基于生命周期评价的社区堆肥环境影响评价——基于堆肥产品操作类型的案例研究

Q3 Multidisciplinary
R. Aziz, P. Chevakidagarn, S. Danteravanich
{"title":"基于生命周期评价的社区堆肥环境影响评价——基于堆肥产品操作类型的案例研究","authors":"R. Aziz, P. Chevakidagarn, S. Danteravanich","doi":"10.14456/VOL13ISS4PP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate environmental impacts contributed by 2 community composting systems, consisting of powder and granular compost production. The main raw materials of these composts were waste from agricultural and agro industrial activities, including animal manures, and solid waste from palm oil mills and rice mills. Data from field operations of both of the composting systems were collected and analyzed. Both composting systems were classified into 5 sub systems, consisting of raw material collection, composting process, electricity consumption, material transfer, and distribution of the compost product to consumers. Impact assessments of both composting systems revealed that the composting process sub system was the main contributor on impact categories of acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), global warming potential (GWP), and photochemical oxidation potential (POP), while on human toxicity potential (HTP) the distribution sub system was the main contributor. In comparing both systems, it was found that granular compost systems contributed a higher impact than powder compost systems, at 1.1 times on GWP, while the remaining sub systems had almost similar impacts. In order to improve composting systems, it is recommended that compost blanket and fuel substitution be applied, to enable gaseous emission reduction to the composting process and transportation operations. doi: 10.14456/WJST.2016.21","PeriodicalId":38275,"journal":{"name":"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":"221-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Impact Evaluation of Community Composting by Using Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study Based on Types of Compost Product Operations\",\"authors\":\"R. Aziz, P. Chevakidagarn, S. Danteravanich\",\"doi\":\"10.14456/VOL13ISS4PP\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate environmental impacts contributed by 2 community composting systems, consisting of powder and granular compost production. The main raw materials of these composts were waste from agricultural and agro industrial activities, including animal manures, and solid waste from palm oil mills and rice mills. Data from field operations of both of the composting systems were collected and analyzed. Both composting systems were classified into 5 sub systems, consisting of raw material collection, composting process, electricity consumption, material transfer, and distribution of the compost product to consumers. Impact assessments of both composting systems revealed that the composting process sub system was the main contributor on impact categories of acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), global warming potential (GWP), and photochemical oxidation potential (POP), while on human toxicity potential (HTP) the distribution sub system was the main contributor. In comparing both systems, it was found that granular compost systems contributed a higher impact than powder compost systems, at 1.1 times on GWP, while the remaining sub systems had almost similar impacts. In order to improve composting systems, it is recommended that compost blanket and fuel substitution be applied, to enable gaseous emission reduction to the composting process and transportation operations. doi: 10.14456/WJST.2016.21\",\"PeriodicalId\":38275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"221-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14456/VOL13ISS4PP\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/VOL13ISS4PP","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

采用生命周期评价法(LCA)评价了粉状和颗粒状两种群落堆肥系统对环境的影响。这些堆肥的主要原料是农业和农业工业活动产生的废物,包括动物粪便,以及棕榈油厂和碾米厂产生的固体废物。收集和分析了两种堆肥系统现场操作的数据。两种堆肥系统都分为5个子系统,包括原料收集、堆肥过程、电力消耗、材料转移和堆肥产品向消费者的分配。两种堆肥系统的酸化势(AP)、富营养化势(EP)、全球变暖势(GWP)和光化学氧化势(POP)的影响主要来自堆肥过程子系统,而对人体毒性势(HTP)的影响主要来自分布子系统。通过对两种系统的比较,发现颗粒堆肥系统对全球潜能值的影响高于粉末堆肥系统,为1.1倍,而其余子系统的影响几乎相似。为了改进堆肥系统,建议采用堆肥毯和燃料替代,以便在堆肥过程和运输作业中减少气体排放。doi: 10.14456 / WJST.2016.21
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental Impact Evaluation of Community Composting by Using Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study Based on Types of Compost Product Operations
Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate environmental impacts contributed by 2 community composting systems, consisting of powder and granular compost production. The main raw materials of these composts were waste from agricultural and agro industrial activities, including animal manures, and solid waste from palm oil mills and rice mills. Data from field operations of both of the composting systems were collected and analyzed. Both composting systems were classified into 5 sub systems, consisting of raw material collection, composting process, electricity consumption, material transfer, and distribution of the compost product to consumers. Impact assessments of both composting systems revealed that the composting process sub system was the main contributor on impact categories of acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), global warming potential (GWP), and photochemical oxidation potential (POP), while on human toxicity potential (HTP) the distribution sub system was the main contributor. In comparing both systems, it was found that granular compost systems contributed a higher impact than powder compost systems, at 1.1 times on GWP, while the remaining sub systems had almost similar impacts. In order to improve composting systems, it is recommended that compost blanket and fuel substitution be applied, to enable gaseous emission reduction to the composting process and transportation operations. doi: 10.14456/WJST.2016.21
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Walailak Journal of Science and Technology
Walailak Journal of Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (Walailak J. Sci. & Tech. or WJST), is a peer-reviewed journal covering all areas of science and technology, launched in 2004. It is published 12 Issues (Monthly) by the Institute of Research and Innovation of Walailak University. The scope of the journal includes the following areas of research : - Natural Sciences: Biochemistry, Chemical Engineering, Chemistry, Materials Science, Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Physics and Astronomy. -Life Sciences: Allied Health Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, Dentistry, Genetics, Immunology and Microbiology, Medicine, Neuroscience, Nursing, Pharmaceutics, Psychology, Public Health, Tropical Medicine, Veterinary. -Applied Sciences: Agricultural, Aquaculture, Biotechnology, Computer Science, Cybernetics, Earth and Planetary, Energy, Engineering, Environmental, Food Science, Information Technology, Meat Science, Nanotechnology, Plant Sciences, Systemics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信