revealed that the quality and extent of IFR of Philippine commercial banks is “average” based on their IFR index score of 44.50 while thrift banks posted a below average IFR index score of 21.56 resulting to a highly significant difference between bank types. Among the four evaluation criteria used, the subject-banks’ content disclosure provides the highest percentage contribution to their IFR index scores as this is the main focus of their financial reporting. Among the components of content disclosure, corporate information, chairman’s report and the auditor’s report emerged as the top three often included in the financial disclosure of the subject-banks while vision statement and press release are the components often updated by both bank types in their websites with the commercial banks notably updating more frequently compared to thrift banks.   Relative to technology, online feedback is the most common component in the banks’ website while link to homepage is the most usual user support feature relative to the bank’s financial reporting practice. Lastly, asset size and bank type were found to have a high significant relationship with the extent of IFR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信