沙特和埃及宗教

Vera Schiller
{"title":"沙特和埃及宗教","authors":"Vera Schiller","doi":"10.14232/belv.2020.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Souda encyclopaedia brought into being around 1000 A.D. is a product of Byzantine humanism. This epoch is proud of its knowledge of classical antiquity, it wants to harmonize it with its own knowledge, and not make it forgotten. It equally wants to look upon the notions of ancient Egyptian religion in a correct way, and give a correct idea of them. In the encyclopaedia three variants of forwarding the Egyptian substance of myths can be detected. The fi rst consists in regarding gods as former monarchs. It enlists the gods under the names of the Greek gods identifi ed with them, and considers them as early monarchs of Egypt. This does not cause any diffi culty as also Egyptian tradition is convinced of its fi rst monarchs being creative gods. This in itself is not a new discovery. Earlier World chronicles described the histories of ancient peoples in a similar way; moreover it is exactly the texts of the former that Souda includes in the encyclopaedia. – The second variant mentions Egyptian gods by their own names, and describes them as being of godly character. You cannot feel any aversion in the encyclopaedia, apart sometimes from the euhemistic view, according to which a god was, in reality, an ancient monarch in whose honour a temple was erected after his death. – The third group of knowledge must, however, be a product of the new way of thinking. The editors of Souda preserve the neo-Platonist philosophers of the 5th century by including Damascus’ work. These philosophers fi ght, by means of the saint synchretism, for the preservation of the ancient religion in Egypt. The considerate description of the philosophers defending pagan cults against Christianism allows the emotional atmosphere of the epoch to unfold. The editor/editors of the encyclopaedia does/do not want to keep secret or make disappear the substance of knowledge and the way of thinking of ancient epochs. They want to preserve them and to build them into the substance of present knowledge in a way similar to the one, by which they try to connect, with each other, the traditions of diff erent peoples.","PeriodicalId":30998,"journal":{"name":"Belvedere Meridionale","volume":"32 1","pages":"89-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Szuda és az egyiptomi vallás\",\"authors\":\"Vera Schiller\",\"doi\":\"10.14232/belv.2020.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Souda encyclopaedia brought into being around 1000 A.D. is a product of Byzantine humanism. This epoch is proud of its knowledge of classical antiquity, it wants to harmonize it with its own knowledge, and not make it forgotten. It equally wants to look upon the notions of ancient Egyptian religion in a correct way, and give a correct idea of them. In the encyclopaedia three variants of forwarding the Egyptian substance of myths can be detected. The fi rst consists in regarding gods as former monarchs. It enlists the gods under the names of the Greek gods identifi ed with them, and considers them as early monarchs of Egypt. This does not cause any diffi culty as also Egyptian tradition is convinced of its fi rst monarchs being creative gods. This in itself is not a new discovery. Earlier World chronicles described the histories of ancient peoples in a similar way; moreover it is exactly the texts of the former that Souda includes in the encyclopaedia. – The second variant mentions Egyptian gods by their own names, and describes them as being of godly character. You cannot feel any aversion in the encyclopaedia, apart sometimes from the euhemistic view, according to which a god was, in reality, an ancient monarch in whose honour a temple was erected after his death. – The third group of knowledge must, however, be a product of the new way of thinking. The editors of Souda preserve the neo-Platonist philosophers of the 5th century by including Damascus’ work. These philosophers fi ght, by means of the saint synchretism, for the preservation of the ancient religion in Egypt. The considerate description of the philosophers defending pagan cults against Christianism allows the emotional atmosphere of the epoch to unfold. The editor/editors of the encyclopaedia does/do not want to keep secret or make disappear the substance of knowledge and the way of thinking of ancient epochs. They want to preserve them and to build them into the substance of present knowledge in a way similar to the one, by which they try to connect, with each other, the traditions of diff erent peoples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belvedere Meridionale\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"89-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belvedere Meridionale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14232/belv.2020.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belvedere Meridionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/belv.2020.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公元1000年左右形成的苏达百科全书是拜占庭人文主义的产物。这个时代为它对古典古代的知识感到自豪,它想使它与自己的知识和谐一致,而不是使它被遗忘。它同样想以正确的方式看待古埃及的宗教观念,并给出一个正确的观念。在百科全书中,可以发现三种转发埃及神话实质的变体。第一个是把神视为以前的君主。它以与之认同的希腊诸神的名字列出了诸神,并认为他们是埃及早期的君主。这并没有造成任何困难,因为埃及的传统也相信它的第一个君主是创造性的神。这本身并不是一个新发现。早期的世界编年史以类似的方式描述了古代民族的历史;此外,苏达收录在百科全书中的正是前者的文本。第二种变体提到了埃及诸神自己的名字,并将他们描述为具有虔诚的品格。在《百科全书》中,除了一些委婉的观点外,你不会感到有什么厌恶之情,这些观点认为,神实际上是一位古代君主,在他死后,人们为他修建了一座神庙。然而,第三类知识必须是新思维方式的产物。《苏达》的编辑通过收录大马士革的著作,保留了5世纪的新柏拉图主义哲学家。这些哲学家们通过圣人同步主义为保存埃及的古代宗教而斗争。对哲学家捍卫异教邪教反对基督教的细致描述,使时代的情感氛围得以展开。百科全书的编者们并不想保守秘密,也不想让知识的实质和古代时代的思维方式消失。他们想要保存它们,并以一种类似于他们试图将不同民族的传统相互联系起来的方式,将它们构建成当前知识的实质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Szuda és az egyiptomi vallás
The Souda encyclopaedia brought into being around 1000 A.D. is a product of Byzantine humanism. This epoch is proud of its knowledge of classical antiquity, it wants to harmonize it with its own knowledge, and not make it forgotten. It equally wants to look upon the notions of ancient Egyptian religion in a correct way, and give a correct idea of them. In the encyclopaedia three variants of forwarding the Egyptian substance of myths can be detected. The fi rst consists in regarding gods as former monarchs. It enlists the gods under the names of the Greek gods identifi ed with them, and considers them as early monarchs of Egypt. This does not cause any diffi culty as also Egyptian tradition is convinced of its fi rst monarchs being creative gods. This in itself is not a new discovery. Earlier World chronicles described the histories of ancient peoples in a similar way; moreover it is exactly the texts of the former that Souda includes in the encyclopaedia. – The second variant mentions Egyptian gods by their own names, and describes them as being of godly character. You cannot feel any aversion in the encyclopaedia, apart sometimes from the euhemistic view, according to which a god was, in reality, an ancient monarch in whose honour a temple was erected after his death. – The third group of knowledge must, however, be a product of the new way of thinking. The editors of Souda preserve the neo-Platonist philosophers of the 5th century by including Damascus’ work. These philosophers fi ght, by means of the saint synchretism, for the preservation of the ancient religion in Egypt. The considerate description of the philosophers defending pagan cults against Christianism allows the emotional atmosphere of the epoch to unfold. The editor/editors of the encyclopaedia does/do not want to keep secret or make disappear the substance of knowledge and the way of thinking of ancient epochs. They want to preserve them and to build them into the substance of present knowledge in a way similar to the one, by which they try to connect, with each other, the traditions of diff erent peoples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信