粘性土中插入桩和打入桩轴向承载力预测方法的评价

IF 1 4区工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL

Gradevinar Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.14256/jce.2175.2017

N. Obradović

{"title":"粘性土中插入桩和打入桩轴向承载力预测方法的评价","authors":"N. Obradović","doi":"10.14256/jce.2175.2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the evaluation of methods for predicting the ultimate axial bearing capacity of single piles based on the cone penetration test (CPT) results, and the evaluation of static methods based on the effective and total stress analysis. Seventeen jacked-in MEGA piles and eight Franki piles of different lengths are considered. The results show that the Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC) method is the most appropriate for the studied geotechnical conditions and pile types.","PeriodicalId":50415,"journal":{"name":"Gradevinar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils\",\"authors\":\"N. Obradović\",\"doi\":\"10.14256/jce.2175.2017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the evaluation of methods for predicting the ultimate axial bearing capacity of single piles based on the cone penetration test (CPT) results, and the evaluation of static methods based on the effective and total stress analysis. Seventeen jacked-in MEGA piles and eight Franki piles of different lengths are considered. The results show that the Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC) method is the most appropriate for the studied geotechnical conditions and pile types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gradevinar\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gradevinar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14256/jce.2175.2017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gradevinar","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14256/jce.2175.2017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文介绍了基于锥贯试验结果的单桩极限轴向承载力预测方法的评价，以及基于有效应力和总应力分析的静力法的评价。考虑了17个不同长度的MEGA桩和8个不同长度的Franki桩。结果表明，Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC)方法最适合所研究的岩土条件和桩型。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils

This paper presents the evaluation of methods for predicting the ultimate axial bearing capacity of single piles based on the cone penetration test (CPT) results, and the evaluation of static methods based on the effective and total stress analysis. Seventeen jacked-in MEGA piles and eight Franki piles of different lengths are considered. The results show that the Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC) method is the most appropriate for the studied geotechnical conditions and pile types.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Gradevinar ENGINEERING, CIVIL-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

18.20%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Information not localized