Amal M. Alsubaie , Andy Sanderson , Hélio V. Cabral , Eduardo Martinez-Valdes , Deborah Falla
{"title":"慢性腰痛患者在重复性举重任务中脊柱运动变异性增加。","authors":"Amal M. Alsubaie , Andy Sanderson , Hélio V. Cabral , Eduardo Martinez-Valdes , Deborah Falla","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Changes in spinal kinematic variability have been observed in people with chronic non-specific LBP (CNSLBP) during the performance of various repetitive functional tasks. However, the direction of these changes (i.e., less or more kinematic variability) is not consistent. This study aimed to assess differences in kinematic variability of the 3D angular displacement of thoracic and lumbar spinal segments in people with CNSLBP compared to asymptomatic individuals during a repetitive lifting task. Eleven people with CNSLBP and 11 asymptomatic volunteers performed 10 cycles of multi-planar lifting movements while spinal kinematics were recorded. For the three planes of motion, point-by-point standard deviations (SDs) were computed across all cycles of lifting and the average was calculated as a measure of kinematic variability for both segments. People with CNSLBP displayed higher thoracic (F = 8.00, <em>p</em> = 0.010, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.286) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.48, <em>p</em> = 0.030, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.215) in the sagittal plane. Moreover, group differences were observed in the transversal plane for thoracic (F = 7.62, <em>p</em> = 0.012, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.276) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.402, <em>p</em> = 0.031, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.213), as well as in the frontal plane for thoracic (F = 7.27, <em>p</em> = 0.014, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.267) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 6.11, <em>p</em> = 0.022, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.234), all showing higher variability in those with CNSLBP. A significant main effect of group was not detected (<em>p</em> > 0.05) for spinal range of motion (ROM). Thus, people with CNSLBP completed the lifting task with the same ROM in all three planes of motion as observed for asymptomatic individuals, yet they performed the lifting task with higher spinal kinematic cycle-to-cycle variation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 102832"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000913/pdfft?md5=2ed5f9d76f0b0cee33259db7d1b3ee1f&pid=1-s2.0-S1050641123000913-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal kinematic variability is increased in people with chronic low back pain during a repetitive lifting task\",\"authors\":\"Amal M. Alsubaie , Andy Sanderson , Hélio V. Cabral , Eduardo Martinez-Valdes , Deborah Falla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Changes in spinal kinematic variability have been observed in people with chronic non-specific LBP (CNSLBP) during the performance of various repetitive functional tasks. However, the direction of these changes (i.e., less or more kinematic variability) is not consistent. This study aimed to assess differences in kinematic variability of the 3D angular displacement of thoracic and lumbar spinal segments in people with CNSLBP compared to asymptomatic individuals during a repetitive lifting task. Eleven people with CNSLBP and 11 asymptomatic volunteers performed 10 cycles of multi-planar lifting movements while spinal kinematics were recorded. For the three planes of motion, point-by-point standard deviations (SDs) were computed across all cycles of lifting and the average was calculated as a measure of kinematic variability for both segments. People with CNSLBP displayed higher thoracic (F = 8.00, <em>p</em> = 0.010, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.286) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.48, <em>p</em> = 0.030, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.215) in the sagittal plane. Moreover, group differences were observed in the transversal plane for thoracic (F = 7.62, <em>p</em> = 0.012, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.276) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.402, <em>p</em> = 0.031, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.213), as well as in the frontal plane for thoracic (F = 7.27, <em>p</em> = 0.014, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.267) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 6.11, <em>p</em> = 0.022, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.234), all showing higher variability in those with CNSLBP. A significant main effect of group was not detected (<em>p</em> > 0.05) for spinal range of motion (ROM). Thus, people with CNSLBP completed the lifting task with the same ROM in all three planes of motion as observed for asymptomatic individuals, yet they performed the lifting task with higher spinal kinematic cycle-to-cycle variation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000913/pdfft?md5=2ed5f9d76f0b0cee33259db7d1b3ee1f&pid=1-s2.0-S1050641123000913-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000913\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spinal kinematic variability is increased in people with chronic low back pain during a repetitive lifting task
Changes in spinal kinematic variability have been observed in people with chronic non-specific LBP (CNSLBP) during the performance of various repetitive functional tasks. However, the direction of these changes (i.e., less or more kinematic variability) is not consistent. This study aimed to assess differences in kinematic variability of the 3D angular displacement of thoracic and lumbar spinal segments in people with CNSLBP compared to asymptomatic individuals during a repetitive lifting task. Eleven people with CNSLBP and 11 asymptomatic volunteers performed 10 cycles of multi-planar lifting movements while spinal kinematics were recorded. For the three planes of motion, point-by-point standard deviations (SDs) were computed across all cycles of lifting and the average was calculated as a measure of kinematic variability for both segments. People with CNSLBP displayed higher thoracic (F = 8.00, p = 0.010, ηp2 = 0.286) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.48, p = 0.030, ηp2 = 0.215) in the sagittal plane. Moreover, group differences were observed in the transversal plane for thoracic (F = 7.62, p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.276) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.402, p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.213), as well as in the frontal plane for thoracic (F = 7.27, p = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.267) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 6.11, p = 0.022, ηp2 = 0.234), all showing higher variability in those with CNSLBP. A significant main effect of group was not detected (p > 0.05) for spinal range of motion (ROM). Thus, people with CNSLBP completed the lifting task with the same ROM in all three planes of motion as observed for asymptomatic individuals, yet they performed the lifting task with higher spinal kinematic cycle-to-cycle variation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques.
As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.