航空观测对北极海冰季节性厚度分布的热力和动力贡献

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Luisa von Albedyll, S. Hendricks, Raphael Grodofzig, T. Krumpen, Stefanie Arndt, H. J. Belter, G. Birnbaum, B. Cheng, M. Hoppmann, J. Hutchings, P. Itkin, R. Lei, M. Nicolaus, R. Ricker, J. Rohde, Mira Suhrhoff, A. Timofeeva, D. Watkins, M. Webster, C. Haas
{"title":"航空观测对北极海冰季节性厚度分布的热力和动力贡献","authors":"Luisa von Albedyll, S. Hendricks, Raphael Grodofzig, T. Krumpen, Stefanie Arndt, H. J. Belter, G. Birnbaum, B. Cheng, M. Hoppmann, J. Hutchings, P. Itkin, R. Lei, M. Nicolaus, R. Ricker, J. Rohde, Mira Suhrhoff, A. Timofeeva, D. Watkins, M. Webster, C. Haas","doi":"10.1525/elementa.2021.00074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sea ice thickness is a key parameter in the polar climate and ecosystem. Thermodynamic and dynamic processes alter the sea ice thickness. The Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition provided a unique opportunity to study seasonal sea ice thickness changes of the same sea ice. We analyzed 11 large-scale (∼50 km) airborne electromagnetic sea thickness and surface roughness surveys from October 2019 to September 2020. Data from ice mass balance and position buoys provided additional information. We found that thermodynamic growth and decay dominated the seasonal cycle with a total mean sea ice thickness increase of 1.4 m (October 2019 to June 2020) and decay of 1.2 m (June 2020 to September 2020). Ice dynamics and deformation-related processes, such as thin ice formation in leads and subsequent ridging, broadened the ice thickness distribution and contributed 30% to the increase in mean thickness. These processes caused a 1-month delay between maximum thermodynamic sea ice thickness and maximum mean ice thickness. The airborne EM measurements bridged the scales from local floe-scale measurements to Arctic-wide satellite observations and model grid cells. The spatial differences in mean sea ice thickness between the Central Observatory (<10 km) of MOSAiC and the Distributed Network (<50 km) were negligible in fall and only 0.2 m in late winter, but the relative abundance of thin and thick ice varied. One unexpected outcome was the large dynamic thickening in a regime where divergence prevailed on average in the western Nansen Basin in spring. We suggest that the large dynamic thickening was due to the mobile, unconsolidated sea ice pack and periodic, sub-daily motion. We demonstrate that this Lagrangian sea ice thickness data set is well suited for validating the existing redistribution theory in sea ice models. Our comprehensive description of seasonal changes of the sea ice thickness distribution is valuable for interpreting MOSAiC time series across disciplines and can be used as a reference to advance sea ice thickness modeling.","PeriodicalId":54279,"journal":{"name":"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermodynamic and dynamic contributions to seasonal Arctic sea ice thickness distributions from airborne observations\",\"authors\":\"Luisa von Albedyll, S. Hendricks, Raphael Grodofzig, T. Krumpen, Stefanie Arndt, H. J. Belter, G. Birnbaum, B. Cheng, M. Hoppmann, J. Hutchings, P. Itkin, R. Lei, M. Nicolaus, R. Ricker, J. Rohde, Mira Suhrhoff, A. Timofeeva, D. Watkins, M. Webster, C. Haas\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/elementa.2021.00074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sea ice thickness is a key parameter in the polar climate and ecosystem. Thermodynamic and dynamic processes alter the sea ice thickness. The Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition provided a unique opportunity to study seasonal sea ice thickness changes of the same sea ice. We analyzed 11 large-scale (∼50 km) airborne electromagnetic sea thickness and surface roughness surveys from October 2019 to September 2020. Data from ice mass balance and position buoys provided additional information. We found that thermodynamic growth and decay dominated the seasonal cycle with a total mean sea ice thickness increase of 1.4 m (October 2019 to June 2020) and decay of 1.2 m (June 2020 to September 2020). Ice dynamics and deformation-related processes, such as thin ice formation in leads and subsequent ridging, broadened the ice thickness distribution and contributed 30% to the increase in mean thickness. These processes caused a 1-month delay between maximum thermodynamic sea ice thickness and maximum mean ice thickness. The airborne EM measurements bridged the scales from local floe-scale measurements to Arctic-wide satellite observations and