员工对近实时反馈干预改善患者体验的看法

Q4 Medicine
Sarah Chessell, Sandra Courtiour, Amanda Colman, S. Porter, V. Heaslip
{"title":"员工对近实时反馈干预改善患者体验的看法","authors":"Sarah Chessell, Sandra Courtiour, Amanda Colman, S. Porter, V. Heaslip","doi":"10.12968/bjhc.2022.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following several major reports of poor quality care in the NHS, including the Francis report, a multi-centre study was undertaken by to improve patient-centred care by implementing near-real time patient feedback. This article follows on from this and explores the experiences of staff from one hospital involved in the multi-centre study, including the learning from the intervention and how it affected their practice. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight individuals who were involved in the original study, including five clinical staff members and three volunteers. Responses were transcribed and analysed thematically. The interviews highlighted four inter-related themes: the importance of communication; normalising feedback; confidence to talk to patients; and seeing from the patient perspective. Participants described how near real-time feedback enhanced communication, giving them confidence to interact with patients. Staff responded to negative patient feedback by making improvements to patient experiences. However, the initiative was not sustained following the conclusion of the study. Near-real time patient feedback can be effective in improving staff–patient communication and creating a more positive experience for both patients and staff. However, this study highlights the need to examine the sustainability of improvement initiatives, as well as their initial effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":35342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Care Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staff perspectives of a near-real time feedback intervention to improve patient experiences\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Chessell, Sandra Courtiour, Amanda Colman, S. Porter, V. Heaslip\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjhc.2022.0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following several major reports of poor quality care in the NHS, including the Francis report, a multi-centre study was undertaken by to improve patient-centred care by implementing near-real time patient feedback. This article follows on from this and explores the experiences of staff from one hospital involved in the multi-centre study, including the learning from the intervention and how it affected their practice. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight individuals who were involved in the original study, including five clinical staff members and three volunteers. Responses were transcribed and analysed thematically. The interviews highlighted four inter-related themes: the importance of communication; normalising feedback; confidence to talk to patients; and seeing from the patient perspective. Participants described how near real-time feedback enhanced communication, giving them confidence to interact with patients. Staff responded to negative patient feedback by making improvements to patient experiences. However, the initiative was not sustained following the conclusion of the study. Near-real time patient feedback can be effective in improving staff–patient communication and creating a more positive experience for both patients and staff. However, this study highlights the need to examine the sustainability of improvement initiatives, as well as their initial effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Care Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Care Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2022.0056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2022.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在包括Francis报告在内的几份关于NHS低质量护理的主要报告之后,开展了一项多中心研究,通过实施近实时的患者反馈来改善以患者为中心的护理。本文以此为基础,探讨了一家医院参与多中心研究的工作人员的经验,包括从干预中学到的东西以及它如何影响他们的实践。对参与原始研究的8个人进行了半结构化访谈,其中包括5名临床工作人员和3名志愿者。回答被转录并按主题进行分析。访谈突出了四个相互关联的主题:沟通的重要性;正常化的反馈;自信地与病人交谈;从病人的角度出发。参与者描述了近乎实时的反馈如何增强了沟通,给了他们与患者互动的信心。工作人员通过改善患者体验来回应患者的负面反馈。然而,这项倡议在研究结束后没有继续下去。近乎实时的患者反馈可以有效地改善医患沟通,为患者和员工创造更积极的体验。然而,这项研究强调需要审查改进倡议的可持续性及其初步效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Staff perspectives of a near-real time feedback intervention to improve patient experiences
Following several major reports of poor quality care in the NHS, including the Francis report, a multi-centre study was undertaken by to improve patient-centred care by implementing near-real time patient feedback. This article follows on from this and explores the experiences of staff from one hospital involved in the multi-centre study, including the learning from the intervention and how it affected their practice. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight individuals who were involved in the original study, including five clinical staff members and three volunteers. Responses were transcribed and analysed thematically. The interviews highlighted four inter-related themes: the importance of communication; normalising feedback; confidence to talk to patients; and seeing from the patient perspective. Participants described how near real-time feedback enhanced communication, giving them confidence to interact with patients. Staff responded to negative patient feedback by making improvements to patient experiences. However, the initiative was not sustained following the conclusion of the study. Near-real time patient feedback can be effective in improving staff–patient communication and creating a more positive experience for both patients and staff. However, this study highlights the need to examine the sustainability of improvement initiatives, as well as their initial effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: British Journal of Healthcare Management (BJHCM) is the independent monthly journal which is essential reading for all health service managers, policymakers, influencers and commentators. Launched in 1995, BJHCM mixes peer-reviewed management articles with interviews, analysis and comment to bring you a sharp, topical and valuable insight into what"s happening in and around the NHS. To reflect the way that the NHS is changing, the journal has recently received a major face-lift and several new features now appear alongside BJHCM"s excellent state-of-the-art review articles and celebrated columnists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信