独立文化生产领域的合法化策略:以美国重新发行唱片公司为例

Q3 Social Sciences
Andrew Bowsher
{"title":"独立文化生产领域的合法化策略:以美国重新发行唱片公司为例","authors":"Andrew Bowsher","doi":"10.1515/irsr-2015-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the cultural practice of effecting an independent marketplace for reissued music in the United States, based on ethnographic fieldwork in Austin, Texas with independent record labels and consumers. As the music industry is not a homogenous entity (Williamson and Cloonan, 2007), I argue that the practice of legitimising an independent marketplace requires the formulation of a ‘mainstream’ market to which the independent is opposed, and the erecting of marketplace myths (Arsel and Thompson, 2010) to substantiate the independent marketplace’s claims to differ from the mainstream. Legitimising strategies (Strachan, 2007) protect the investments made by producers and consumers of goods in their marketplace. To overcome the anxiety that commodified culture is inauthentic culture, the independent marketplace for reissued music is idealised as a realm of soft capitalism that enables the commodification of cultural goods without the stigmatisation of profiteering, exploitation and ‘inorganic’ music associated with the mainstream (Negus, 1992).","PeriodicalId":37251,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"102 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/irsr-2015-0009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legitimising Strategies in the Field of Independent Cultural Production: the Case of Reissue Record Labels in the USA\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Bowsher\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/irsr-2015-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article examines the cultural practice of effecting an independent marketplace for reissued music in the United States, based on ethnographic fieldwork in Austin, Texas with independent record labels and consumers. As the music industry is not a homogenous entity (Williamson and Cloonan, 2007), I argue that the practice of legitimising an independent marketplace requires the formulation of a ‘mainstream’ market to which the independent is opposed, and the erecting of marketplace myths (Arsel and Thompson, 2010) to substantiate the independent marketplace’s claims to differ from the mainstream. Legitimising strategies (Strachan, 2007) protect the investments made by producers and consumers of goods in their marketplace. To overcome the anxiety that commodified culture is inauthentic culture, the independent marketplace for reissued music is idealised as a realm of soft capitalism that enables the commodification of cultural goods without the stigmatisation of profiteering, exploitation and ‘inorganic’ music associated with the mainstream (Negus, 1992).\",\"PeriodicalId\":37251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Social Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/irsr-2015-0009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Social Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于对独立唱片公司和消费者在德克萨斯州奥斯汀进行的人种学田野调查,研究了影响美国重新发行音乐独立市场的文化实践。由于音乐产业不是一个同质的实体(Williamson和Cloonan, 2007),我认为使独立市场合法化的做法需要制定一个独立市场反对的“主流”市场,并建立市场神话(Arsel和Thompson, 2010)来证实独立市场与主流不同的主张。合法化策略(Strachan, 2007)保护生产者和消费者在其市场上的商品的投资。为了克服商品化文化是不真实文化的焦虑,重新发行音乐的独立市场被理想化为软资本主义的领域,它使文化商品商品化,而不会受到与主流相关的暴利、剥削和“无机”音乐的污名(Negus, 1992)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legitimising Strategies in the Field of Independent Cultural Production: the Case of Reissue Record Labels in the USA
Abstract This article examines the cultural practice of effecting an independent marketplace for reissued music in the United States, based on ethnographic fieldwork in Austin, Texas with independent record labels and consumers. As the music industry is not a homogenous entity (Williamson and Cloonan, 2007), I argue that the practice of legitimising an independent marketplace requires the formulation of a ‘mainstream’ market to which the independent is opposed, and the erecting of marketplace myths (Arsel and Thompson, 2010) to substantiate the independent marketplace’s claims to differ from the mainstream. Legitimising strategies (Strachan, 2007) protect the investments made by producers and consumers of goods in their marketplace. To overcome the anxiety that commodified culture is inauthentic culture, the independent marketplace for reissued music is idealised as a realm of soft capitalism that enables the commodification of cultural goods without the stigmatisation of profiteering, exploitation and ‘inorganic’ music associated with the mainstream (Negus, 1992).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Social Research
International Review of Social Research Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信