model grid cells. The spatial differences in mean sea ice thickness between the Central Observatory (<10 km) of MOSAiC and the Distributed Network (<50 km) were negligible in fall and only 0.2 m in late winter, but the relative abundance of thin and thick ice varied. One unexpected outcome was the large dynamic thickening in a regime where divergence prevailed on average in the western Nansen Basin in spring. We suggest that the large dynamic thickening was due to the mobile, unconsolidated sea ice pack and periodic, sub-daily motion. We demonstrate that this Lagrangian sea ice thickness data set is well suited for validating the existing redistribution theory in sea ice models. Our comprehensive description of seasonal changes of the sea ice thickness distribution is valuable for interpreting MOSAiC time series across disciplines and can be used as a reference to advance sea ice thickness modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

海冰厚度是极地气候和生态系统的一个关键参数。热力和动力过程改变了海冰的厚度。北极气候研究多学科漂流观测站(MOSAiC)考察为研究同一海冰的季节性海冰厚度变化提供了独特的机会。我们分析了2019年10月至2020年9月期间11次大规模(~ 50公里)航空电磁海厚和表面粗糙度调查。来自冰质量平衡和位置浮标的数据提供了更多的信息。研究发现,热力增长和衰减主导了季节周期,总平均海冰厚度增加1.4 m(2019年10月至2020年6月),衰减1.2 m(2020年6月至2020年9月)。冰的动力和变形相关过程,如铅段的薄冰形成和随后的脊状隆起,扩大了冰的厚度分布,对平均厚度的增加贡献了30%。这些过程造成最大热力海冰厚度与最大平均海冰厚度之间的1个月延迟。机载电磁测量将局部浮冰尺度测量与北极范围的卫星观测和模型网格单元连接起来。MOSAiC中心观测站(<10 km)和分布式观测站(<50 km)的平均海冰厚度在秋季的空间差异可以忽略不计,在冬末仅为0.2 m,但薄冰和厚冰的相对丰度存在差异。一个意想不到的结果是在南森盆地西部春季平均辐散盛行的状态下出现了大的动力增厚。我们认为,大的动力增厚是由于移动的、未固结的海冰和周期性的亚日运动。我们证明了拉格朗日海冰厚度数据集非常适合验证现有海冰模型中的再分布理论。我们对海冰厚度分布的季节变化的全面描述,对于解释MOSAiC时间序列具有跨学科的价值,并可作为推进海冰厚度建模的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermodynamic and dynamic contributions to seasonal Arctic sea ice thickness distributions from airborne observations
Sea ice thickness is a key parameter in the polar climate and ecosystem. Thermodynamic and dynamic processes alter the sea ice thickness. The Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition provided a unique opportunity to study seasonal sea ice thickness changes of the same sea ice. We analyzed 11 large-scale (∼50 km) airborne electromagnetic sea thickness and surface roughness surveys from October 2019 to September 2020. Data from ice mass balance and position buoys provided additional information. We found that thermodynamic growth and decay dominated the seasonal cycle with a total mean sea ice thickness increase of 1.4 m (October 2019 to June 2020) and decay of 1.2 m (June 2020 to September 2020). Ice dynamics and deformation-related processes, such as thin ice formation in leads and subsequent ridging, broadened the ice thickness distribution and contributed 30% to the increase in mean thickness. These processes caused a 1-month delay between maximum thermodynamic sea ice thickness and maximum mean ice thickness. The airborne EM measurements bridged the scales from local floe-scale measurements to Arctic-wide satellite observations and model grid cells. The spatial differences in mean sea ice thickness between the Central Observatory (<10 km) of MOSAiC and the Distributed Network (<50 km) were negligible in fall and only 0.2 m in late winter, but the relative abundance of thin and thick ice varied. One unexpected outcome was the large dynamic thickening in a regime where divergence prevailed on average in the western Nansen Basin in spring. We suggest that the large dynamic thickening was due to the mobile, unconsolidated sea ice pack and periodic, sub-daily motion. We demonstrate that this Lagrangian sea ice thickness data set is well suited for validating the existing redistribution theory in sea ice models. Our comprehensive description of seasonal changes of the sea ice thickness distribution is valuable for interpreting MOSAiC time series across disciplines and can be used as a reference to advance sea ice thickness modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene
Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A new open-access scientific journal, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene publishes original research reporting on new knowledge of the Earth’s physical, chemical, and biological systems; interactions between human and natural systems; and steps that can be taken to mitigate and adapt to global change. Elementa reports on fundamental advancements in research organized initially into six knowledge domains, embracing the concept that basic knowledge can foster sustainable solutions for society. Elementa is published on an open-access, public-good basis—available freely and immediately to the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信