{"title":"论文谈话:1960年前加拿大图书馆、印刷文化和原住民的历史(回顾)","authors":"S. Nash","doi":"10.1353/LAC.2006.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"He asserts that many libraries simply did not advertise their abilities to supply election information to the public; they also failed to collect viewpoints on all major issues that would have helped “correct the misinformation that was everywhere during the campaign” (14). Berry later specifi es how libraries can and should repair this apathy. McCook also delves into this theme of democracy and bridges her personal journey as a librarian in the turbulent 1960s with that of today. She writes of the continuing importance for libraries to advocate social justice: challenge library closings and censorship, support workers’ rights, and secure “preferential treatment to poor people and the homeless” (97). Few essays in this collection deal solely with library education, but many do include brief mentions. The most notable is by Ken Haycock, who, in his very smart essay, “Librarianship: Intersecting Perspectives for the Academy and from the Field,” writes that in order for the profession to retain its valued concentration on “the user’s needs and the public’s right to know,” programs and instructors should focus on “librarianship as a profession and vocation and not simply about libraries as institution and place” (64). He effectively utilizes the same argument when addressing the controversy surrounding the semantics of titles, in which “information studies” supplants “librarianship.” (On a different note, be sure to peruse Haycock’s interesting observation on how library culture is “inherently unhealthy” [68].) Although all the essays here are engaging, the most inspiring are the honest, invigorating pieces about librarianship by Mary K. Chelton, Gillian McCombs, and Lotsee Patterson. In her essay, “Serving Young Adults in Libraries: A Professional Life’s Work,” Chelton candidly speaks about the ups and downs of developing suffi cient young adult services, about library organizations’ helping and complicating the process, and about an evolving philosophy to “question the status quo” (34). McCombs’s witty “The Fog of My Career: Some Refl ections and Lessons Learned (with apologies to Errol Morris and Robert S. McNamara)” shares some life lessons learned along a rambling path of librarianship, such as “Lesson No. 6: Sometimes life is hell and you just have to get through it” (84). And although Patterson’s “Refl ections on a Passion” takes a more serious tone, it’s equally insightful reading about her experiences creating tribal libraries from scratch—an especially admirable feat, considering the lack of support often given to such projects. The timely publication of and the renowned authors in Perspectives, Insights & Priorities will greatly appeal to library students, while the immense diversity of topics and perfect balance of political fodder with inspirational passages will prove stimulating and reaffi rming for all librarians. (Now if we could just get library users and community members to read it.)","PeriodicalId":81853,"journal":{"name":"Libraries & culture","volume":"41 1","pages":"415 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LAC.2006.0050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paper Talk: A History of Libraries, Print Culture, and Aboriginal Peoples in Canada before 1960 (review)\",\"authors\":\"S. Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/LAC.2006.0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"He asserts that many libraries simply did not advertise their abilities to supply election information to the public; they also failed to collect viewpoints on all major issues that would have helped “correct the misinformation that was everywhere during the campaign” (14). Berry later specifi es how libraries can and should repair this apathy. McCook also delves into this theme of democracy and bridges her personal journey as a librarian in the turbulent 1960s with that of today. She writes of the continuing importance for libraries to advocate social justice: challenge library closings and censorship, support workers’ rights, and secure “preferential treatment to poor people and the homeless” (97). Few essays in this collection deal solely with library education, but many do include brief mentions. The most notable is by Ken Haycock, who, in his very smart essay, “Librarianship: Intersecting Perspectives for the Academy and from the Field,” writes that in order for the profession to retain its valued concentration on “the user’s needs and the public’s right to know,” programs and instructors should focus on “librarianship as a profession and vocation and not simply about libraries as institution and place” (64). He effectively utilizes the same argument when addressing the controversy surrounding the semantics of titles, in which “information studies” supplants “librarianship.” (On a different note, be sure to peruse Haycock’s interesting observation on how library culture is “inherently unhealthy” [68].) Although all the essays here are engaging, the most inspiring are the honest, invigorating pieces about librarianship by Mary K. Chelton, Gillian McCombs, and Lotsee Patterson. In her essay, “Serving Young Adults in Libraries: A Professional Life’s Work,” Chelton candidly speaks about the ups and downs of developing suffi cient young adult services, about library organizations’ helping and complicating the process, and about an evolving philosophy to “question the status quo” (34). McCombs’s