消除大学录取中的种族偏好

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS

Economists Voice Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.1515/1553-3832.1908

Dennis L. Weisman, G. Robinson

{"title":"消除大学录取中的种族偏好","authors":"Dennis L. Weisman, G. Robinson","doi":"10.1515/1553-3832.1908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critics of affirmative action policies contend that the elimination of racial preferences in college admissions would lead to a “more-able” student body. In a system in which other non-meritocratic elements other than race play an important role there is no reason to think that the slot filled by the race-preferred candidate will be filled by another candidate of higher “quality.”","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eiminating Racial Preferences in College Admissions\",\"authors\":\"Dennis L. Weisman, G. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/1553-3832.1908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critics of affirmative action policies contend that the elimination of racial preferences in college admissions would lead to a “more-able” student body. In a system in which other non-meritocratic elements other than race play an important role there is no reason to think that the slot filled by the race-preferred candidate will be filled by another candidate of higher “quality.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":42390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economists Voice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economists Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/1553-3832.1908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economists Voice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/1553-3832.1908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

对平权行动政策持批评态度的人认为，取消大学录取中的种族偏好，将导致一个“更有能力”的学生群体。在一个非精英因素而非种族因素发挥重要作用的体系中，没有理由认为由种族优先候选人填补的空缺将由另一位“质量”更高的候选人填补。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Eiminating Racial Preferences in College Admissions

Critics of affirmative action policies contend that the elimination of racial preferences in college admissions would lead to a “more-able” student body. In a system in which other non-meritocratic elements other than race play an important role there is no reason to think that the slot filled by the race-preferred candidate will be filled by another candidate of higher “quality.”

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economists Voice ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.