中老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的外科治疗

Q3 Medicine
Роман Владимирович Халепа, Владимир Сергеевич Климов, Джамиль Афетович Рзаев, И.И. Василенко, Евгений Владимирович Конев, Евгения Валерьевна Амелина
{"title":"中老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的外科治疗","authors":"Роман Владимирович Халепа, Владимир Сергеевич Климов, Джамиль Афетович Рзаев, И.И. Василенко, Евгений Владимирович Конев, Евгения Валерьевна Амелина","doi":"10.14531/SS2018.3.73-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To analyze the results of surgical treatment of patients of the older age group with central spinal stenosis at the lumbar level. Material and Methods. A total of 107 patients of elderly and senile age with clinically significant degenerative central stenosis of the spinal canal were treated. They were divided into two groups: patients in Group 1 underwent bilateral decompression of nerve roots through unilateral approach; those in Group 2 - nerve root decompression supplemented with interbody fusion and transpedicular fixation. Results. The surgery resulted in statistically significant reduction in pain, improvement of the quality of life, enlargement of spinal canal dimension parameters, and increase in the distance of walking. Statistical difference in the quality of life between Groups 1 and 2 was revealed for the indicator characterizing the psychological component of the SF-36 questionnaire (p = 0.03); there were no statistical differences for the remaining indicators. The key parameter for assessing central stenosis is the cross-sectional area of the dural sac. Conclusion. Preoperative examination of patients of the older age group should be comprehensive and include CT myelography with 3D reconstruction. The cause of nerve root compression in central stenosis is a combination of various factors in 41.9 % of cases. Differential surgical tactics provides an improvement in the quality of life in 80 % of cases. Excessive decompression does not improve the quality of life of patients. Instrumental fixation does not improve the outcome of surgical intervention and should be used only for clinically significant instability of the spinal motion segment.","PeriodicalId":37253,"journal":{"name":"Hirurgia Pozvonochnika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ELDERLY AND SENILE PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE CENTRAL LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS\",\"authors\":\"Роман Владимирович Халепа, Владимир Сергеевич Климов, Джамиль Афетович Рзаев, И.И. Василенко, Евгений Владимирович Конев, Евгения Валерьевна Амелина\",\"doi\":\"10.14531/SS2018.3.73-84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To analyze the results of surgical treatment of patients of the older age group with central spinal stenosis at the lumbar level. Material and Methods. A total of 107 patients of elderly and senile age with clinically significant degenerative central stenosis of the spinal canal were treated. They were divided into two groups: patients in Group 1 underwent bilateral decompression of nerve roots through unilateral approach; those in Group 2 - nerve root decompression supplemented with interbody fusion and transpedicular fixation. Results. The surgery resulted in statistically significant reduction in pain, improvement of the quality of life, enlargement of spinal canal dimension parameters, and increase in the distance of walking. Statistical difference in the quality of life between Groups 1 and 2 was revealed for the indicator characterizing the psychological component of the SF-36 questionnaire (p = 0.03); there were no statistical differences for the remaining indicators. The key parameter for assessing central stenosis is the cross-sectional area of the dural sac. Conclusion. Preoperative examination of patients of the older age group should be comprehensive and include CT myelography with 3D reconstruction. The cause of nerve root compression in central stenosis is a combination of various factors in 41.9 % of cases. Differential surgical tactics provides an improvement in the quality of life in 80 % of cases. Excessive decompression does not improve the quality of life of patients. Instrumental fixation does not improve the outcome of surgical intervention and should be used only for clinically significant instability of the spinal motion segment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hirurgia Pozvonochnika\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hirurgia Pozvonochnika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14531/SS2018.3.73-84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hirurgia Pozvonochnika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14531/SS2018.3.73-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目标。目的:分析高龄组腰椎节段椎管狭窄的手术治疗效果。材料和方法。本文对107例临床表现明显的中枢性椎管退行性狭窄的中老年患者进行了治疗。患者分为两组:1组患者通过单侧入路行双侧神经根减压术;第二组采用神经根减压联合椎间融合和经椎弓根固定。结果。术后疼痛明显减轻,生活质量改善,椎管尺寸参数增大,行走距离增加。SF-36问卷中表征心理成分的指标显示,1组和2组的生活质量存在统计学差异(p = 0.03);其余指标无统计学差异。评估中枢性狭窄的关键参数是硬膜囊的横截面积。结论。老年患者术前检查应全面,包括CT脊髓造影和三维重建。41.9%的中枢性狭窄患者神经根受压是多种因素共同作用的结果。在80%的病例中,不同的手术策略提供了生活质量的改善。过度减压并不能提高患者的生活质量。器械固定不能改善手术干预的结果,只能用于有临床意义的脊柱运动节段不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ELDERLY AND SENILE PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE CENTRAL LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
Objective. To analyze the results of surgical treatment of patients of the older age group with central spinal stenosis at the lumbar level. Material and Methods. A total of 107 patients of elderly and senile age with clinically significant degenerative central stenosis of the spinal canal were treated. They were divided into two groups: patients in Group 1 underwent bilateral decompression of nerve roots through unilateral approach; those in Group 2 - nerve root decompression supplemented with interbody fusion and transpedicular fixation. Results. The surgery resulted in statistically significant reduction in pain, improvement of the quality of life, enlargement of spinal canal dimension parameters, and increase in the distance of walking. Statistical difference in the quality of life between Groups 1 and 2 was revealed for the indicator characterizing the psychological component of the SF-36 questionnaire (p = 0.03); there were no statistical differences for the remaining indicators. The key parameter for assessing central stenosis is the cross-sectional area of the dural sac. Conclusion. Preoperative examination of patients of the older age group should be comprehensive and include CT myelography with 3D reconstruction. The cause of nerve root compression in central stenosis is a combination of various factors in 41.9 % of cases. Differential surgical tactics provides an improvement in the quality of life in 80 % of cases. Excessive decompression does not improve the quality of life of patients. Instrumental fixation does not improve the outcome of surgical intervention and should be used only for clinically significant instability of the spinal motion segment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hirurgia Pozvonochnika
Hirurgia Pozvonochnika Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信