信用专业人士的两种想法:权责发生制与现金制会计信息

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Harri Seppänen, Timo Teinilä
{"title":"信用专业人士的两种想法:权责发生制与现金制会计信息","authors":"Harri Seppänen, Timo Teinilä","doi":"10.1504/ijmfa.2022.10045162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To explore in what ways and what elements of financial statement information is important for credit practitioners, we employ a survey method to obtain new evidence. We ask if there is evidence on the existence of two different types of views to accounting information, namely accrual accounting and cash accounting emphasis. The two views come out robustly throughout our analysis, and they are consistently linked both to credit professional’s experience, and task complexity. We infer our evidence to be consistent with the explanations for co-existence of differential information preferences advanced in behavioral accounting literature related to individuals’ cognitive constraints in use of accounting information. We discuss the implications of our results for credit professionals, accounting standard setters, and researchers.","PeriodicalId":43684,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two minds of credit professionals: accrual vs. cash accounting information\",\"authors\":\"Harri Seppänen, Timo Teinilä\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijmfa.2022.10045162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": To explore in what ways and what elements of financial statement information is important for credit practitioners, we employ a survey method to obtain new evidence. We ask if there is evidence on the existence of two different types of views to accounting information, namely accrual accounting and cash accounting emphasis. The two views come out robustly throughout our analysis, and they are consistently linked both to credit professional’s experience, and task complexity. We infer our evidence to be consistent with the explanations for co-existence of differential information preferences advanced in behavioral accounting literature related to individuals’ cognitive constraints in use of accounting information. We discuss the implications of our results for credit professionals, accounting standard setters, and researchers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmfa.2022.10045162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmfa.2022.10045162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了探索财务报表信息的哪些方面和哪些要素对信贷从业人员来说是重要的,我们采用了一种调查方法来获取新的证据。我们询问是否有证据表明存在两种不同类型的会计信息观点,即权责发生制会计和现金会计强调。这两种观点在我们的分析中得到了强有力的体现,它们始终与信贷专业人员的经验和任务复杂性联系在一起。我们推断我们的证据与行为会计文献中关于个体在会计信息使用中的认知约束的差异信息偏好共存的解释是一致的。我们讨论了我们的结果对信贷专业人士,会计准则制定者和研究人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two minds of credit professionals: accrual vs. cash accounting information
: To explore in what ways and what elements of financial statement information is important for credit practitioners, we employ a survey method to obtain new evidence. We ask if there is evidence on the existence of two different types of views to accounting information, namely accrual accounting and cash accounting emphasis. The two views come out robustly throughout our analysis, and they are consistently linked both to credit professional’s experience, and task complexity. We infer our evidence to be consistent with the explanations for co-existence of differential information preferences advanced in behavioral accounting literature related to individuals’ cognitive constraints in use of accounting information. We discuss the implications of our results for credit professionals, accounting standard setters, and researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: IJMFA covers all aspects of managerial and financial accounting. The key difference between managerial and financial accounting is that managerial accounting information is aimed at helping managers within the organisation, while financial accounting is aimed at providing information to external parties. In today''s advanced manufacturing environment, various issues arise for accounting standard-setting practicing professionals. Solving the separate issues of managerial and financial accounting is a significant challenge, and IJMFA assists researchers in overcoming these challenges in an efficient, effective manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信