会计原则选择由ADR事务所和审计师收费决定

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
David Senteney, Grace Gao, Mohammad S. Bazaz
{"title":"会计原则选择由ADR事务所和审计师收费决定","authors":"David Senteney, Grace Gao, Mohammad S. Bazaz","doi":"10.1504/IJAAPE.2014.066390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines whether ADR issuers, selecting US GAAP, IFRS, or home-country accounting principles for the preparation of financial statements accompanying the Form 20-F filing, are paying different auditors’ fees. We employ the Heckman Probit decision choice model and two-stage OLS correction to estimate the impact of selection of Form 20-F accounting standards upon ADR firms periodic auditors’ fees. We find that firms choosing to present US GAAP financial statements incur the highest auditors’ fees, while firms choosing to present IFRS financial statements accompanying the Form 20-F filing incur the second largest auditors’ fees. They also find that ADR firms incur significantly greater costs (associated with Form 20-F filings) than non-US firms opting not to list on the major US stock exchanges in order to improve comparability with other firms listed on the major US exchanges.","PeriodicalId":35413,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJAAPE.2014.066390","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting principle choice by ADR firms and auditors' fees\",\"authors\":\"David Senteney, Grace Gao, Mohammad S. Bazaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJAAPE.2014.066390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines whether ADR issuers, selecting US GAAP, IFRS, or home-country accounting principles for the preparation of financial statements accompanying the Form 20-F filing, are paying different auditors’ fees. We employ the Heckman Probit decision choice model and two-stage OLS correction to estimate the impact of selection of Form 20-F accounting standards upon ADR firms periodic auditors’ fees. We find that firms choosing to present US GAAP financial statements incur the highest auditors’ fees, while firms choosing to present IFRS financial statements accompanying the Form 20-F filing incur the second largest auditors’ fees. They also find that ADR firms incur significantly greater costs (associated with Form 20-F filings) than non-US firms opting not to list on the major US stock exchanges in order to improve comparability with other firms listed on the major US exchanges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJAAPE.2014.066390\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2014.066390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2014.066390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了ADR发行人在选择美国公认会计准则(US GAAP)、国际财务报告准则(IFRS)或本国会计准则编制财务报表时,是否支付了不同的审计师费用。我们采用Heckman Probit决策选择模型和两阶段OLS修正来估计表格20-F会计准则的选择对ADR公司定期审计师费用的影响。我们发现,选择提交美国公认会计准则财务报表的公司会产生最高的审计师费用,而选择提交国际财务报告准则财务报表并附上表格20-F的公司会产生第二大审计师费用。他们还发现,为了提高与其他在美国主要交易所上市的公司的可比性,选择不在美国主要证券交易所上市的非美国公司相比,ADR公司产生的成本(与表格20-F相关)要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accounting principle choice by ADR firms and auditors' fees
This paper examines whether ADR issuers, selecting US GAAP, IFRS, or home-country accounting principles for the preparation of financial statements accompanying the Form 20-F filing, are paying different auditors’ fees. We employ the Heckman Probit decision choice model and two-stage OLS correction to estimate the impact of selection of Form 20-F accounting standards upon ADR firms periodic auditors’ fees. We find that firms choosing to present US GAAP financial statements incur the highest auditors’ fees, while firms choosing to present IFRS financial statements accompanying the Form 20-F filing incur the second largest auditors’ fees. They also find that ADR firms incur significantly greater costs (associated with Form 20-F filings) than non-US firms opting not to list on the major US stock exchanges in order to improve comparability with other firms listed on the major US exchanges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: IJAAPE publishes original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of: financial accounting, managerial accounting, accounting education, auditing, taxation, public sector accounting, capital market and accounting, accounting information systems, performance evaluation, corporate governance, ethics, and financial management. All methodologies, such as analytical, empirical, behavioural, surveys, and case studies are welcome. IJAAPE encourages contributions especially from emerging markets and economies in transition and studies whose results are applicable across nation states or capable of being adapted to the different accounting and business environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信