采用GHBMC M50-O评价H-III和THOR在SOI试验中的适用性

Q4 Engineering
Chin-hsu Lin, A. Nayak
{"title":"采用GHBMC M50-O评价H-III和THOR在SOI试验中的适用性","authors":"Chin-hsu Lin, A. Nayak","doi":"10.1504/IJVS.2018.10018897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The NHTSA frontal 90 kph 150 OMDB 35% offset test is a part of the new test protocol being proposed to simulate small overlap and oblique impact crashes in the field. An advanced crash test dummy, THOR, is proposed in the test protocol for injury risk assessment instead of the standard frontal impact dummy Hybrid III (H-III). An integrated vehicle finite element model with H-III, THOR and the GHBMC 50th male models is employed to compare the kinematics and injury differences. In this study, we evaluated the occupant response in the new frontal OMDB test using GHBMC models to quantify and qualify the potential injury pattern and risk in this type of crash. The vehicle model was validated with both a full frontal 35 mph rigid barrier test and the very first frontal OMDB test with the H-III 50th %ile male dummies is conducted. The differences in the measured responses of the H-III and THOR from simulations and tests, and the simulated responses of the GHBMC model, were compared. The additional tissue-level injuries predicted by the GMBMC model, which are beyond the capability of the H-III and THOR dummies, showed the potential injury pattern and risk of occupants in the OMDB test.","PeriodicalId":35143,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vehicle Safety","volume":"10 1","pages":"301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using GHBMC M50-O to assess the suitability of H-III and THOR for the SOI tests\",\"authors\":\"Chin-hsu Lin, A. Nayak\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJVS.2018.10018897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The NHTSA frontal 90 kph 150 OMDB 35% offset test is a part of the new test protocol being proposed to simulate small overlap and oblique impact crashes in the field. An advanced crash test dummy, THOR, is proposed in the test protocol for injury risk assessment instead of the standard frontal impact dummy Hybrid III (H-III). An integrated vehicle finite element model with H-III, THOR and the GHBMC 50th male models is employed to compare the kinematics and injury differences. In this study, we evaluated the occupant response in the new frontal OMDB test using GHBMC models to quantify and qualify the potential injury pattern and risk in this type of crash. The vehicle model was validated with both a full frontal 35 mph rigid barrier test and the very first frontal OMDB test with the H-III 50th %ile male dummies is conducted. The differences in the measured responses of the H-III and THOR from simulations and tests, and the simulated responses of the GHBMC model, were compared. The additional tissue-level injuries predicted by the GMBMC model, which are beyond the capability of the H-III and THOR dummies, showed the potential injury pattern and risk of occupants in the OMDB test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Vehicle Safety\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Vehicle Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVS.2018.10018897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vehicle Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVS.2018.10018897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

NHTSA正面90公里/小时150 OMDB 35%偏移测试是新测试方案的一部分,旨在模拟现场的小重叠和倾斜碰撞。在测试方案中提出了一种先进的碰撞测试假人THOR,用于损伤风险评估,而不是标准的正面碰撞假人Hybrid III (H-III)。采用H-III、THOR和GHBMC 50男性模型的整车有限元模型比较运动学和损伤差异。在这项研究中,我们使用GHBMC模型评估了乘员在新的正面OMDB测试中的反应,以量化和确定此类碰撞中的潜在伤害模式和风险。车辆模型通过35英里/小时的正面刚性屏障测试和首次正面OMDB测试进行了验证,该测试采用了H-III 50%的男性假人。比较了模拟和试验中H-III和THOR的实测响应与GHBMC模型的模拟响应的差异。GMBMC模型预测的额外组织水平损伤超出了H-III和THOR假人的能力,在OMDB测试中显示了乘员的潜在损伤模式和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using GHBMC M50-O to assess the suitability of H-III and THOR for the SOI tests
The NHTSA frontal 90 kph 150 OMDB 35% offset test is a part of the new test protocol being proposed to simulate small overlap and oblique impact crashes in the field. An advanced crash test dummy, THOR, is proposed in the test protocol for injury risk assessment instead of the standard frontal impact dummy Hybrid III (H-III). An integrated vehicle finite element model with H-III, THOR and the GHBMC 50th male models is employed to compare the kinematics and injury differences. In this study, we evaluated the occupant response in the new frontal OMDB test using GHBMC models to quantify and qualify the potential injury pattern and risk in this type of crash. The vehicle model was validated with both a full frontal 35 mph rigid barrier test and the very first frontal OMDB test with the H-III 50th %ile male dummies is conducted. The differences in the measured responses of the H-III and THOR from simulations and tests, and the simulated responses of the GHBMC model, were compared. The additional tissue-level injuries predicted by the GMBMC model, which are beyond the capability of the H-III and THOR dummies, showed the potential injury pattern and risk of occupants in the OMDB test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Vehicle Safety
International Journal of Vehicle Safety Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IJVS aims to provide a refereed and authoritative source of information in the field of vehicle safety design, research, and development. It serves applied scientists, engineers, policy makers and safety advocates with a platform to develop, promote, and coordinate the science, technology and practice of vehicle safety. IJVS also seeks to establish channels of communication between industry and academy, industry and government in the field of vehicle safety. IJVS is published quarterly. It covers the subjects of passive and active safety in road traffic as well as traffic related public health issues, from impact biomechanics to vehicle crashworthiness, and from crash avoidance to intelligent highway systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信