吡虫啉、啶虫啉和灭多威在甘薯叶中的残留

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
A. J. Al-Rajab, A. Alhababy, T. Alfaifi
{"title":"吡虫啉、啶虫啉和灭多威在甘薯叶中的残留","authors":"A. J. Al-Rajab, A. Alhababy, T. Alfaifi","doi":"10.1515/hppj-2016-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Qat leaves are chewed on a daily basis by approximately 10 million inhabitants of different countries. This study investigated the persistence of three insecticides most used in qat production, imidacloprid, acetamiprid and methomyl. These chemicals were applied separately on plots of ten qat trees each at the recommended application rates. Samples of qat leaves were collected separately at time 0 (1 h post-treatment) and 1, 3, 7, 12, 19, 26 and 37 days after application. The residues of the investigated pesticides were extracted and then quantified by liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS). The half-lives of imidacloprid, acetamiprid and methomyl were 12.2, 11.7, and 5.1 days, respectively. Overall, our findings showed that imidacloprid and acetamiprid were more persistent than methomyl in qat leaves. Taking into account the maximum residue limits (MRL) in lettuce, due to lack of MRL in qat leaves, the residue concentrations were below MRL for imidacloprid 7 days after application, and 1 day after application for acetamiprid and methomyl.","PeriodicalId":39459,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Plant Protection Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"51 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/hppj-2016-0006","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistence of imidacloprid, acetamiprid and methomyl in qat leaves\",\"authors\":\"A. J. Al-Rajab, A. Alhababy, T. Alfaifi\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/hppj-2016-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Qat leaves are chewed on a daily basis by approximately 10 million inhabitants of different countries. This study investigated the persistence of three insecticides most used in qat production, imidacloprid, acetamiprid and methomyl. These chemicals were applied separately on plots of ten qat trees each at the recommended application rates. Samples of qat leaves were collected separately at time 0 (1 h post-treatment) and 1, 3, 7, 12, 19, 26 and 37 days after application. The residues of the investigated pesticides were extracted and then quantified by liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS). The half-lives of imidacloprid, acetamiprid and methomyl were 12.2, 11.7, and 5.1 days, respectively. Overall, our findings showed that imidacloprid and acetamiprid were more persistent than methomyl in qat leaves. Taking into account the maximum residue limits (MRL) in lettuce, due to lack of MRL in qat leaves, the residue concentrations were below MRL for imidacloprid 7 days after application, and 1 day after application for acetamiprid and methomyl.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Plant Protection Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/hppj-2016-0006\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Plant Protection Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/hppj-2016-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Plant Protection Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/hppj-2016-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

来自不同国家的大约1000万居民每天都在咀嚼卡塔尔叶。本研究调查了甘薯生产中最常用的三种杀虫剂吡虫啉、啶虫脒和灭多威的持久性。这些化学物质按推荐的施用量分别施用于10棵卡特树的地块上。分别于处理后0(处理后1 h)和处理后1、3、7、12、19、26、37 d采集叶片样品。提取农药残留,采用液相色谱(LC-MS/MS)定量分析。吡虫啉、啶虫脒和灭多威的半衰期分别为12.2、11.7和5.1 d。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,吡虫啉和啶虫啉在茶叶中的持久性比灭多威强。考虑到生菜的最大残留限量(MRL),由于卡特叶缺乏最大残留限量,吡虫啉在施用后7天的残留浓度低于MRL,对乙酰咪唑啉和灭多威在施用后1天的残留浓度低于MRL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Persistence of imidacloprid, acetamiprid and methomyl in qat leaves
Summary Qat leaves are chewed on a daily basis by approximately 10 million inhabitants of different countries. This study investigated the persistence of three insecticides most used in qat production, imidacloprid, acetamiprid and methomyl. These chemicals were applied separately on plots of ten qat trees each at the recommended application rates. Samples of qat leaves were collected separately at time 0 (1 h post-treatment) and 1, 3, 7, 12, 19, 26 and 37 days after application. The residues of the investigated pesticides were extracted and then quantified by liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS). The half-lives of imidacloprid, acetamiprid and methomyl were 12.2, 11.7, and 5.1 days, respectively. Overall, our findings showed that imidacloprid and acetamiprid were more persistent than methomyl in qat leaves. Taking into account the maximum residue limits (MRL) in lettuce, due to lack of MRL in qat leaves, the residue concentrations were below MRL for imidacloprid 7 days after application, and 1 day after application for acetamiprid and methomyl.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hellenic Plant Protection Journal
Hellenic Plant Protection Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信