图书馆情报学课程中的历史:一场辩论的提纲

Christine Pawley
{"title":"图书馆情报学课程中的历史:一场辩论的提纲","authors":"Christine Pawley","doi":"10.1353/LAC.2005.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Only a small minority of Library and Information Science (LIS) schools now schedule courses with a historical focus, and LIS faculty whose research specialty is history seem to be a vanishing breed. Yet some educators are committed to finding ways to preserve historical perspectives in the master's degree curriculum. At the 2004 conference of the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) the Historical Perspectives Special Interest Group (SIG) discussed strategies and subsequently carried on the debate in an online forum. Theoretical justifications for including history in the curriculum appealed to both generalist and specific rationales that argued for \"history as story\" as well as \"history as process,\" while practical suggestions included focusing on the preservation of documents, adopting the principles and methods of public history, and creating stronger avenues for collaboration among all historians of libraries and information science, no matter what their disciplinary affiliation. Overall, participants felt that in the current economic climate modestly scaled efforts stood the best chance of success.","PeriodicalId":81853,"journal":{"name":"Libraries & culture","volume":"40 1","pages":"223 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LAC.2005.0057","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History in the Library and Information Science Curriculum: Outline of a Debate\",\"authors\":\"Christine Pawley\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/LAC.2005.0057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Only a small minority of Library and Information Science (LIS) schools now schedule courses with a historical focus, and LIS faculty whose research specialty is history seem to be a vanishing breed. Yet some educators are committed to finding ways to preserve historical perspectives in the master's degree curriculum. At the 2004 conference of the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) the Historical Perspectives Special Interest Group (SIG) discussed strategies and subsequently carried on the debate in an online forum. Theoretical justifications for including history in the curriculum appealed to both generalist and specific rationales that argued for \\\"history as story\\\" as well as \\\"history as process,\\\" while practical suggestions included focusing on the preservation of documents, adopting the principles and methods of public history, and creating stronger avenues for collaboration among all historians of libraries and information science, no matter what their disciplinary affiliation. Overall, participants felt that in the current economic climate modestly scaled efforts stood the best chance of success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Libraries & culture\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"223 - 238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LAC.2005.0057\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Libraries & culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/LAC.2005.0057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libraries & culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/LAC.2005.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

现在,只有一小部分图书馆与信息科学(Library and Information Science, LIS)学院安排了以历史为重点的课程,而以历史为研究专业的图书馆与信息科学学院似乎正在消失。然而,一些教育工作者致力于寻找在硕士学位课程中保留历史视角的方法。在图书馆与信息科学教育协会(ALISE) 2004年的会议上,历史视角特别兴趣小组(SIG)讨论了策略,并随后在一个在线论坛上进行了辩论。将历史纳入课程的理论依据,既有通才的理由,也有具体的理由,认为“历史是故事”和“历史是过程”,而实际的建议包括关注文献的保存,采用公共历史的原则和方法,以及为图书馆和信息科学的所有历史学家之间建立更强大的合作渠道,无论他们属于什么学科。总的来说,与会者认为,在目前的经济气候下,适度规模的努力最有可能取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
History in the Library and Information Science Curriculum: Outline of a Debate
Only a small minority of Library and Information Science (LIS) schools now schedule courses with a historical focus, and LIS faculty whose research specialty is history seem to be a vanishing breed. Yet some educators are committed to finding ways to preserve historical perspectives in the master's degree curriculum. At the 2004 conference of the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) the Historical Perspectives Special Interest Group (SIG) discussed strategies and subsequently carried on the debate in an online forum. Theoretical justifications for including history in the curriculum appealed to both generalist and specific rationales that argued for "history as story" as well as "history as process," while practical suggestions included focusing on the preservation of documents, adopting the principles and methods of public history, and creating stronger avenues for collaboration among all historians of libraries and information science, no matter what their disciplinary affiliation. Overall, participants felt that in the current economic climate modestly scaled efforts stood the best chance of success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信