逆动力学骨骼和肌肉模型的比较

S. Mari, E. Pennestrì, Martina Trebbi, F. Nappi, D. Rughi
{"title":"逆动力学骨骼和肌肉模型的比较","authors":"S. Mari, E. Pennestrì, Martina Trebbi, F. Nappi, D. Rughi","doi":"10.1504/IJECB.2012.049807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This investigation has the purpose of developing and cross-validating algorithms and software tools for quantitative ergonomic analyses of workers movements. In particular, the results from a skeletal inverse dynamics model are directly compared with those obtained from a muscular model herein proposed. Both models rely upon experimentally gathered kinematic and electromyography data. \n \nThe 2D skeletal model is based on a multibody dynamics formulation. The software implementation can perform both kinematic and inverse dynamic analyses. Kinematic input data required by the model have been collected using an optoelectronic human motion capture system. The kinematics of the model has been compared with experimentally collected data. \n \nThe muscular electromyography (EMG)-assisted model discussed is particularly suitable for biarticular muscles. Joint torques, muscular forces and powers can be also estimated. The inputs required by this model have been collected recording surface electromyographic signals and using some kinematic output from the skeletal model. The results from mathematical models have been compared for cross-validation, and their adequacy for ergonomy analyses assessed.","PeriodicalId":90184,"journal":{"name":"International journal of experimental and computational biomechanics","volume":"2 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJECB.2012.049807","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between inverse dynamics skeletal and muscular models\",\"authors\":\"S. Mari, E. Pennestrì, Martina Trebbi, F. Nappi, D. Rughi\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJECB.2012.049807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This investigation has the purpose of developing and cross-validating algorithms and software tools for quantitative ergonomic analyses of workers movements. In particular, the results from a skeletal inverse dynamics model are directly compared with those obtained from a muscular model herein proposed. Both models rely upon experimentally gathered kinematic and electromyography data. \\n \\nThe 2D skeletal model is based on a multibody dynamics formulation. The software implementation can perform both kinematic and inverse dynamic analyses. Kinematic input data required by the model have been collected using an optoelectronic human motion capture system. The kinematics of the model has been compared with experimentally collected data. \\n \\nThe muscular electromyography (EMG)-assisted model discussed is particularly suitable for biarticular muscles. Joint torques, muscular forces and powers can be also estimated. The inputs required by this model have been collected recording surface electromyographic signals and using some kinematic output from the skeletal model. The results from mathematical models have been compared for cross-validation, and their adequacy for ergonomy analyses assessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of experimental and computational biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJECB.2012.049807\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of experimental and computational biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECB.2012.049807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of experimental and computational biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECB.2012.049807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项调查的目的是开发和交叉验证算法和软件工具,用于工人运动的定量人体工程学分析。特别地,骨骼逆动力学模型的结果直接与本文提出的肌肉模型的结果进行了比较。这两种模型都依赖于实验收集的运动学和肌电图数据。二维骨骼模型基于多体动力学公式。软件实现可以进行运动学和逆动力学分析。利用光电人体运动捕捉系统收集了模型所需的运动学输入数据。模型的运动学与实验数据进行了比较。所讨论的肌肉肌电图(EMG)辅助模型特别适用于双关节肌肉。关节扭矩,肌肉力量和功率也可以估计。该模型所需的输入已被收集,记录表面肌电图信号并使用骨骼模型的一些运动学输出。数学模型的结果进行了交叉验证的比较,并评估了其对人体工程学分析的充分性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison between inverse dynamics skeletal and muscular models
This investigation has the purpose of developing and cross-validating algorithms and software tools for quantitative ergonomic analyses of workers movements. In particular, the results from a skeletal inverse dynamics model are directly compared with those obtained from a muscular model herein proposed. Both models rely upon experimentally gathered kinematic and electromyography data. The 2D skeletal model is based on a multibody dynamics formulation. The software implementation can perform both kinematic and inverse dynamic analyses. Kinematic input data required by the model have been collected using an optoelectronic human motion capture system. The kinematics of the model has been compared with experimentally collected data. The muscular electromyography (EMG)-assisted model discussed is particularly suitable for biarticular muscles. Joint torques, muscular forces and powers can be also estimated. The inputs required by this model have been collected recording surface electromyographic signals and using some kinematic output from the skeletal model. The results from mathematical models have been compared for cross-validation, and their adequacy for ergonomy analyses assessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信