剖宫产相关胎儿撕裂伤的患病率及危险因素

Q4 Medicine
Supatchara Taiwan, S. Tuipae
{"title":"剖宫产相关胎儿撕裂伤的患病率及危险因素","authors":"Supatchara Taiwan, S. Tuipae","doi":"10.14456/TJOG.2016.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of fetal laceration injury during cesarean delivery. Materials and methods: Computer-based delivery records of Rajavithi Hospital were retrospective reviewed between January 2009 and December 2013. All data including maternal characteristics, neonatal outcomes, operative records and complications of cesarean delivery were collected. Prevalence of fetal laceration injury during cesarean delivery was calculated. Comparison was made between those with and without fetal laceration injury. Results: During the study period, cesarean deliveris were performed in 10,540 of total 29,532 deliveries (35.7%). Five hundred and fifty cesarean deliveries were met the exclusion criteria. The remaining 9,970 deliveries were analyzed. Thirty-two newborns (0.3%) had observed laceration injury from cesarean delivery. Common sites of laceration injuries were on faces and most of injuries were mild lacerations. Membranes rupture before undergoing cesarean delivery (OR=2.04, 95%CI=1.02 – 4.08) and young maternal age group (OR=3.93, 95%CI=1.58-9.78) are significant risk factors for fetal laceration injury associated with cesarean delivery. Experience of operator, urgency of cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes show no related association with the injury. Conclusion: Fetal laceration injury associated with cesarean delivery is uncommon. Rupture of membranes before undergoing cesarean delivery and young maternal age group are major risk factors for the injury. Women with risk factors should be carefully operated during cesarean delivery.","PeriodicalId":36742,"journal":{"name":"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"24 1","pages":"280-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Risk Factors of Fetal Laceration Injury associated with Cesarean Delivery\",\"authors\":\"Supatchara Taiwan, S. Tuipae\",\"doi\":\"10.14456/TJOG.2016.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of fetal laceration injury during cesarean delivery. Materials and methods: Computer-based delivery records of Rajavithi Hospital were retrospective reviewed between January 2009 and December 2013. All data including maternal characteristics, neonatal outcomes, operative records and complications of cesarean delivery were collected. Prevalence of fetal laceration injury during cesarean delivery was calculated. Comparison was made between those with and without fetal laceration injury. Results: During the study period, cesarean deliveris were performed in 10,540 of total 29,532 deliveries (35.7%). Five hundred and fifty cesarean deliveries were met the exclusion criteria. The remaining 9,970 deliveries were analyzed. Thirty-two newborns (0.3%) had observed laceration injury from cesarean delivery. Common sites of laceration injuries were on faces and most of injuries were mild lacerations. Membranes rupture before undergoing cesarean delivery (OR=2.04, 95%CI=1.02 – 4.08) and young maternal age group (OR=3.93, 95%CI=1.58-9.78) are significant risk factors for fetal laceration injury associated with cesarean delivery. Experience of operator, urgency of cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes show no related association with the injury. Conclusion: Fetal laceration injury associated with cesarean delivery is uncommon. Rupture of membranes before undergoing cesarean delivery and young maternal age group are major risk factors for the injury. Women with risk factors should be carefully operated during cesarean delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"280-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14456/TJOG.2016.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/TJOG.2016.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:了解剖宫产术中胎儿撕裂伤的发生率及危险因素。材料和方法:回顾性分析2009年1月至2013年12月Rajavithi医院计算机分娩记录。收集所有资料,包括产妇特征、新生儿结局、手术记录和剖宫产并发症。计算剖宫产过程中胎儿撕裂伤的发生率。对有和无胎裂伤组进行比较。结果:在研究期间,29,532例分娩中,有10,540例进行了剖宫产,占35.7%。550例剖宫产符合排除标准。对剩余的9970例分娩进行了分析。剖宫产所致新生儿撕裂伤32例(0.3%)。撕裂伤多发于面部,以轻度撕裂伤为主。剖宫产前胎膜破裂(OR=2.04, 95%CI=1.02 ~ 4.08)和年轻产妇年龄组(OR=3.93, 95%CI=1.58 ~ 9.78)是剖宫产所致胎儿撕裂伤的重要危险因素。操作人员的经验,剖宫产的紧迫性和新生儿结局显示与损伤无关。结论:剖宫产合并胎儿撕裂伤并不常见。剖宫产前胎膜破裂和产妇年龄小是造成损伤的主要危险因素。有危险因素的妇女在剖宫产时应谨慎操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Fetal Laceration Injury associated with Cesarean Delivery
Objective: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of fetal laceration injury during cesarean delivery. Materials and methods: Computer-based delivery records of Rajavithi Hospital were retrospective reviewed between January 2009 and December 2013. All data including maternal characteristics, neonatal outcomes, operative records and complications of cesarean delivery were collected. Prevalence of fetal laceration injury during cesarean delivery was calculated. Comparison was made between those with and without fetal laceration injury. Results: During the study period, cesarean deliveris were performed in 10,540 of total 29,532 deliveries (35.7%). Five hundred and fifty cesarean deliveries were met the exclusion criteria. The remaining 9,970 deliveries were analyzed. Thirty-two newborns (0.3%) had observed laceration injury from cesarean delivery. Common sites of laceration injuries were on faces and most of injuries were mild lacerations. Membranes rupture before undergoing cesarean delivery (OR=2.04, 95%CI=1.02 – 4.08) and young maternal age group (OR=3.93, 95%CI=1.58-9.78) are significant risk factors for fetal laceration injury associated with cesarean delivery. Experience of operator, urgency of cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes show no related association with the injury. Conclusion: Fetal laceration injury associated with cesarean delivery is uncommon. Rupture of membranes before undergoing cesarean delivery and young maternal age group are major risk factors for the injury. Women with risk factors should be carefully operated during cesarean delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信