抑制高频交易的危险

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS

Economists Voice Pub Date : 2012-02-20 DOI:10.1515/1553-3832.1885

M. Clements

引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他形式的算法交易不同，高频交易几乎没有或根本没有社会价值。静态规则的实施将保留算法交易的好处，同时消除高频交易的潜在危害。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Curbing the Dangers of High-Frequency Trading

High-frequency trading, as distinct from other forms of algorithmic trading, is of little or no social value. Implementation of resting rules would retain the benefits of algorithmic trading while eliminating the potential harm of high-frequency trading.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economists Voice ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.