witty “The Fog of My Career: Some Refl ections and Lessons Learned (with apologies to Errol Morris and Robert S. McNamara)” shares some life lessons learned along a rambling path of librarianship, such as “Lesson No. 6: Sometimes life is hell and you just have to get through it” (84). And although Patterson’s “Refl ections on a Passion” takes a more serious tone, it’s equally insightful reading about her experiences creating tribal libraries from scratch—an especially admirable feat, considering the lack of support often given to such projects. The timely publication of and the renowned authors in Perspectives, Insights & Priorities will greatly appeal to library students, while the immense diversity of topics and perfect balance of political fodder with inspirational passages will prove stimulating and reaffi rming for all librarians. (Now if we could just get library users and community members to read it.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":81853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Libraries & culture\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"415 - 417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LAC.2006.0050\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Libraries & culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/LAC.2006.0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libraries & culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/LAC.2006.0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
他断言,许多图书馆根本没有宣传它们向公众提供选举信息的能力;他们也未能就所有重大问题收集观点,而这些观点本可以帮助“纠正竞选期间无处不在的错误信息”(14)。Berry后来详细说明了图书馆可以并且应该如何修复这种冷漠。麦库克还深入探讨了民主这一主题,并将她作为一名图书管理员在动荡的20世纪60年代的个人经历与今天的经历联系起来。她在书中写道,图书馆倡导社会正义的重要性持续存在:挑战图书馆关闭和审查制度,支持工人权利,确保“穷人和无家可归者的优先待遇”(97)。这本文集中很少有文章只涉及图书馆教育,但许多文章都有简短的提及。最值得注意的是肯·海科克(Ken Haycock),他在他那篇非常聪明的文章《图书馆事业:学院与实践的交叉视角》(Librarianship: Intersecting Perspectives for The Academy and from The Field)中写道,为了让这个职业保持对“用户需求和公众知情权”的宝贵关注,项目和教师应该把“图书馆事业作为一种职业和职业,而不仅仅是把图书馆作为一种机构和场所”(64)。在解决围绕标题语义的争议时,他有效地利用了同样的论点,其中“信息研究”取代了“图书馆学”。(另一方面,请务必仔细阅读海科克关于图书馆文化“本质上是不健康的”的有趣观察[68]。)虽然这里所有的文章都很吸引人,但最鼓舞人心的是玛丽·k·切尔顿、吉莉安·麦库姆斯和洛特西·帕特森关于图书馆事业的诚实、振奋人心的文章。在她的文章《在图书馆为年轻人服务:职业生涯的工作》中,Chelton坦率地谈到了发展充分的年轻人服务的起起落落,图书馆组织的帮助和复杂的过程,以及一种不断发展的哲学“质疑现状”(34)。麦库姆斯诙谐的《我职业生涯的迷雾:一些反思和经验教训》(向埃罗尔·莫里斯和罗伯特·s·麦克纳马拉道歉)分享了在图书馆工作的漫漫道路上学到的一些人生教训,比如“第六课:有时生活是地狱,你必须要度过它”(84)。尽管帕特森的《对激情的反思》采用了更为严肃的语气,但她从零开始创建部落图书馆的经历同样具有深刻的见解——考虑到此类项目通常缺乏支持,这是一项特别令人钦佩的壮举。《观点、见解和优先事项》的及时出版和著名作者的出版将极大地吸引图书馆学生,而主题的巨大多样性和政治素材与鼓舞人心的段落的完美平衡将证明对所有图书馆员的激励和重申。(现在,如果我们能让图书馆用户和社区成员阅读它就好了。)
Paper Talk: A History of Libraries, Print Culture, and Aboriginal Peoples in Canada before 1960 (review)
He asserts that many libraries simply did not advertise their abilities to supply election information to the public; they also failed to collect viewpoints on all major issues that would have helped “correct the misinformation that was everywhere during the campaign” (14). Berry later specifi es how libraries can and should repair this apathy. McCook also delves into this theme of democracy and bridges her personal journey as a librarian in the turbulent 1960s with that of today. She writes of the continuing importance for libraries to advocate social justice: challenge library closings and censorship, support workers’ rights, and secure “preferential treatment to poor people and the homeless” (97). Few essays in this collection deal solely with library education, but many do include brief mentions. The most notable is by Ken Haycock, who, in his very smart essay, “Librarianship: Intersecting Perspectives for the Academy and from the Field,” writes that in order for the profession to retain its valued concentration on “the user’s needs and the public’s right to know,” programs and instructors should focus on “librarianship as a profession and vocation and not simply about libraries as institution and place” (64). He effectively utilizes the same argument when addressing the controversy surrounding the semantics of titles, in which “information studies” supplants “librarianship.” (On a different note, be sure to peruse Haycock’s interesting observation on how library culture is “inherently unhealthy” [68].) Although all the essays here are engaging, the most inspiring are the honest, invigorating pieces about librarianship by Mary K. Chelton, Gillian McCombs, and Lotsee Patterson. In her essay, “Serving Young Adults in Libraries: A Professional Life’s Work,” Chelton candidly speaks about the ups and downs of developing suffi cient young adult services, about library organizations’ helping and complicating the process, and about an evolving philosophy to “question the status quo” (34). McCombs’s witty “The Fog of My Career: Some Refl ections and Lessons Learned (with apologies to Errol Morris and Robert S. McNamara)” shares some life lessons learned along a rambling path of librarianship, such as “Lesson No. 6: Sometimes life is hell and you just have to get through it” (84). And although Patterson’s “Refl ections on a Passion” takes a more serious tone, it’s equally insightful reading about her experiences creating tribal libraries from scratch—an especially admirable feat, considering the lack of support often given to such projects. The timely publication of and the renowned authors in Perspectives, Insights & Priorities will greatly appeal to library students, while the immense diversity of topics and perfect balance of political fodder with inspirational passages will prove stimulating and reaffi rming for all librarians. (Now if we could just get library users and community members to read it.)